Parker Magin1, Terry Joyce, Jon Adams, Susan Goode, Georgina Cotter. 1. Primary Health Care Research Evaluation and Development program, Discipline of General Practice, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, Australia. parker.magin@newcastle.edu.au
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The significance of occupational violence in general practice is well established, but research has focused almost exclusively on the experiences of GPs. Only limited research has examined the role of general practice receptionists despite their acknowledged vulnerability to violent patient behaviour. No qualitative research has explored this problem. AIM: To explore the experiences of general practice receptionists regarding occupational violence and the effects of violence on their psychological and emotional wellbeing and on their work satisfaction and performance. DESIGN OF STUDY: Qualitative study. SETTING: Constituent practices of an Australian network of research general practices. Practices were located in a range of socioeconomic settings. METHOD: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with practice receptionists. The interviews were audiotaped, transcribed, and subjected to thematic analysis employing a process of constant comparison in which data collection and analysis were cumulative and concurrent. Qualitative written responses from a cross-sectional questionnaire-based study performed concurrently with the qualitative study were similarly analysed. RESULTS: Nineteen interviews were conducted and 12 written responses were received. Violence was found to be a common, sometimes pervasive, experience of many receptionists. Verbal abuse, both 'across the counter' and telephone abuse, was the most prominent form of violence, although other violence, including assault and threats with guns, was reported. Experiences of violence could have marked emotional and psychological effects and could adversely affect job satisfaction, performance, and commitment. CONCLUSION: It is apparent that occupational violence is a whole-of-practice problem and strategies for GP and staff safety will need to take a whole-of-practice approach.
BACKGROUND: The significance of occupational violence in general practice is well established, but research has focused almost exclusively on the experiences of GPs. Only limited research has examined the role of general practice receptionists despite their acknowledged vulnerability to violent patient behaviour. No qualitative research has explored this problem. AIM: To explore the experiences of general practice receptionists regarding occupational violence and the effects of violence on their psychological and emotional wellbeing and on their work satisfaction and performance. DESIGN OF STUDY: Qualitative study. SETTING: Constituent practices of an Australian network of research general practices. Practices were located in a range of socioeconomic settings. METHOD: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with practice receptionists. The interviews were audiotaped, transcribed, and subjected to thematic analysis employing a process of constant comparison in which data collection and analysis were cumulative and concurrent. Qualitative written responses from a cross-sectional questionnaire-based study performed concurrently with the qualitative study were similarly analysed. RESULTS: Nineteen interviews were conducted and 12 written responses were received. Violence was found to be a common, sometimes pervasive, experience of many receptionists. Verbal abuse, both 'across the counter' and telephone abuse, was the most prominent form of violence, although other violence, including assault and threats with guns, was reported. Experiences of violence could have marked emotional and psychological effects and could adversely affect job satisfaction, performance, and commitment. CONCLUSION: It is apparent that occupational violence is a whole-of-practice problem and strategies for GP and staff safety will need to take a whole-of-practice approach.
Authors: Helen Tolhurst; Louise Baker; Gillian Murray; Pam Bell; Amber Sutton; Sara Dean Journal: Aust J Rural Health Date: 2003-10 Impact factor: 1.662
Authors: José Antonio Ruiz-Hernández; María Sánchez-Muñoz; José Antonio Jiménez-Barbero; David Pina López; Inmaculada Galían-Muñoz; Bartolomé Llor-Esteban; Laura Llor-Zaragoza Journal: PLoS One Date: 2019-03-04 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: José Antonio Ruiz-Hernández; Cecilia López-García; Bartolomé Llor-Esteban; Inmaculada Galián-Muñoz; Ana Pilar Benavente-Reche Journal: Int J Clin Health Psychol Date: 2016-06-28
Authors: Lisa Pompeii; Elisa Benavides; Oana Pop; Yuliana Rojas; Robert Emery; George Delclos; Christine Markham; Abiodun Oluyomi; Karim Vellani; Ned Levine Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-09-10 Impact factor: 3.390