Literature DB >> 22750056

Motion-sensitive cortex and motion semantics in American Sign Language.

Stephen McCullough1, Ayse Pinar Saygin, Franco Korpics, Karen Emmorey.   

Abstract

Previous research indicates that motion-sensitive brain regions are engaged when comprehending motion semantics expressed by words or sentences. Using fMRI, we investigated whether such neural modulation can occur when the linguistic signal itself is visually dynamic and motion semantics is expressed by movements of the hands. Deaf and hearing users of American Sign Language (ASL) were presented with signed sentences that conveyed motion semantics ("The deer walked along the hillside.") or were static, conveying little or no motion ("The deer slept along the hillside."); sentences were matched for the amount of visual motion. Motion-sensitive visual areas (MT+) were localized individually in each participant. As a control, the Fusiform Face Area (FFA) was also localized for the deaf participants. The whole-brain analysis revealed static (locative) sentences engaged regions in left parietal cortex more than motion sentences, replicating previous results implicating these regions in comprehending spatial language for sign languages. Greater activation was observed in the functionally defined MT+ ROI for motion than static sentences for both deaf and hearing signers. No modulation of neural activity by sentence type was observed in the FFA. Deafness did not affect modulation of MT+ by motion semantics, but hearing signers exhibited stronger neural activity in MT+ for both sentence types, perhaps due to differences in exposure and/or use of ASL. We conclude that top down modulation of motion-sensitive cortex by linguistic semantics is not disrupted by the visual motion that is present in sign language sentences.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22750056      PMCID: PMC3429697          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.06.029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  38 in total

Review 1.  The problem of functional localization in the human brain.

Authors:  Matthew Brett; Ingrid S Johnsrude; Adrian M Owen
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 34.870

2.  Neural correlates of British sign language comprehension: spatial processing demands of topographic language.

Authors:  Mairéad MacSweeney; Bencie Woll; Ruth Campbell; Gemma A Calvert; Philip K McGuire; Anthony S David; Andrew Simmons; Michael J Brammer
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2002-10-01       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Brain Areas Active during Visual Perception of Biological Motion.

Authors:  Emily D Grossman; Randolph Blake
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2002-09-12       Impact factor: 17.173

4.  The role of age of acquisition and language usage in early, high-proficient bilinguals: an fMRI study during verbal fluency.

Authors:  Daniela Perani; Jubin Abutalebi; Eraldo Paulesu; Simona Brambati; Paola Scifo; Stefano F Cappa; Ferruccio Fazio
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  The Brain's concepts: the role of the Sensory-motor system in conceptual knowledge.

Authors:  Vittorio Gallese; George Lakoff
Journal:  Cogn Neuropsychol       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Sign language structure: an outline of the visual communication systems of the American deaf. 1960.

Authors:  William C Stokoe
Journal:  J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ       Date:  2005

7.  Perception of motion affects language processing.

Authors:  Michael P Kaschak; Carol J Madden; David J Therriault; Richard H Yaxley; Mark Aveyard; Adrienne A Blanchard; Rolf A Zwaan
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2005-01

8.  Motion detection and motion verbs: language affects low-level visual perception.

Authors:  Lotte Meteyard; Bahador Bahrami; Gabriella Vigliocco
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2007-11

9.  Visual motion interferes with lexical decision on motion words.

Authors:  Lotte Meteyard; Nahid Zokaei; Bahador Bahrami; Gabriella Vigliocco
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2008-09-09       Impact factor: 10.834

10.  Area V5 of the human brain: evidence from a combined study using positron emission tomography and magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  J D Watson; R Myers; R S Frackowiak; J V Hajnal; R P Woods; J C Mazziotta; S Shipp; S Zeki
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  1993 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.357

View more
  11 in total

1.  Simultaneous perception of a spoken and a signed language: The brain basis of ASL-English code-blends.

Authors:  Jill Weisberg; Stephen McCullough; Karen Emmorey
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2015-07-10       Impact factor: 2.381

2.  The Action-Sentence Compatibility Effect in ASL: the role of semantics vs. perception.

Authors:  Kristen Secora; Karen Emmorey
Journal:  Lang Cogn       Date:  2015-06

3.  The neural correlates for spatial language: Perspective-dependent and -independent relationships in American Sign Language and spoken English.

Authors:  Karen Emmorey; Chris Brozdowski; Stephen McCullough
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2021-10-28       Impact factor: 2.781

4.  The biology of linguistic expression impacts neural correlates for spatial language.

Authors:  Karen Emmorey; Stephen McCullough; Sonya Mehta; Laura L B Ponto; Thomas J Grabowski
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2012-12-18       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Neural bases of action abstraction.

Authors:  Lorna C Quandt; Yune-Sang Lee; Anjan Chatterjee
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  2017-09-28       Impact factor: 3.251

6.  The role of the superior parietal lobule in lexical processing of sign language: Insights from fMRI and TMS.

Authors:  A Banaszkiewicz; Ł Bola; J Matuszewski; M Szczepanik; B Kossowski; P Mostowski; P Rutkowski; M Śliwińska; K Jednoróg; K Emmorey; A Marchewka
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2020-12-08       Impact factor: 4.027

7.  Psycholinguistic mechanisms of classifier processing in sign language.

Authors:  Julia Krebs; Evie Malaia; Ronnie B Wilbur; Dietmar Roehm
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2020-11-19       Impact factor: 3.140

8.  People can understand descriptions of motion without activating visual motion brain regions.

Authors:  Swethasri Dravida; Rebecca Saxe; Marina Bedny
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-08-28

9.  How sensory-motor systems impact the neural organization for language: direct contrasts between spoken and signed language.

Authors:  Karen Emmorey; Stephen McCullough; Sonya Mehta; Thomas J Grabowski
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-05-27

10.  Action verbs are processed differently in metaphorical and literal sentences depending on the semantic match of visual primes.

Authors:  Melissa Troyer; Lauren B Curley; Luke E Miller; Ayse P Saygin; Benjamin K Bergen
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-12-04       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.