Literature DB >> 22748644

Valve-sparing root reconstruction does not compromise survival in acute type A aortic dissection.

Sreekumar Subramanian1, Sergey Leontyev, Michael A Borger, Constanze Trommer, Martin Misfeld, Friedrich W Mohr.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The optimal management of the dissected aortic root remains unclear. The purpose of this study was to determine whether aortic valve-sparing root replacement (VSRR) compromises survival in aortic dissection repair and to evaluate the comparative efficacy of 2 types of VSRR procedures.
METHODS: The Heart Center database (Leipzig, Germany) was reviewed to identify patients who underwent a VSRR for acute type A aortic dissection (AAAD) repair. Patients were classified into 3 groups: Bentall (biological or mechanical valved conduit), Yacoub VSRR, and David VSRR. Intergroup comparisons were performed using the t test and analysis of variance as appropriate.
RESULTS: From March 1995 to April 2010, 208/374 patients (56%) undergoing AAAD repair received an aortic root procedure. Group 1 (n=130) underwent a Bentall operation, group 2 (n=51) underwent a modified Yacoub procedure, and group 3 (n=27) underwent a modified David procedure. Age and logistic European system for cardiac operative risk evaluation (EuroSCORE) as well as cross-clamp, cardiopulmonary bypass, and circulatory arrest times were similar among the groups. Hospital mortality among all 3 groups was similar (group 1, 27%; group 2, 16%; group 3, 15%). At a mean follow-up of 44 months for group 2 and 27 months for group 3, there was no difference in the need for aortic valve replacement for moderate to severe aortic insufficiency (AI) (2/37 survivors in group 2 versus 1/23 survivors in group 3; z score=-0.279; p>0.05). Five-year survival estimates were 66% for group 1, 65% for group 2, and 80% for group 3 (log rank p=0.2).
CONCLUSIONS: Both the David and Yacoub techniques have similar midterm durability in AAAD repair. When compared with the Bentall procedure, neither technique compromises short-term or midterm survival after AAAD repair.
Copyright © 2012 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22748644     DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2012.04.094

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  13 in total

1.  Techniques of Proximal Root Reconstruction and Outcomes Following Repair of Acute Type A Aortic Dissection.

Authors:  Tyler M Gunn; Sotiris C Stamou; Nicholas T Kouchoukos; Kevin W Lobdell; Kamal Khabbaz; Lawrence H Patzelt; Robert C Hagberg
Journal:  Aorta (Stamford)       Date:  2016-04-01

2.  Long-term durability of preserved aortic root after repair of acute type A aortic dissection.

Authors:  Keiji Kamohara; Shugo Koga; Jun Takaki; Nozomi Yoshida; Kojiro Furukawa; Shigeki Morita
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2017-05-18

3.  One-stage hybrid surgery for acute Stanford type A aortic dissection with David operation, aortic arch debranching, and endovascular graft: a case report.

Authors:  Lulu Liu; Chaoyi Qin; Jianglong Hou; Da Zhu; Bengui Zhang; Hao Ma; Yingqiang Guo
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 2.895

4.  Mortality characteristics of aortic root surgery in North America.

Authors:  Manuel Caceres; Yicheng Ma; J Scott Rankin; Paramita Saha-Chaudhuri; Brian R Englum; James S Gammie; Rakesh M Suri; Vinod H Thourani; Fardad Esmailian; Lawrence S Czer; John D Puskas; Lars G Svensson
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2014-03-17       Impact factor: 4.191

Review 5.  Surgery for thoracic aortic disease in Japan: evolving strategies toward the growing enemies.

Authors:  Yutaka Okita
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2014-10-07

Review 6.  Evolution of surgical therapy for Stanford acute type A aortic dissection.

Authors:  Peter Chiu; D Craig Miller
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2016-07

7.  When and how to replace the aortic root in type A aortic dissection.

Authors:  Bradley G Leshnower; Edward P Chen
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2016-07

8.  Comparison of David V valve-sparing root replacement and bioprosthetic valve conduit for aortic root aneurysm.

Authors:  Walter F DeNino; John Matthew Toole; Christopher Rowley; Martha R Stroud; John S Ikonomidis
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2014-07-19       Impact factor: 5.209

9.  Comparison of outcomes of root replacement procedures and supracoronary techniques for surgical repair of acute aortic dissection.

Authors:  Matthew Valdis; Corey Adams; Michael W A Chu; Bob Kiaii; Linrui Guo
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 2.089

Review 10.  In patients undergoing valve-sparing aortic root replacement, is reimplantation superior to remodelling?

Authors:  Perry Maskell; Matthew Brimfield; Amna Ahmed; Amer Harky
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2021-04-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.