Literature DB >> 22749854

Factors associated with upstaging from ductal carcinoma in situ following core needle biopsy to invasive cancer in subsequent surgical excision.

Jisun Kim1, Wonshik Han, Jong Won Lee, Jee-Man You, Hee-Chul Shin, Soo Kyung Ahn, Hyeong-Gon Moon, Nariya Cho, Woo Kyung Moon, In-Ae Park, Dong-Young Noh.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The present study tried to identify factors predictive of upstaging from ultrasound-guided core needle biopsy (CNB)-diagnosed ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) to invasive cancer after surgical excision.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We enrolled 506 female CNB-diagnosed DCIS patients who underwent subsequent surgical excision between January 2000 and February 2011. A retrospective analysis of patients undergone core needle biopsy and subsequent surgical excision was performed. Ultrasonography guided CNB was performed using either an 8-, 11-gauge vacuum-assisted method, or a 14-gauge needle automated gun method.
RESULTS: The overall upstaging rate was 42.7% (216/506). Multivariate analysis found that a palpable lesion, a lesion size >20 mm, a high grade lesion, and use of the 14-gauge needle method were independently associated with upstaging (p < 0.05 for all variables). We designed a scoring system to predict lymph node positivity in these patients, and the subsequent ROC curve showed an AUC value of 0.746 (p < 0.001, 95% CI: 0.66-0.82). Patient with a non-high grade lesion that was ≤20 mm in size carried no risk of lymph node positivity.
CONCLUSION: Upstaging was associated with lesions that were large, palpable or high grade. It was also associated with use of the 14-gauge needle method. Our scoring system might be helpful to identify patients who do not require sentinel lymph node biopsy.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22749854     DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2012.06.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast        ISSN: 0960-9776            Impact factor:   4.380


  20 in total

1.  Ductal carcinoma in situ on digital mammography versus digital breast tomosynthesis: rates and predictors of pathologic upgrade.

Authors:  Geunwon Kim; Peter G Mikhael; Tawakalitu O Oseni; Manisha Bahl
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2020-06-26       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Prediction of invasive breast cancer using shear-wave elastography in patients with biopsy-confirmed ductal carcinoma in situ.

Authors:  Jae Seok Bae; Jung Min Chang; Su Hyun Lee; Sung Ui Shin; Woo Kyung Moon
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-04-16       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Exosome-encapsulated microRNA-223-3p as a minimally invasive biomarker for the early detection of invasive breast cancer.

Authors:  Mio Yoshikawa; Hisae Iinuma; Yasuko Umemoto; Takako Yanagisawa; Akiko Matsumoto; Hiromitsu Jinno
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2018-04-10       Impact factor: 2.967

4.  Factors Associated With Underestimation of Invasive Cancer in Patients With Ductal Carcinoma In Situ: Precautions for Active Surveillance.

Authors:  Carlos Chavez de Paz Villanueva; Valentina Bonev; Maheswari Senthil; Naveenraj Solomon; Mark E Reeves; Carlos A Garberoglio; Jukes P Namm; Sharon S Lum
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 14.766

5.  Can algorithmically assessed MRI features predict which patients with a preoperative diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ are upstaged to invasive breast cancer?

Authors:  Michael R Harowicz; Ashirbani Saha; Lars J Grimm; P Kelly Marcom; Jeffrey R Marks; E Shelley Hwang; Maciej A Mazurowski
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2017-02-09       Impact factor: 4.813

6.  Do Eligibility Criteria for Ductal Carcinoma In Situ (DCIS) Active Surveillance Trials Identify Patients at Low Risk for Upgrade to Invasive Carcinoma?

Authors:  Tawakalitu O Oseni; Barbara L Smith; Constance D Lehman; Charmi A Vijapura; Niveditha Pinnamaneni; Manisha Bahl
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-05-16       Impact factor: 5.344

7.  Preoperatively diagnosed ductal cancers in situ of the breast presenting as even small masses are of high risk for the invasive cancer foci in postoperative specimen.

Authors:  Bartlomiej Szynglarewicz; Piotr Kasprzak; Agnieszka Halon; Rafal Matkowski
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2015-07-16       Impact factor: 2.754

8.  The Role of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy and Factors Associated with Invasion in Extensive DCIS of the Breast Treated by Mastectomy: The Cinnamome Prospective Multicenter Study.

Authors:  Christine Tunon-de-Lara; Marie Pierre Chauvet; Marie Christine Baranzelli; Marc Baron; Jean Piquenot; Guillaume Le-Bouédec; Fréderique Penault-Llorca; Jean-Rémi Garbay; Jérôme Blanchot; Joëlle Mollard; Véronique Maisongrosse; Simone Mathoulin-Pélissier; Gaëtan MacGrogan
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2015-03-17       Impact factor: 5.344

9.  Comparison of Breast Cancer Screening Results in Korean Middle-Aged Women: A Hospital-based Prospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Taebum Lee
Journal:  Osong Public Health Res Perspect       Date:  2013-06-27

10.  Development and validation of web-based nomograms to predict postoperative invasive component in ductal carcinoma in situ at needle breast biopsy.

Authors:  Seong Cheol Lee; Myung-Chul Chang
Journal:  Healthc Inform Res       Date:  2014-04-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.