Literature DB >> 22749796

Vaccine production training to develop the workforce of foreign institutions supported by the BARDA influenza vaccine capacity building program.

E Bart Tarbet1, James T Dorward, Craig W Day, Kamal A Rashid.   

Abstract

In the event of an influenza pandemic, vaccination will be the best method to limit virus spread. However, lack of vaccine biomanufacturing capacity means there will not be enough vaccine for the world's population. The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (BARDA) provides support to the World Health Organization to enhance global vaccine production capacity in developing countries. However, developing a trained workforce in some of those countries is necessary. Biomanufacturing is labor-intensive, requiring unique skills not found in traditional academic programs. Employees must understand the scientific basis of biotechnology, operate specialized equipment, and work in an environment regulated by good manufacturing practices (cGMP). Therefore, BARDA supported development of vaccine biomanufacturing training at Utah State University. The training consisted of a three-week industry-focused course for participants from institutions supported by the BARDA and WHO influenza vaccine production capacity building program. The curriculum was divided into six components: (1) biosafety, (2) cell culture and growth of cells in bioreactors, (3) virus assays and inactivation, (4) scale-up strategies, (5) downstream processing, and (6) egg- and cell-based vaccine production and cGMP. Lectures were combined with laboratory exercises to provide a balance of theory and hands-on training. The initial course included sixteen participants from seven countries including: Egypt, Romania, Russia, Serbia, South Korea, Thailand, and Vietnam. The participant's job responsibilities included: Production, Quality Control, Quality Assurance, and Research; and their education ranged from bachelors to doctoral level. Internal course evaluations utilized descriptive methods including surveys, observation of laboratory activities, and interviews with participants. Generally, participants had appropriate academic backgrounds, but lacked expertise in vaccine production. All participants acknowledged the utility of the training, and many expressed interest in receiving additional support to implement new practices at their home institutions.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22749796     DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2012.06.041

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vaccine        ISSN: 0264-410X            Impact factor:   3.641


  4 in total

1.  Calcium phosphate nanoparticle (CaPNP) for dose-sparing of inactivated whole virus pandemic influenza A (H1N1) 2009 vaccine in mice.

Authors:  Tülin Morçӧl; Brett L Hurst; E Bart Tarbet
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2017-07-14       Impact factor: 3.641

2.  Enhancing the work of the Department of Health and Human Services national vaccine program in global immunization: recommendations of the National Vaccine Advisory Committee: approved by the National Vaccine Advisory Committee on September 12, 2013.

Authors: 
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 2.792

3.  Awareness and practices regarding zoonotic influenza prevention in Romanian swine workers.

Authors:  Peter M Rabinowitz; Eileen Huang; Blanca Paccha; Sally Vegso; Anca Gurzau
Journal:  Influenza Other Respir Viruses       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 4.380

4.  Technology transfer programme for influenza vaccines - Lessons from the past to inform the future.

Authors:  Christopher Chadwick; Martin Friede; Ann Moen; Claudia Nannei; Erin Sparrow
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2022-07-07       Impact factor: 4.169

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.