Literature DB >> 22748357

Comparison and effectiveness of regadenoson versus dipyridamole on stress electrocardiographic changes during positron emission tomography evaluation of patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

Paco E Bravo1, Iraklis Pozios, Aurélio Pinheiro, Jennifer Merrill, Benjamin M W Tsui, Richard L Wahl, Frank M Bengel, M Roselle Abraham, Theodore P Abraham.   

Abstract

Dipyridamole is the most common vasodilator used with positron emission tomography for the evaluation of patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HC). The aim of this study was to evaluate whether positron emission tomographic quantification of regional myocardial perfusion (rMP), myocardial blood flow (MBF), and coronary flow reserve are comparable between dipyridamole and the newer vasodilator regadenoson in HC. An additional aim was to evaluate the association between vasodilator-induced ST-segment depression on electrocardiography and myocardial flow in HC. Nitrogen-13 ammonia positron emission tomography was performed in 57 patients with symptomatic HC at rest and during vasodilator stress (peak) with either dipyridamole (0.56 mg/kg during 4-minute infusion) or regadenoson (0.4 mg fixed bolus dose) for assessment of electrocardiographic findings, rMP (17-segment American Heart Association summed difference score), MBF, and coronary flow reserve. The dipyridamole and regadenoson groups consisted of 28 and 29 patients respectively. Baseline characteristics, including rest MBF (0.92 ± 0.22 vs 0.89 ± 0.23 ml/min/g, p = 0.60), were similar between the 2 groups. During stress, the presence and severity of abnormal rMP (summed difference score 5.5 ± 5.5 vs 5.8 ± 6.7, p = 0.80), peak MBF (1.81 ± 0.44 vs 1.82 ± 0.50 ml/min/g, p = 0.90), and coronary flow reserve (2.02 ± 0.53 vs 2.12 ± 0.12, p = 0.50) were comparable between the dipyridamole and regadenoson groups. Fewer patients exhibited side effects with regadenoson (2 vs 7, p = 0.06). Vasodilator-induced ST-segment depression showed high specificity (about 92%) but low sensitivity (about 34%) to predict abnormal rMP (summed difference score ≥2). In conclusion, measurement of rMP and quantitative flow with positron emission tomography is similar between regadenoson and dipyridamole in patients with symptomatic HC. Regadenoson is tolerated better than dipyridamole and is easier to administer. Vasodilator-induced ST-segment depression is a specific but nonsensitive marker for the prediction of abnormal rMP in patients with HC.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22748357      PMCID: PMC3439569          DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2012.05.038

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  16 in total

1.  Novel short-acting A2A adenosine receptor agonists for coronary vasodilation: inverse relationship between affinity and duration of action of A2A agonists.

Authors:  Z Gao; Z Li; S P Baker; R D Lasley; S Meyer; E Elzein; V Palle; J A Zablocki; B Blackburn; L Belardinelli
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 4.030

2.  Regadenoson, a selective A2A adenosine receptor agonist, causes dose-dependent increases in coronary blood flow velocity in humans.

Authors:  Hsiao D Lieu; John C Shryock; Gregory O von Mering; Toufigh Gordi; Brent Blackburn; Ann W Olmsted; Luiz Belardinelli; Richard A Kerensky
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 5.952

3.  PET/CT assessment of symptomatic individuals with obstructive and nonobstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Paco E Bravo; Aurélio Pinheiro; Takahiro Higuchi; Christoph Rischpler; Jennifer Merrill; Miguel Santaularia-Tomas; M Roselle Abraham; Richard L Wahl; Theodore P Abraham; Frank M Bengel
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2012-02-07       Impact factor: 10.057

4.  Initial clinical experience with regadenoson, a novel selective A2A agonist for pharmacologic stress single-photon emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging.

Authors:  Robert C Hendel; Timothy M Bateman; Manuel D Cerqueira; Ami E Iskandrian; Jeffrey A Leppo; Brent Blackburn; John J Mahmarian
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2005-11-09       Impact factor: 24.094

5.  Comparison of the myocardial blood flow response to regadenoson and dipyridamole: a quantitative analysis in patients referred for clinical 82Rb myocardial perfusion PET.

Authors:  Behnaz Goudarzi; Kenji Fukushima; Paco Bravo; Jennifer Merrill; Frank M Bengel
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2011-06-09       Impact factor: 9.236

6.  Dipyridamole-induced ischemia as a prognostic marker of future adverse cardiac events in adult patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Echo Persantine Italian Cooperative (EPIC) Study Group, Subproject Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  E Lazzeroni; E Picano; L Morozzi; A R Maurizio; G Palma; R Ceriati; E Iori; A Barilli
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1997-12-16       Impact factor: 29.690

7.  Prognostic utility of single-photon emission computed tomography in adult patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Paul Sorajja; Panithaya Chareonthaitawee; Steve R Ommen; Todd D Miller; David O Hodge; Raymond J Gibbons
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 4.749

8.  ST-segment depression during adenosine infusion as a predictor of myocardial ischemia.

Authors:  E S Marshall; J S Raichlen; D A Tighe; J J Paul; K M Breuninger; E K Chung
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 4.749

9.  Adenosine versus regadenoson comparative evaluation in myocardial perfusion imaging: results of the ADVANCE phase 3 multicenter international trial.

