Susan T Laing1, Beverly Smulevitz, Kristina P Vatcheva, Anne R Rentfro, David D McPherson, Susan P Fisher-Hoch, Joseph B McCormick. 1. Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Health Science Center-Houston, Houston, TexasDivision of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Brownsville Campus, University of Texas Health Science Center-Houston, Brownsville, TexasCollege of Nursing, University of Texas at Brownsville, Brownsville, Texas.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Framingham risk scores (FRS) were validated in a mostly Caucasian population. Evaluation of subclinical atherosclerosis by carotid ultrasound may improve ascertainment of risk in nonwhite populations. This study aimed to evaluate carotid intima-media thickness (cIMT) and carotid plaquing among Mexican Americans, and to correlate these markers with coronary risk factors and the FRS. METHODS/ RESULTS: Participants (n = 141) were drawn from the Cameron County Hispanic Cohort. Carotid artery ultrasound was performed and cIMT measured. Carotid plaque was defined as areas of thickening >50% of the thickness of the surrounding walls. Mean age was 53.1 ± 11.7 years (73.8% female). Most were overweight or obese (88.7%) and more than half (53.2%) had the metabolic syndrome. One third (34.8%) had abnormal carotid ultrasound findings (either cIMT ≥75th percentile for gender and age or presence of plaque). Among those with abnormal carotid ultrasound, the majority were classified as being at low 10-year risk for cardiovascular events. Carotid ultrasound reclassified nearly a third of the cohort as being at high risk. This discordance between 10-year FRS and carotid ultrasound was noted whether risk was assessed for hard coronary events or global risk. Concordance between FRS and carotid ultrasound findings was best when long-term (30-year) risk was assessed and no subject with an abnormal carotid ultrasound was categorized as low risk by the 30-year FRS algorithm. CONCLUSIONS: Integration of carotid ultrasound findings to coronary risk assessments and use of longer term prediction models may provide better risk assessment in this minority population, with earlier initiation of appropriate therapies.
BACKGROUND: Framingham risk scores (FRS) were validated in a mostly Caucasian population. Evaluation of subclinical atherosclerosis by carotid ultrasound may improve ascertainment of risk in nonwhite populations. This study aimed to evaluate carotid intima-media thickness (cIMT) and carotid plaquing among Mexican Americans, and to correlate these markers with coronary risk factors and the FRS. METHODS/ RESULTS:Participants (n = 141) were drawn from the Cameron County Hispanic Cohort. Carotid artery ultrasound was performed and cIMT measured. Carotid plaque was defined as areas of thickening >50% of the thickness of the surrounding walls. Mean age was 53.1 ± 11.7 years (73.8% female). Most were overweight or obese (88.7%) and more than half (53.2%) had the metabolic syndrome. One third (34.8%) had abnormal carotid ultrasound findings (either cIMT ≥75th percentile for gender and age or presence of plaque). Among those with abnormal carotid ultrasound, the majority were classified as being at low 10-year risk for cardiovascular events. Carotid ultrasound reclassified nearly a third of the cohort as being at high risk. This discordance between 10-year FRS and carotid ultrasound was noted whether risk was assessed for hard coronary events or global risk. Concordance between FRS and carotid ultrasound findings was best when long-term (30-year) risk was assessed and no subject with an abnormal carotid ultrasound was categorized as low risk by the 30-year FRS algorithm. CONCLUSIONS: Integration of carotid ultrasound findings to coronary risk assessments and use of longer term prediction models may provide better risk assessment in this minority population, with earlier initiation of appropriate therapies.
Authors: P Greenland; J Abrams; G P Aurigemma; M G Bond; L T Clark; M H Criqui; J R Crouse; L Friedman; V Fuster; D M Herrington; L H Kuller; P M Ridker; W C Roberts; W Stanford; N Stone; H J Swan; K A Taubert; L Wexler Journal: Circulation Date: 2000-01-04 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Thomas A Pearson; George A Mensah; R Wayne Alexander; Jeffrey L Anderson; Richard O Cannon; Michael Criqui; Yazid Y Fadl; Stephen P Fortmann; Yuling Hong; Gary L Myers; Nader Rifai; Sidney C Smith; Kathryn Taubert; Russell P Tracy; Frank Vinicor Journal: Circulation Date: 2003-01-28 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Richard C Pasternak; Jonathan Abrams; Philip Greenland; Lynn A Smaha; Peter W F Wilson; Nancy Houston-Miller Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2003-06-04 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Aram V Chobanian; George L Bakris; Henry R Black; William C Cushman; Lee A Green; Joseph L Izzo; Daniel W Jones; Barry J Materson; Suzanne Oparil; Jackson T Wright; Edward J Roccella Journal: Hypertension Date: 2003-12-01 Impact factor: 10.190
Authors: J Marrugat; R D'Agostino; L Sullivan; R Elosua; P Wilson; J Ordovas; P Solanas; F Cordón; R Ramos; J Sala; R Masiá; W B Kannel Journal: J Epidemiol Community Health Date: 2003-08 Impact factor: 3.710
Authors: Kristina P Vatcheva; Susan P Fisher-Hoch; Mohammad H Rahbar; MinJae Lee; Rene L Olvera; Joseph B Mccormick Journal: Diabetes Res Date: 2015-09-23
Authors: Ricardo A Albertini; Dario G Ferrer; Pablo A Romagnoli; María E Tinti; José L Amigone; Raúl Capra; Gustavo A Chiabrando Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2017-05-10 Impact factor: 2.357
Authors: Cari Jo Clark; Alvaro Alonso; Rachael A Spencer; Michael Pencina; Ken Williams; Susan A Everson-Rose Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2014-10-16 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Andy B Castaneda; Lauren E Petty; Markus Scholz; Rick Jansen; Stefan Weiss; Xiaoling Zhang; Katharina Schramm; Frank Beutner; Holger Kirsten; Ulf Schminke; Shih-Jen Hwang; Carola Marzi; Klodian Dhana; Adrie Seldenrijk; Knut Krohn; Georg Homuth; Petra Wolf; Marjolein J Peters; Marcus Dörr; Annette Peters; Joyce B J van Meurs; André G Uitterlinden; Maryam Kavousi; Daniel Levy; Christian Herder; Gerard van Grootheest; Melanie Waldenberger; Christa Meisinger; Wolfgang Rathmann; Joachim Thiery; Joseph Polak; Wolfgang Koenig; Jochen Seissler; Joshua C Bis; Nora Franceshini; Claudia Giambartolomei; Albert Hofman; Oscar H Franco; Brenda W J H Penninx; Holger Prokisch; Henry Völzke; Markus Loeffler; Christopher J O'Donnell; Jennifer E Below; Abbas Dehghan; Paul S de Vries Journal: Hum Mol Genet Date: 2022-03-31 Impact factor: 5.121
Authors: Rene L Olvera; Douglas E Williamson; Susan P Fisher-Hoch; Kristina P Vatcheva; Joseph B McCormick Journal: J Clin Psychiatry Date: 2015-10 Impact factor: 4.384
Authors: Marcos A González-López; Marina Lacalle; Cristina Mata; María López-Escobar; Alfonso Corrales; Raquel López-Mejías; Javier Rueda; M Carmen González-Vela; Miguel A González-Gay; Ricardo Blanco; José L Hernández Journal: PLoS One Date: 2018-01-04 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Sabrina E Noel; David J Cornell; Xiyuan Zhang; Julia C Mirochnick; Josiemer Mattei; Luis M Falcón; Katherine L Tucker Journal: PLoS One Date: 2021-01-20 Impact factor: 3.240