Literature DB >> 22745508

A temporal bottleneck in the language comprehension network.

Laurianne Vagharchakian1, Ghislaine Dehaene-Lambertz, Christophe Pallier, Stanislas Dehaene.   

Abstract

Humans can understand spoken or written sentences presented at extremely fast rates of ∼400 wpm, far exceeding the normal speech rate (∼150 wpm). How does the brain cope with speeded language? And what processing bottlenecks eventually make language incomprehensible above a certain presentation rate? We used time-resolved fMRI to probe the brain responses to spoken and written sentences presented at five compression rates, ranging from intelligible (60-100% of the natural duration) to challenging (40%) and unintelligible (20%). The results show that cortical areas differ sharply in their activation speed and amplitude. In modality-specific sensory areas, activation varies linearly with stimulus duration. However, a large modality-independent left-hemispheric language network, including the inferior frontal gyrus (pars orbitalis and triangularis) and the superior temporal sulcus, shows a remarkably time-invariant response, followed by a sudden collapse for unintelligible stimuli. Finally, linear and nonlinear responses, reflecting a greater effort as compression increases, are seen at various prefrontal and parietal sites. We show that these profiles fit with a simple model according to which the higher stages of language processing operate at a fixed speed and thus impose a temporal bottleneck on sentence comprehension. At presentation rates faster than this internal processing speed, incoming words must be buffered, and intelligibility vanishes when buffer storage and retrieval operations are saturated. Based on their temporal and amplitude profiles, buffer regions can be identified with the left inferior frontal/anterior insula, precentral cortex, and mesial frontal cortex.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22745508      PMCID: PMC6622343          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5685-11.2012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  31 in total

1.  The neural correlates of reading fluency deficits in children.

Authors:  Nicolas Langer; Christopher Benjamin; Jennifer Minas; Nadine Gaab
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2013-12-11       Impact factor: 5.357

2.  Selective and invariant neural responses to spoken and written narratives.

Authors:  Mor Regev; Christopher J Honey; Erez Simony; Uri Hasson
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-10-02       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Neural dynamics of phonological processing in the dorsal auditory stream.

Authors:  Einat Liebenthal; Merav Sabri; Scott A Beardsley; Jain Mangalathu-Arumana; Anjali Desai
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-09-25       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  fMRI reveals language-specific predictive coding during naturalistic sentence comprehension.

Authors:  Cory Shain; Idan Asher Blank; Marten van Schijndel; William Schuler; Evelina Fedorenko
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2019-12-24       Impact factor: 3.139

Review 5.  Broca's Area Is Not a Natural Kind.

Authors:  Evelina Fedorenko; Idan A Blank
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2020-02-20       Impact factor: 20.229

6.  The possible role of brain rhythms in perceiving fast speech: Evidence from adult aging.

Authors:  Lana R Penn; Nicole D Ayasse; Arthur Wingfield; Oded Ghitza
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Abnormal resting state FMRI activity predicts processing speed deficits in first-episode psychosis.

Authors:  Miklos Argyelan; Juan A Gallego; Delbert G Robinson; Toshikazu Ikuta; Deepak Sarpal; Majnu John; Peter B Kingsley; John Kane; Anil K Malhotra; Philip R Szeszko
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2015-01-08       Impact factor: 7.853

8.  Temporal scaling of neural responses to compressed and dilated natural speech.

Authors:  Y Lerner; C J Honey; M Katkov; U Hasson
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-03-19       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  An Attempt to Conceptually Replicate the Dissociation between Syntax and Semantics during Sentence Comprehension.

Authors:  Matthew Siegelman; Idan A Blank; Zachary Mineroff; Evelina Fedorenko
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2019-06-11       Impact factor: 3.590

10.  Scale-Free Amplitude Modulation of Neuronal Oscillations Tracks Comprehension of Accelerated Speech.

Authors:  Ana Filipa Teixeira Borges; Anne-Lise Giraud; Huibert D Mansvelder; Klaus Linkenkaer-Hansen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-12-07       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.