Literature DB >> 22748212

The optimal dose of remifentanil for acceptable intubating conditions during propofol induction without neuromuscular blockade.

Mustafa Demirkaya1, Ebru Kelsaka, Binnur Sarihasan, Yüksel Bek, Emre Üstün.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVE: To determine the optimal remifentanil dose required to provide acceptable intubating conditions following induction of anesthesia with propofol without using neuromuscular blockade.
DESIGN: Dose-response study.
SETTING: Operating room of a university hospital. PATIENTS: 50 ASA physical status 1 men, aged between 20 and 40 years, who were scheduled for general anesthesia.
INTERVENTIONS: Intubating conditions were evaluated according to the scoring system described by Viby-Mogensen et al. Successful intubation was defined as excellent or good. MEASUREMENTS: For induction of anesthesia, an intravenous (IV) bolus dose of propofol 2.0 mg/kg was given over 30 seconds followed by the administration of predetermined IV remifentanil over 30 seconds; intubation was performed 90 seconds after completion of the remifentanil administration. The dose of remifentanil used for each patient was determined by the response of the previously tested patients, using the modified Dixon's up-and-down method (using 0.2 μg/kg as a step size). The first patient was tested with remifentanil 1.0 μg/kg. If intubation failed, the remifentanil dose was increased by 0.2 μg/kg; if intubation was successful, the dose was decreased by 0.2 μg/kg. Mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), and peripheral oxygen saturation were recorded during the study period. MAIN
RESULTS: According to probit analysis, the effective dose of remifentanil in 50% (ED(50)) and 95% (ED(95)) of patients were 1.40 μg/kg and 2.40 μg/kg, respectively. Preintubation and postinduction HR and MAP values were lower than preinduction values (P < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: The optimal bolus dose of remifentanil for acceptable intubating conditions was 2.40 μg/kg (95% confidence interval, 1.90-9.0 μg/kg) in 95% of patients during induction of anesthesia with propofol 2.0 mg/kg without neuromuscular blocking agents.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22748212     DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2011.11.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Anesth        ISSN: 0952-8180            Impact factor:   9.452


  4 in total

1.  Comparison of intubating conditions after induction with propofol and remifentanil or sufentanil : Randomized controlled REMIDENT trial for surgical tooth extraction.

Authors:  A Dolsan; L Bruneteau; C Roche; F Ferré; F Labaste; A Sommet; J-M Conil; V Minville
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2020-02-28       Impact factor: 1.041

2.  Prophylactic effect of ephedrine to reduce hemodynamic changes associated with anesthesia induction with propofol and remifentanil.

Authors:  Mansoor Masjedi; Farid Zand; Asif Perviz Kazemi; Ali Hoseinipour
Journal:  J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2014-04

3.  High-flow Nasal Cannulae Versus Non-invasive Ventilation for Preoxygenation of Obese Patients: The PREOPTIPOP Randomized Trial.

Authors:  Mickael Vourc'h; Gabrielle Baud; Fanny Feuillet; Claire Blanchard; Eric Mirallie; Christophe Guitton; Samir Jaber; Karim Asehnoune
Journal:  EClinicalMedicine       Date:  2019-06-05

4.  Intubation and Ventilation amid the COVID-19 Outbreak: Wuhan's Experience.

Authors:  Lingzhong Meng; Haibo Qiu; Li Wan; Yuhang Ai; Zhanggang Xue; Qulian Guo; Ranjit Deshpande; Lina Zhang; Jie Meng; Chuanyao Tong; Hong Liu; Lize Xiong
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 7.892

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.