Literature DB >> 22748232

Cost-effectiveness of cytogenetic evaluation of products of conception in the patient with a second pregnancy loss.

Nastaran Foyouzi1, Marcelle I Cedars, Heather G Huddleston.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the cost of two strategies for managing the patient with recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL).
DESIGN: Cost analysis using a decision analytic model was used to compare obtaining an evidence-based workup (EBW) for RPL versus obtaining a karyotype of the products of conception (POC) and proceeding with an EBW only in the setting of euploid POC.
SETTING: Outpatient care. PATIENT(S): A simulated cohort of patients experiencing a second pregnancy loss. INTERVENTION(S): Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Total cost of investigating the cause of RPL after a second pregnancy loss. RESULT(S): For all age categories, obtaining a karyotype of POC was less costly than an evidenced-based RPL evaluation. Monte Caro analysis demonstrated a net economic benefit for the karyotype strategy ($4,498 [±$792] vs. $5,022 [±$1,130]). CONCLUSION(S): Our model suggests an economic advantage for obtaining a karyotype of POC in women with second miscarriage.
Copyright © 2012 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22748232     DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.04.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  12 in total

1.  Embryoscopy and karyotype findings of repeated miscarriages in recurrent pregnancy loss and spontaneous pregnancy loss.

Authors:  M Feichtinger; A Reiner; B Hartmann; T Philipp
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2018-06-18       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 2.  The Importance of an Evidence-based Workup for Recurrent Pregnancy Loss.

Authors:  Karen J Gibbins; T Flint Porter
Journal:  Clin Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 2.190

3.  Comprehensive genetic analysis of pregnancy loss by chromosomal microarrays: outcomes, benefits, and challenges.

Authors:  Trilochan Sahoo; Natasa Dzidic; Michelle N Strecker; Sara Commander; Mary K Travis; Charles Doherty; R Weslie Tyson; Arturo E Mendoza; Mary Stephenson; Craig A Dise; Carlos W Benito; Mandolin S Ziadie; Karine Hovanes
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2016-06-23       Impact factor: 8.822

4.  The chromosome analysis of the miscarriage tissue. Miscarried embryo/fetal crown rump length (CRL) measurement: A practical use.

Authors:  Silvia D'ippolito; Nicoletta Di Simone; Daniela Orteschi; Maria Grazia Pomponi; Maurizio Genuardi; Leuconoe Grazia Sisti; Roberta Castellani; Esther Diana Rossi; Giovanni Scambia; Marcella Zollino
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-06-12       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  Recurrent pregnancy loss: current perspectives.

Authors:  Hady El Hachem; Vincent Crepaux; Pascale May-Panloup; Philippe Descamps; Guillaume Legendre; Pierre-Emmanuel Bouet
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2017-05-17

6.  ESHRE guideline: recurrent pregnancy loss.

Authors:  Ruth Bender Atik; Ole Bjarne Christiansen; Janine Elson; Astrid Marie Kolte; Sheena Lewis; Saskia Middeldorp; Willianne Nelen; Braulio Peramo; Siobhan Quenby; Nathalie Vermeulen; Mariëtte Goddijn
Journal:  Hum Reprod Open       Date:  2018-04-06

7.  Prenatal diagnosis of 4953 pregnant women with indications for genetic amniocentesis in Northeast China.

Authors:  Rulin Dai; Yang Yu; Qi Xi; Xiaonan Hu; Haibo Zhu; Ruizhi Liu; Ruixue Wang
Journal:  Mol Cytogenet       Date:  2019-11-06       Impact factor: 2.009

8.  Chromosomal copy number variations in products of conception from spontaneous abortion by next-generation sequencing technology.

Authors:  Rulin Dai; Qi Xi; Ruixue Wang; Hongguo Zhang; Yuting Jiang; Leilei Li; Ruizhi Liu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 1.817

9.  Combination of QF-PCR and aCGH is an efficient diagnostic strategy for the detection of chromosome aberrations in recurrent miscarriage.

Authors:  Luca Lovrečić; Nina Pereza; Helena Jaklič; Saša Ostojić; Borut Peterlin
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomic Med       Date:  2019-10-23       Impact factor: 2.183

10.  Rescue karyotyping: a case series of array-based comparative genomic hybridization evaluation of archival conceptual tissue.

Authors:  Rashmi Kudesia; Marilyn Li; Janice Smith; Ankita Patel; Zev Williams
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2014-03-03       Impact factor: 5.211

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.