Literature DB >> 22747612

Comparative effectiveness of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers for hypertension on clinical end points: a cohort study.

Jason Roy1, Nirav R Shah, G Craig Wood, Raymond Townsend, Sean Hennessy.   

Abstract

Important questions concerning the comparative effectiveness of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) remain unanswered, including whether they are equally effective in reducing clinical end points and in which populations. An incident cohort of adult patients 18 years and older prescribed an ACE inhibitor or ARB between 2001 and 2008 was identified from Geisinger Clinic, a large community-based set of medical practices that uses a common electronic health record. Propensity score matching was used to balance the groups on baseline factors. The authors examined differences in mortality and new-onset coronary disease, chronic kidney disease, stroke, and diabetes for different patient subgroups based on sex and age. A total of 25,035 hypertensive patients newly prescribed an ACE inhibitor or ARB were identified. No differences were found in risk of death, coronary disease, chronic kidney disease, or stroke between those prescribed ACE inhibitors and those prescribed ARBs. Patients prescribed ARBs had a greater rate of new-onset diabetes (hazard ratio [HR], 1.28; confidence interval [CI], 1.08-1.52), and this was especially true for women (HR, 1.93; CI, 1.22-3.07). Within a large medical-practice based population, there was no evidence of differential effectiveness between ACE inhibitors and ARBs for most outcomes, with diabetes being the notable exception.
© 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22747612      PMCID: PMC8108953          DOI: 10.1111/j.1751-7176.2012.00617.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)        ISSN: 1524-6175            Impact factor:   3.738


  16 in total

1.  GRACE principles: recognizing high-quality observational studies of comparative effectiveness.

Authors:  Nancy A Dreyer; Sebastian Schneeweiss; Barbara J McNeil; Marc L Berger; Alec M Walker; Daniel A Ollendorf; Richard E Gliklich
Journal:  Am J Manag Care       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 2.229

Review 2.  Propensity-score matching in the cardiovascular surgery literature from 2004 to 2006: a systematic review and suggestions for improvement.

Authors:  Peter C Austin
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 5.209

3.  Role of bradykinin in hypertension and the antihypertensive effect of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors.

Authors:  I Gavras; H Gavras
Journal:  Am J Med Sci       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 2.378

4.  A more accurate method to estimate glomerular filtration rate from serum creatinine: a new prediction equation. Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study Group.

Authors:  A S Levey; J P Bosch; J B Lewis; T Greene; N Rogers; D Roth
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1999-03-16       Impact factor: 25.391

5.  Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin II receptor blockers and diabetes: a meta-analysis of placebo-controlled clinical trials.

Authors:  Giuliano Tocci; Francesco Paneni; Francesca Palano; Sebastiano Sciarretta; Andrea Ferrucci; Theodore Kurtz; Giuseppe Mancia; Massimo Volpe
Journal:  Am J Hypertens       Date:  2011-02-17       Impact factor: 2.689

6.  Effect of captopril, losartan, and bradykinin on early steps of insulin action.

Authors:  C R Carvalho; A C Thirone; J A Gontijo; L A Velloso; M J Saad
Journal:  Diabetes       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 9.461

7.  Meta-analysis: effect of monotherapy and combination therapy with inhibitors of the renin angiotensin system on proteinuria in renal disease.

Authors:  Regina Kunz; Chris Friedrich; Marcel Wolbers; Johannes F E Mann
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2007-11-05       Impact factor: 25.391

8.  Effect of bradykinin-receptor blockade on the response to angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitor in normotensive and hypertensive subjects.

Authors:  J V Gainer; J D Morrow; A Loveland; D J King; N J Brown
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1998-10-29       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Seventh report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure.

Authors:  Aram V Chobanian; George L Bakris; Henry R Black; William C Cushman; Lee A Green; Joseph L Izzo; Daniel W Jones; Barry J Materson; Suzanne Oparil; Jackson T Wright; Edward J Roccella
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2003-12-01       Impact factor: 10.190

10.  Evaluating medication effects outside of clinical trials: new-user designs.

Authors:  Wayne A Ray
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2003-11-01       Impact factor: 4.897

View more
  9 in total

1.  Associations of Opioid Prescriptions with Death and Hospitalization across the Spectrum of Estimated GFR.

Authors:  Tessa K Novick; Aditya Surapaneni; Jung-Im Shin; G Caleb Alexander; Lesley A Inker; Eric A Wright; Alex R Chang; Morgan E Grams
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2019-10-03       Impact factor: 8.237

2.  Patients With Newly Diagnosed Hypertension Treated With the Renin Angiotensin Receptor Blocker Azilsartan Medoxomil vs Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors: The Prospective EARLY Registry.

Authors:  Roland E Schmieder; Sebastian A Potthoff; Peter Bramlage; Peter Baumgart; Felix Mahfoud; Hartmut Buhck; Taoufik Ouarrak; Martina Ehmen; Jochen Senges; Anselm K Gitt
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2015-06-24       Impact factor: 3.738

3.  Comparative effectiveness of ACEIs and ARBs.

Authors:  Jason Roy; Nirav Shah; G Craig Wood; Ray Townsend; Sean Hennessy
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2012-09-04       Impact factor: 3.738

4.  A Bayesian nonparametric approach to marginal structural models for point treatments and a continuous or survival outcome.

Authors:  Jason Roy; Kirsten J Lum; Michael J Daniels
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2016-06-26       Impact factor: 5.279

5.  Effects of combining azilsartan medoxomil with amlodipine in patients with stage 2 hypertension.

Authors:  Michael A Weber; William B White; Domenic Sica; George L Bakris; Charlie Cao; Andrew Roberts; Stuart Kupfer
Journal:  Blood Press Monit       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 1.444

6.  Effectiveness of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers on total and cardiovascular mortality and morbidity in primary prevention: A nationwide study based on French Health Insurance Data (SNDS).

Authors:  Emmanuel Oger; Sandrine Kerbrat; Emmanuel Nowak; François Paillard; Pierre-Yves Scarabin; André Happe
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 3.738

7.  Serum albumin and risks of hospitalization and death: Findings from the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities study.

Authors:  Colleen M Shannon; Shoshana H Ballew; Natalie Daya; Linda Zhou; Alex R Chang; Yingying Sang; Josef Coresh; Elizabeth Selvin; Morgan E Grams
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2021-07-23       Impact factor: 7.538

8.  EARLY Treatment with azilsartan compared to ACE-inhibitors in anti-hypertensive therapy--rationale and design of the EARLY hypertension registry.

Authors:  Anselm K Gitt; Peter Baumgart; Peter Bramlage; Felix Mahfoud; Sebastian A Potthoff; Jochen Senges; Steffen Schneider; Hartmut Buhck; Roland E Schmieder
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2013-07-02       Impact factor: 2.298

9.  Azilsartan compared to ACE inhibitors in anti-hypertensive therapy: one-year outcomes of the observational EARLY registry.

Authors:  Anselm K Gitt; Peter Bramlage; Sebastian A Potthoff; Peter Baumgart; Felix Mahfoud; Hartmut Buhck; Martina Ehmen; Taoufik Ouarrak; Jochen Senges; Roland E Schmieder
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2016-03-08       Impact factor: 2.298

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.