Authors:  Ami E Iskandrian; Timothy M Bateman; Luiz Belardinelli; Brent Blackburn; Manuel D Cerqueira; Robert C Hendel; Hsiao Lieu; John J Mahmarian; Ann Olmsted; S Richard Underwood; João Vitola; Whedy Wang
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2007 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.952

10.  Effects of age, gender, obesity, and diabetes on the efficacy and safety of the selective A2A agonist regadenoson versus adenosine in myocardial perfusion imaging integrated ADVANCE-MPI trial results.

Authors:  Manuel D Cerqueira; Patricia Nguyen; Peter Staehr; S Richard Underwood; Ami E Iskandrian
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2008-05
View more
  10 in total

1.  Apparent left ventricular cavity dilatation during PET/CT in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: Clinical predictors and potential mechanisms.

Authors:  Paco E Bravo; Abdel Tahari; Iraklis Pozios; Hong-Chang Luo; Frank M Bengel; Richard L Wahl; M Roselle Abraham; Theodore P Abraham
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2015-05-20       Impact factor: 5.952

2.  Late gadolinium enhancement confined to the right ventricular insertion points in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: an intermediate stage phenotype?

Authors:  Paco E Bravo; Hong-Chang Luo; Iraklis Pozios; Stefan L Zimmerman; Celia Pamela Corona-Villalobos; Lars Sorensen; Ihab R Kamel; David A Bluemke; Richard L Wahl; M Roselle Abraham; Theodore P Abraham
Journal:  Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2015-06-14       Impact factor: 6.875

3.  Relationship of delayed enhancement by magnetic resonance to myocardial perfusion by positron emission tomography in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Paco E Bravo; Stefan L Zimmerman; Hong-Chang Luo; Iraklis Pozios; Mahadevan Rajaram; Aurélio Pinheiro; Charles Steenbergen; Ihab R Kamel; Richard L Wahl; David A Bluemke; Frank M Bengel; M Roselle Abraham; Theodore P Abraham
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2013-02-15       Impact factor: 7.792

4.  Stress Myocardial Blood Flow Heterogeneity Is a Positron Emission Tomography Biomarker of Ventricular Arrhythmias in Patients With Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Dai-Yin Lu; Hulya Yalçin; Fatih Yalçin; Min Zhao; Sanjay Sivalokanathan; Ines Valenta; Abdel Tahari; Martin G Pomper; Theodore P Abraham; Thomas H Schindler; M Roselle Abraham
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2018-02-06       Impact factor: 2.778

5.  Rb-82 PET/CT left ventricular mass-to-volume ratios.

Authors:  Andrew Van Tosh; Nathaniel Reichek; C David Cooke; Christopher J Palestro; Kenneth J Nichols
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2017-02-07       Impact factor: 2.357

6.  The relationship between ischemia-induced left ventricular dysfunction, coronary flow reserve, and coronary steal on regadenoson stress-gated (82)Rb PET myocardial perfusion imaging.

Authors:  Andrew Van Tosh; John R Votaw; Nathaniel Reichek; Christopher J Palestro; Kenneth J Nichols
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2013-10-04       Impact factor: 5.952

7.  Comparison of Outcomes in Patients With Nonobstructive, Labile-Obstructive, and Chronically Obstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Iraklis Pozios; Celia Corona-Villalobos; Lars L Sorensen; Paco E Bravo; Marco Canepa; Chiara Pisanello; Aurelio Pinheiro; Veronica L Dimaano; Hongchang Luo; Zeina Dardari; Xun Zhou; Ihab Kamel; Stefan L Zimmerman; David A Bluemke; M Roselle Abraham; Theodore P Abraham
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2015-06-26       Impact factor: 2.778

8.  Regadenoson versus dipyridamole: Evaluation of stress myocardial blood flow response on a CZT-SPECT camera.

Authors:  Quentin Brana; Frédérique Thibault; Maxime Courtehoux; Gilles Metrard; Maria Joao Ribeiro; Denis Angoulvant; Matthieu Bailly
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2020-07-10       Impact factor: 5.952

9.  Comparative Performances of Dipyridamole and Regadenoson to Detect Myocardial Ischemia using Cardiac Cadmium-Zinc-Telluride Single-Photon Emission Computerized Tomography.

Authors:  Fayçal Ben Bouallçgue; Catherine Nganoa; Jonathan Vigne; Denis Agostini; Alain Manrique
Journal:  J Clin Imaging Sci       Date:  2018-11-15

10.  Quantitative myocardial perfusion response to adenosine and regadenoson in patients with suspected coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Mark Lubberink; Juhani Knuuti; Tanja Kero; Antti Saraste; Bo Lagerqvist; Jens Sörensen; Essi Pikkarainen
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2021-08-12       Impact factor: 5.952

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.