BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The novel cathinone derivative 4-methylmethcathinone (4-MMC; mephedrone) is increasingly popular with recreational users. Little scientific information is available but users report both entactogen-like and classic stimulant-like subjective properties. A recent study in humans reported psychomotor speed improvement after intranasal 4-MMC suggesting classic stimulant properties. Limitations of the user group (which was impaired on some tasks) prompt controlled laboratory investigation. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: Adult male rhesus monkeys were trained to perform tasks from the non-human primate Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery, which assess spatial working memory, visuospatial associative memory, learning and motivation for food reward. Test of bimanual motor coordination and manual tracking were also included. The subjects were challenged with 0.178-0.56 mg·kg(-1) 4-MMC and 0.056-0.56 mg·kg(-1) d-methamphetamine (MA), i.m., in randomized order for behavioural evaluation. KEY RESULTS: A pronounced improvement in visuospatial memory and learning was observed after the 0.32 mg·kg(-1) dose of each compound, this effect was confirmed with subsequent repetition of these conditions. Spatial working memory was not improved by either drug, and the progressive ratio, bimanual motor and rotating turntable tasks were all disrupted in a dose-dependent manner. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: These studies show that 4-MMC produces behavioural effects, including improvements in complex spatial memory and learning that are in large part similar to those of MA in non-human primates. Thus, the data suggest that the effects of 4-MMC in monkeys can be classified with classical psychomotor stimulants.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The novel cathinone derivative 4-methylmethcathinone (4-MMC; mephedrone) is increasingly popular with recreational users. Little scientific information is available but users report both entactogen-like and classic stimulant-like subjective properties. A recent study in humans reported psychomotor speed improvement after intranasal 4-MMC suggesting classic stimulant properties. Limitations of the user group (which was impaired on some tasks) prompt controlled laboratory investigation. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: Adult male rhesus monkeys were trained to perform tasks from the non-human primate Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery, which assess spatial working memory, visuospatial associative memory, learning and motivation for food reward. Test of bimanual motor coordination and manual tracking were also included. The subjects were challenged with 0.178-0.56 mg·kg(-1) 4-MMC and 0.056-0.56 mg·kg(-1) d-methamphetamine (MA), i.m., in randomized order for behavioural evaluation. KEY RESULTS: A pronounced improvement in visuospatial memory and learning was observed after the 0.32 mg·kg(-1) dose of each compound, this effect was confirmed with subsequent repetition of these conditions. Spatial working memory was not improved by either drug, and the progressive ratio, bimanual motor and rotating turntable tasks were all disrupted in a dose-dependent manner. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: These studies show that 4-MMC produces behavioural effects, including improvements in complex spatial memory and learning that are in large part similar to those of MA in non-human primates. Thus, the data suggest that the effects of 4-MMC in monkeys can be classified with classical psychomotor stimulants.
Authors: Gregory C Hadlock; Katy M Webb; Lisa M McFadden; Pei Wen Chu; Jonathan D Ellis; Scott C Allen; David M Andrenyak; Paula L Vieira-Brock; Christopher L German; Kevin M Conrad; Amanda J Hoonakker; James W Gibb; Diana G Wilkins; Glen R Hanson; Annette E Fleckenstein Journal: J Pharmacol Exp Ther Date: 2011-08-02 Impact factor: 4.030
Authors: Tom P Freeman; Celia J A Morgan; James Vaughn-Jones; Nahida Hussain; Kash Karimi; H Valerie Curran Journal: Addiction Date: 2012-01-18 Impact factor: 6.526
Authors: A Richard Green; Annis O Mechan; J Martin Elliott; Esther O'Shea; M Isabel Colado Journal: Pharmacol Rev Date: 2003-07-17 Impact factor: 25.468
Authors: Christopher D Verrico; Laurie Lynch; Michele A Fahey; Ashley-Kay Fryer; Gregory M Miller; Bertha K Madras Journal: J Psychopharmacol Date: 2008-02-28 Impact factor: 4.153
Authors: Steven J Simmons; Jonna M Leyrer-Jackson; Chicora F Oliver; Callum Hicks; John W Muschamp; Scott M Rawls; M Foster Olive Journal: ACS Chem Neurosci Date: 2018-05-11 Impact factor: 4.418
Authors: Anna O Ermakova; Pranathi Ramachandra; Philip R Corlett; Paul C Fletcher; Graham K Murray Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-07-25 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: M Jerry Wright; Deepshikha Angrish; Shawn M Aarde; Deborah J Barlow; Matthew W Buczynski; Kevin M Creehan; Sophia A Vandewater; Loren H Parsons; Karen L Houseknecht; Tobin J Dickerson; Michael A Taffe Journal: PLoS One Date: 2012-08-31 Impact factor: 3.240