Literature DB >> 22746538

Real-time monitoring of non-viable airborne particles correlates with airborne colonies and represents an acceptable surrogate for daily assessment of cell-processing cleanroom performance.

Jay S Raval1, Eileen Koch, Albert D Donnenberg.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AIMS: Airborne particulate monitoring is mandated as a component of good manufacturing practice. We present a procedure developed to monitor and interpret airborne particulates in an International Organization for Standardization (ISO) class 7 cleanroom used for the cell processing of Section 351 and Section 361 products.
METHODS: We collected paired viable and non-viable airborne particle data over a period of 1 year in locations chosen to provide a range of air quality. We used receiver operator characteristic (ROC) analysis to determine empirically the relationship between non-viable and viable airborne particle counts.
RESULTS: Viable and non-viable particles were well-correlated (r(2) = 0.78), with outlier observations at the low end of the scale (non-viable particles without detectable airborne colonies). ROC analysis predicted viable counts ≥ 0.5/feet(3) (a limit set by the United States Pharmacopeia) at an action limit of ≥ 32 000 particles (≥ 0.5 µ)/feet(3), with 95.6% sensitivity and 50% specificity. This limit was exceeded 2.6 times during 18 months of retrospective daily cleanroom data (an expected false alarm rate of 1.3 times/year). After implementing this action limit, we were alerted in real time to an air-handling failure undetected by our hospital facilities management.
CONCLUSIONS: A rational action limit for non-viable particles was determined based on the correlation with airborne colonies. Reaching or exceeding the action limit of 32 000 non-viable particles/feet(3) triggers suspension of cleanroom cell-processing activities, deep cleaning, investigation of air handling, and a deviation management process. Our full procedure for particle monitoring is available as an online supplement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22746538      PMCID: PMC4165074          DOI: 10.3109/14653249.2012.698728

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cytotherapy        ISSN: 1465-3249            Impact factor:   5.414


  20 in total

Review 1.  Dispersal of skin microorganisms.

Authors:  W C Noble
Journal:  Br J Dermatol       Date:  1975-10       Impact factor: 9.302

2.  Microbiological commissioning and monitoring of operating theatre suites.

Authors:  P N Hoffman; J Williams; A Stacey; A M Bennett; G L Ridgway; C Dobson; I Fraser; H Humphreys
Journal:  J Hosp Infect       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 3.926

3.  Dispersal of bacteria on desquamated skin.

Authors:  R R DAVIES; W C NOBLE
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1962-12-22       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  The correlation between airborne methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus with the presence of MRSA colonized patients in a general intensive care unit.

Authors:  R D Wilson; S J Huang; A S McLean
Journal:  Anaesth Intensive Care       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 1.669

Review 5.  Airborne particle monitoring in clean room environments for stem cell cultures.

Authors:  Fernando Cobo; David Grela; Angel Concha
Journal:  Biotechnol J       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 4.677

6.  Predicting bacterial populations based on airborne particulates: a study performed in nonlaminar flow operating rooms during joint arthroplasty surgery.

Authors:  Gregory W Stocks; Sean D Self; Brandon Thompson; Xavier A Adame; Daniel P O'Connor
Journal:  Am J Infect Control       Date:  2009-11-12       Impact factor: 2.918

7.  Reduction of microbial dispersion by clothing.

Authors:  W Whyte; P V Bailey
Journal:  J Parenter Sci Technol       Date:  1985 Jan-Feb

8.  Airborne contamination of wounds in joint replacement operations: the relationship to sepsis rates.

Authors:  O M Lidwell; E J Lowbury; W Whyte; R Blowers; S J Stanley; D Lowe
Journal:  J Hosp Infect       Date:  1983-06       Impact factor: 3.926

9.  Accumulation and transport of microbial-size particles in a pressure protected model burn unit: CFD simulations and experimental evidence.

Authors:  Christian Beauchêne; Nicolas Laudinet; Firas Choukri; Jean-Luc Rousset; Sofiane Benhamadouche; Juliette Larbre; Marc Chaouat; Marc Benbunan; Maurice Mimoun; Jean-Patrick Lajonchère; Vance Bergeron; Francis Derouin
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2011-03-03       Impact factor: 3.090

Review 10.  Microbiological control in stem cell banks: approaches to standardisation.

Authors:  Fernando Cobo; Glyn N Stacey; Charles Hunt; Carmen Cabrera; Ana Nieto; Rosa Montes; José Luis Cortés; Purificación Catalina; Angela Barnie; Angel Concha
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2005-10-26       Impact factor: 4.813

View more
  3 in total

1.  Culturing Human Pluripotent and Neural Stem Cells in an Enclosed Cell Culture System for Basic and Preclinical Research.

Authors:  Alexander E Stover; Siranush Herculian; Maria G Banuelos; Samantha L Navarro; Michael P Jenkins; Philip H Schwartz
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2016-06-10       Impact factor: 1.355

2.  Effect of Ozone Gas on Removal of Airborne Particles.

Authors:  Priscilla Alvarenga Agra; Patricia Alvarenga Agra; Marilia Fagury Videira Marceliano-Alves; Greice Maria Silva da Conceição; Sérgio Luiz de Lima Assumpção; Celso de Farias Crespo; Letícia Maria Borsarini Philippi; Renata Ximenes Lins
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2022-04-18

3.  Elevator Cabin Decontamination With ACTIVE Particle Control™ Technology.

Authors:  Mark Ereth; Tracy Wagoner; Mark Blevins; Donald Hess
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2021-12-08
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.