Literature DB >> 22749940

The effect of reintegrating Actigraph accelerometer counts in preschool children: comparison using different epoch lengths.

Youngwon Kim1, Michael W Beets, Russell R Pate, Steven N Blair.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to determine whether ActiGraph accelerometer activity counts and estimates of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity collected at a single larger epoch are comparable to those collected at smaller epochs reintegrated into a larger epoch.
DESIGN: A cross-sectional study design.
METHODS: Thirty-one preschoolers (3-5years) concurrently wore four accelerometers that were each initialized at four different epoch lengths (1s, 15s, 30s, and 60s) during a full preschool day. Counts collected at 1s, 15s, and 30s epoch were each reintegrated and compared to those collected at a larger epoch (e.g., counts from one 15s epoch vs. consecutive sum of counts from fifteen 1s epochs). Six sets of cut-points (Pate, Freedson, Sirard, Van Cauwenberghe, Evenson and Puyau) were applied to estimate moderate-to-vigorous physical activity minutes. Paired t-test and Cohen's d were used to compare group mean differences. Absolute percent errors Bland-Altman plots with limits of agreement were used to compare individual differences.
RESULTS: Minimal group mean differences were found for counts and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity estimates between larger and reintegrated epochs. Relatively smaller absolute percent errors (6.2-9.2%) and limits of agreements (-15.52%, 18.00% to -28.27%, 28.02%) were observed for counts than absolute percent errors (10.1-50.3%) and limits of agreements (-27.3%, 33.3% to -156.9%, 137.9%) for moderate-to-vigorous physical activity estimates.
CONCLUSIONS: Smaller individual differences in activity counts tended to yield larger individual variations in moderate-to-vigorous physical activity estimates, despite minimal group mean differences. Therefore, researchers reintegrating smaller epochs into a larger epoch should be conscious of possible differences in moderate-to-vigorous physical activity estimates obtained from a single larger epoch. Crown
Copyright © 2012. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22749940     DOI: 10.1016/j.jsams.2012.05.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sci Med Sport        ISSN: 1878-1861            Impact factor:   4.319


  10 in total

Review 1.  The Influence of Head Impact Threshold for Reporting Data in Contact and Collision Sports: Systematic Review and Original Data Analysis.

Authors:  D King; P Hume; C Gissane; M Brughelli; T Clark
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 11.136

2.  Physical activity outcomes in afterschool programs: A group randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Michael W Beets; R Glenn Weaver; Gabrielle Turner-McGrievy; Jennifer Huberty; Dianne S Ward; Russell R Pate; Darcy Freedman; Brent Hutto; Justin B Moore; Matteo Bottai; Jessica Chandler; Keith Brazendale; Aaron Beighle
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2016-07-07       Impact factor: 4.018

3.  Modifying Accelerometer Cut-Points Affects Criterion Validity in Simulated Free-Living for Adolescents and Adults.

Authors:  Paul R Hibbing; David R Bassett; Scott E Crouter
Journal:  Res Q Exerc Sport       Date:  2020-02-05       Impact factor: 2.500

4.  Equating accelerometer estimates among youth: The Rosetta Stone 2.

Authors:  Keith Brazendale; Michael W Beets; Daniel B Bornstein; Justin B Moore; Russell R Pate; Robert G Weaver; Ryan S Falck; Jessica L Chandler; Lars B Andersen; Sigmund A Anderssen; Greet Cardon; Ashley Cooper; Rachel Davey; Karsten Froberg; Pedro C Hallal; Kathleen F Janz; Katarzyna Kordas; Susi Kriemler; Jardena J Puder; John J Reilly; Jo Salmon; Luis B Sardinha; Anna Timperio; Esther M F van Sluijs
Journal:  J Sci Med Sport       Date:  2015-02-23       Impact factor: 4.319

5.  Association between objectively evaluated physical activity and sedentary behavior and screen time in primary school children.

Authors:  Chiaki Tanaka; Maki Tanaka; Masayuki Okuda; Shigeru Inoue; Tomoko Aoyama; Shigeho Tanaka
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2017-05-02

6.  "Oh oobe doo, I wanna be like you" associations between physical activity of preschool staff and preschool children.

Authors:  Tom Stian Fossdal; Karin Kippe; Bjørn Helge Handegård; Pål Lagestad
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-11-29       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Moderators of School-Based Physical Activity Interventions on Cardiorespiratory Endurance in Primary School-Aged Children: A Meta-Regression.

Authors:  Ryan D Burns; Timothy A Brusseau; You Fu
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-08-16       Impact factor: 3.390

8.  Accelerometer-derived physical activity estimation in preschoolers - comparison of cut-point sets incorporating the vector magnitude vs the vertical axis.

Authors:  Claudia S Leeger-Aschmann; Einat A Schmutz; Annina E Zysset; Tanja H Kakebeeke; Nadine Messerli-Bürgy; Kerstin Stülb; Amar Arhab; Andrea H Meyer; Simone Munsch; Oskar G Jenni; Jardena J Puder; Susi Kriemler
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2019-05-06       Impact factor: 3.295

9.  Physical activity in 3-6 year old children measured by SenseWear Pro®: direct accelerometry in the course of the week and relation to weight status, media consumption, and socioeconomic factors.

Authors:  Yvonne Vorwerg; David Petroff; Wieland Kiess; Susann Blüher
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-03       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Examination of different accelerometer cut-points for assessing sedentary behaviors in children.

Authors:  Youngwon Kim; Jung-Min Lee; Bradley P Peters; Glenn A Gaesser; Gregory J Welk
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-03       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.