Literature DB >> 22744899

Reconstruction of transoral robotic surgery defects: principles and techniques.

John Rukshan de Almeida1, Richard Chan Woo Park, Eric M Genden.   

Abstract

Early functional and oncological outcome studies suggest that transoral robotic surgery (TORS) may have a role for early stage cancers of the oropharynx. Unlike with traditional mandibular swing or pharyngotomy approaches, access to the oropharynx for reconstruction in TORS cases is limited. Maintaining a good functional result necessitates preserving physiological function where possible. The principles that should guide reconstructive surgeons include maintaining a velopharyngeal sphincter to prevent velopharyngeal insufficiency, maintaining sensate mucosa and restoring bulk in the tongue base to prevent aspiration, maintaining separation between the cervical and pharyngeal components, and covering exposed vessels in the pharynx. We present here principles and surgical techniques of TORS to reconstruct oropharyngeal defects using a subsite-based approach using secondary healing, local musculomucosal flaps, and free tissue transfer guided by the above principles. Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22744899     DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1313762

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Reconstr Microsurg        ISSN: 0743-684X            Impact factor:   2.873


  11 in total

1.  Transoral robotic reconstructive surgery.

Authors:  Jesse C Selber; Karim A Sarhane; Amir E Ibrahim; Floyd C Holsinger
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 2.314

2.  Robotic-assisted microsurgery for an elective microsurgical practice.

Authors:  Ahmet Gudeloglu; Jamin V Brahmbhatt; Sijo J Parekattil
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 2.314

3.  Reconstruction of TORS oropharyngectomy defects with the nasoseptal flap via transpalatal tunnel.

Authors:  Meghan T Turner; Mathew Geltzeiler; W Greer Albergotti; Umamaheswar Duvvuri; Robert L Ferris; Seungwon Kim; Eric W Wang
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2019-06-10

4.  Current trends in robotic surgery for otolaryngology.

Authors:  J Kenneth Byrd; Umamaheswar Duvvuri
Journal:  Curr Otorhinolaryngol Rep       Date:  2013-09-01

Review 5.  Is There a Role for Robotic Surgery in the Treatment of Head and Neck Cancer?

Authors:  J Kenneth Byrd; Robert L Ferris
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2016-06

Review 6.  Transoral robotic surgery in the management of head and neck tumours.

Authors:  Vittorio Rinaldi; Davide Pagani; Sara Torretta; Lorenzo Pignataro
Journal:  Ecancermedicalscience       Date:  2013-09-26

Review 7.  Transoral robotic surgery frontiers.

Authors:  James R Bekeny; Enver Ozer
Journal:  World J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2016-07-06

8.  Methodology in Conventional Head and Neck Reconstruction Following Robotic Cancer Surgery: A Bridgehead Robotic Head and Neck Reconstruction.

Authors:  Jongmin Won; Jong Won Hong; Mi Jung Kim; In-Sik Yun; Woo Yeol Baek; Won Jai Lee; Dae Hyun Lew; Yoon Woo Koh; Se-Heon Kim
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2022-08       Impact factor: 3.052

9.  The Nasoseptal Flap for Reconstruction of Lateral Oropharyngectomy Defects: A Clinical Series.

Authors:  Meghan T Turner; Mathew N Geltzeiler; Jad Ramadan; Jessica M Moskovitz; Robert L Ferris; Eric W Wang; Seungwon Kim
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2021-06-09       Impact factor: 3.325

10.  Salvage Transoral Robotic Surgery: A Case of a Nearly Missed Carotid Injury.

Authors:  Meghan T Turner; Michael J Persky; Jessica M Moskovitz; Seungwon Kim
Journal:  Ear Nose Throat J       Date:  2019-09-23       Impact factor: 1.697

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.