Literature DB >> 22750120

Effects of anticaricaturing vs. caricaturing and their neural correlates elucidate a role of shape for face learning.

Claudia Schulz1, Jürgen M Kaufmann, Lydia Walther, Stefan R Schweinberger.   

Abstract

To assess the role of shape information for unfamiliar face learning, we investigated effects of photorealistic spatial anticaricaturing and caricaturing on later face recognition. We assessed behavioural performance and event-related brain potential (ERP) correlates of recognition, using different images of anticaricatures, veridical faces, or caricatures at learning and test. Relative to veridical faces, recognition performance improved for caricatures, with performance decrements for anticaricatures in response times. During learning, an amplitude pattern with caricatures>veridicals=anticaricatures was seen for N170, left-hemispheric ERP negativity during the P200 and N250 time segments (200-380 ms), and for a late positive component (LPC, 430-830 ms), whereas P200 and N250 responses exhibited an additional difference between veridicals and anticaricatures over the right hemisphere. During recognition, larger amplitudes for caricatures again started in the N170, whereas the P200 and the right-hemispheric N250 exhibited a more graded pattern of amplitude effects (caricatures>veridicals>anticaricatures), a result which was specific to learned but not novel faces in the N250. Together, the results (i) emphasise the role of facial shape for visual encoding in the learning of previously unfamiliar faces and (ii) provide important information about the neuronal timing of the encoding advantage enjoyed by faces with distinctive shape.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22750120     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.06.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  12 in total

1.  Caricature generalization benefits for faces learned with enhanced idiosyncratic shape or texture.

Authors:  Marlena L Itz; Stefan R Schweinberger; Jürgen M Kaufmann
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 3.282

2.  Asymmetric neural responses for facial expressions and anti-expressions.

Authors:  O Scott Gwinn; Courtney N Matera; Sean F O'Neil; Michael A Webster
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2018-09-05       Impact factor: 3.139

3.  Adaptor identity modulates adaptation effects in familiar face identification and their neural correlates.

Authors:  Christian Walther; Stefan R Schweinberger; Gyula Kovács
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-08-21       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Do neural correlates of face expertise vary with task demands? Event-related potential correlates of own- and other-race face inversion.

Authors:  Holger Wiese
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-12-24       Impact factor: 3.169

5.  Effects of Caricaturing in Shape or Color on Familiarity Decisions for Familiar and Unfamiliar Faces.

Authors:  Marlena L Itz; Stefan R Schweinberger; Jürgen M Kaufmann
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-02-22       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Anticipation of Negative Pictures Enhances the P2 and P3 in Their Later Recognition.

Authors:  Huiyan Lin; Jing Xiang; Saili Li; Jiafeng Liang; Hua Jin
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-11-30       Impact factor: 3.169

7.  Adjudicating between face-coding models with individual-face fMRI responses.

Authors:  Johan D Carlin; Nikolaus Kriegeskorte
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2017-07-26       Impact factor: 4.475

8.  The light-makeup advantage in facial processing: Evidence from event-related potentials.

Authors:  Keiko Tagai; Hitomi Shimakura; Hiroko Isobe; Hiroshi Nittono
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-02-24       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Fearful contextual expression impairs the encoding and recognition of target faces: an ERP study.

Authors:  Huiyan Lin; Claudia Schulz; Thomas Straube
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 3.558

10.  Upright or inverted, entire or exploded: right-hemispheric superiority in face recognition withstands multiple spatial manipulations.

Authors:  Giulia Prete; Daniele Marzoli; Luca Tommasi
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2015-12-01       Impact factor: 2.984

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.