Literature DB >> 22745110

Nanofluidic digital PCR for KRAS mutation detection and quantification in gastrointestinal cancer.

Daniel Azuara1, Mireia M Ginesta, Mireia Gausachs, Francisco Rodriguez-Moranta, Joan Fabregat, Juli Busquets, Nuria Pelaez, Jaume Boadas, Sara Galter, Victor Moreno, Jose Costa, Javier de Oca, Gabriel Capellá.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Concomitant quantification of multiple mutant KRAS (v-Ki-ras2 Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog) alleles may provide information in addition to that provided by standard mutation-detection procedures. We assessed the feasibility of a nanofluidic digital PCR array platform to detect and quantify KRAS mutations simultaneously in clinically relevant samples.
METHODS: We assessed 2 groups of patients (colorectal and pancreatic disease): Group 1 consisted of 27 patients with colorectal carcinomas, 14 patients with adenomas, and 5 control individuals; group 2 consisted of 42 patients with pancreatic carcinoma, 4 with adenocarcinomas of the ampulla, and 6 with chronic pancreatitis). Digital PCR was performed with the Digital Array Chip (Fluidigm).
RESULTS: Nanofluidic digital PCR detected mutant alleles at 0.05% to 0.1%, depending on the variant analyzed. For the colorectal disease group, conventional PCR detected 9 (64%) of 14 adenomas that were positive for KRAS mutants, whereas digital PCR increased this number to 11 (79%) of 14. Sixteen (59%) of 27 carcinomas showed KRAS mutation with conventional PCR. Two additional cases were detected with digital PCR. In 5 cases (3 adenomas, 2 carcinomas), the total number of mutant alleles changed. For the pancreatic disease group, digital PCR increased the number of positive cases from 26 to 34 (81%) and identified ≥ 2 mutant alleles in 25 cases, compared with conventional PCR, which identified multiple KRAS mutant alleles in only 12 cases. A good correlation was observed between results obtained with tumor biopsies and those obtained with pancreatic juice.
CONCLUSIONS: Digital PCR provides a robust, quantitative measure of the proportion of KRAS mutant alleles in routinely obtained samples. It also allows a better classification of tumors, with potential clinical relevance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22745110     DOI: 10.1373/clinchem.2012.186577

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Chem        ISSN: 0009-9147            Impact factor:   8.327


  19 in total

Review 1.  Current and Emerging Applications of Droplet Digital PCR in Oncology.

Authors:  Susana Olmedillas-López; Mariano García-Arranz; Damián García-Olmo
Journal:  Mol Diagn Ther       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 4.074

2.  Mutational Heterogeneity in APC and KRAS Arises at the Crypt Level and Leads to Polyclonality in Early Colorectal Tumorigenesis.

Authors:  Mireia Gausachs; Ester Borras; Kyle Chang; Sara Gonzalez; Daniel Azuara; Axel Delgado Amador; Adriana Lopez-Doriga; F Anthony San Lucas; Xavier Sanjuan; Maria J Paules; Melissa W Taggart; Gareth E Davies; Erik A Ehli; Jerry Fowler; Victor Moreno; Marta Pineda; Y Nancy You; Patrick M Lynch; Conxi Lazaro; Nicholas E Navin; Paul A Scheet; Ernest T Hawk; Gabriel Capella; Eduardo Vilar
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2017-06-23       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 3.  Biomarker in Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Marta Schirripa; Heinz-Josef Lenz
Journal:  Cancer J       Date:  2016 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.360

4.  APC promoter is frequently methylated in pancreatic juice of patients with pancreatic carcinomas or periampullary tumors.

Authors:  Mireia M Ginesta; Zamira Vanessa Diaz-Riascos; Juli Busquets; Núria Pelaez; Teresa Serrano; Miquel Àngel Peinado; Rosa Jorba; Francisco Javier García-Borobia; Gabriel Capella; Joan Fabregat
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2016-07-15       Impact factor: 2.967

5.  Ampullary and pancreatic adenocarcinoma-a comparative study.

Authors:  Marwa Ferchichi; Raja Jouini; Wafa Koubaa; Fatma Khanchel; Imen Helal; Dhafer Hadad; Norsaf Bibani; Aschraf Chadli-Debbiche; Ehsen BenBrahim
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2019-04

6.  Comparison of droplet digital PCR and conventional quantitative PCR for measuring EGFR gene mutation.

Authors:  B O Zhang; Chun-Wei Xu; Yun Shao; Huai-Tao Wang; Yong-Fang Wu; Ye-Ying Song; Xiao-Bing Li; Zhe Zhang; Wen-Jing Wang; Li-Qiong Li; Cong-Li Cai
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2015-01-27       Impact factor: 2.447

7.  A Non-Invasive Droplet Digital PCR (ddPCR) Assay to Detect Paternal CFTR Mutations in the Cell-Free Fetal DNA (cffDNA) of Three Pregnancies at Risk of Cystic Fibrosis via Compound Heterozygosity.

Authors:  Emmanuel Debrand; Alexandra Lykoudi; Elizabeth Bradshaw; Stephanie K Allen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-11-11       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Kinetic hairpin oligonucleotide blockers for selective amplification of rare mutations.

Authors:  Yanwei Jia; J Aquiles Sanchez; Lawrence J Wangh
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2014-08-01       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  KRAS G12V Mutation Detection by Droplet Digital PCR in Circulating Cell-Free DNA of Colorectal Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Susana Olmedillas López; Dolores C García-Olmo; Mariano García-Arranz; Héctor Guadalajara; Carlos Pastor; Damián García-Olmo
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2016-04-01       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 10.  RAS testing in metastatic colorectal cancer: advances in Europe.

Authors:  J Han J M Van Krieken; Etienne Rouleau; Marjolijn J L Ligtenberg; Nicola Normanno; Scott D Patterson; Andreas Jung
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2015-11-16       Impact factor: 4.064

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.