Literature DB >> 22749258

Cost-effectiveness of early initiation of fingolimod versus delayed initiation after 1 year of intramuscular interferon beta-1a in patients with multiple sclerosis.

Neetu Agashivala1, Edward Kim.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Fingolimod is a once-daily orally administered disease-modifying therapy (DMT) indicated for treatment of relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis (MS) to reduce the frequency of clinical relapses and delay accumulation of physical disability. In the randomized, double-blind, phase 3 TRANSFORMS trial, 0.5 mg/d oral fingolimod substantially reduced relapse frequency when compared with IM interferon-β1a (IFN-β1a) at 12-months. In a 12-month, double-blind, extension phase of the TRANSFORMS study, patients assigned to receive fingolimod continued to receive the same dosage, whereas patients who originally received IM IFN-β1a were randomized to receive either 0.5 or 1.25 mg/d fingolimod.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the cost-effectiveness of initiating fingolimod therapy early versus after 1 year of IFN-β1a therapy using TRANSFORMS study extension data.
METHODS: A Microsoft Excel-based model was used to calculate the cost per relapse avoided for 2 years with continuous treatment with fingolimod compared with first-year treatment with IM IFN-β1a and second-year treatment with fingolimod. One-way sensitivity analyses were conducted on key input variables to assess their effect on cost per relapse avoided.
RESULTS: The 2-year relapse rate in the early fingolimod arm was 0.23, and in the delayed fingolimod arm was 0.53. The cost per relapse avoided was $83,125 in the early fingolimod arm versus $103,624 in the delayed fingolimod arm. Results of the sensitivity analyses showed an effect of drug acquisition cost and number of relapses in patients who received no treatment.
CONCLUSION: Continuous treatment with fingolimod for 2 years resulted in a lower cost per relapse avoided compared with treatment with IM IFN-β1a for the first year and then switching to fingolimod therapy. Thus, delaying fingolimod therapy does not seem to be cost effective.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier HS Journals, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22749258     DOI: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2012.06.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Ther        ISSN: 0149-2918            Impact factor:   3.393


  8 in total

1.  Modeling Approaches in Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Disease-Modifying Therapies for Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis: An Updated Systematic Review and Recommendations for Future Economic Evaluations.

Authors:  Luis Hernandez; Malinda O'Donnell; Maarten Postma
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 2.  Cost-effectiveness analyses in multiple sclerosis: a review of modelling approaches.

Authors:  Shien Guo; Christopher Pelligra; Catherine Saint-Laurent Thibault; Luis Hernandez; Anuraag Kansal
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 4.981

3.  Disease-Modifying Therapies for Multiple Sclerosis: A Systematic Literature Review of Cost-Effectiveness Studies.

Authors:  Sergio Iannazzo; Ange-Christelle Iliza; Louise Perrault
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 4.981

4.  Disease-Modifying Therapies for Relapsing-Remitting and Primary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis: A Cost-Utility Analysis.

Authors:  Marita Zimmermann; Elizabeth Brouwer; Jeffrey A Tice; Matt Seidner; Anne M Loos; Shanshan Liu; Richard H Chapman; Varun Kumar; Josh J Carlson
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 5.749

5.  Cost-effectiveness of oral agents in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis compared to interferon-based therapy in Saudi Arabia.

Authors:  Mai F Alsaqa'aby; Varun Vaidya; Noura Khreis; Thamer Al Khairallah; Ahmed H Al-Jedai
Journal:  Ann Saudi Med       Date:  2017 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.526

6.  Safety and Efficacy of Fingolimod in Iranian Patients with Relapsing-remitting Multiple Sclerosis.

Authors:  Fatemeh Yavari; Pardis Oliazadeh; Meisam Radfar; Mohsen Foroughipour; Karim Nikkhah; Alireza Heidari Bakavoli; Morteza Saeidi
Journal:  Basic Clin Neurosci       Date:  2021-03-01

7.  Efficacy of fingolimod is superior to injectable disease modifying therapies in second-line therapy of relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Stefan Braune; M Lang; A Bergmann
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2015-12-08       Impact factor: 4.849

Review 8.  How have Economic Evaluations in Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis Evolved Over Time? A Systematic Literature Review.

Authors:  Anggie Wiyani; Lohit Badgujar; Vivek Khurana; Nicholas Adlard
Journal:  Neurol Ther       Date:  2021-07-19
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.