Literature DB >> 22744515

Biomechanical analysis of pedicle screw density in spinal instrumentation for scoliosis treatment: first results.

Xiaoyu Wang1, Carl-Eric Aubin, A Noelle Larson, Hubert Labelle, Stefan Parent.   

Abstract

Clinical studies reveal remarkable variation in screw patterns, or screw density in spinal instrumentation. Screw density may have a great impact on blood loss, operative time, radiation, risk of screw malposition, and cost. Thus, there is a need to understanding of the biomechanical effects of screw density so as to minimize the number of pedicle screws while ensuring safe and effective instrumentation. The objective of this study was to compare the deformity correction effects and bone-screw loadings of different pedicle screw densities in spinal instrumentation for scoliosis treatment. Spinal instrumentation simulations were performed on three scoliosis patients using 3 screw density patterns (low, preferred, and high screw density) proposed by two experienced surgeons and basic correction techniques: concave rod attachment, rod derotation, apical vertebral derotation, and convex side rod attachment. Simulation results showed that all tested screw densities generated quite similar correction, with differences between the achieved corrections all below 3°. The average bone-screw forces were 244±67N, 214±66 N, and 210±71 N, respectively for low, preferred, and high densities. It remains a complex challenge balancing the benefit of load sharing between more implants with the overconstraints and limited degrees of freedom introduced by the increased number of implants. Studies on additional screw densities and patterns proposed by more surgeons for a variety of cases, and using more diverse correction techniques are necessary to draw stronger conclusions and to recommend the optimal screw density.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22744515

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stud Health Technol Inform        ISSN: 0926-9630


  3 in total

1.  COMPARISON OF IMPLANT DENSITY IN THE MANAGEMENT OF LENKE 1B AND 1C ADOLESCENT IDIOPATHIC SCOLIOSIS.

Authors:  Bekir Eray Kilinc; Dong Phuong Tran; Charles Johnston
Journal:  Acta Ortop Bras       Date:  2019 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 0.513

2.  Biomechanical investigation of a minimally invasive posterior spine stabilization system in comparison to the Universal Spinal System (USS).

Authors:  D Kubosch; E J Kubosch; B Gueorguiev; I Zderic; M Windolf; K Izadpanah; N P Südkamp; P C Strohm
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2016-03-22       Impact factor: 2.362

3.  Comparison of short-segment monoaxial and polyaxial pedicle screw fixation combined with intermediate screws in traumatic thoracolumbar fractures: a finite element study and clinical radiographic review.

Authors:  Hongwei Wang; Yiwen Zhao; Zhongjun Mo; Jianda Han; Yu Chen; Hailong Yu; Qi Wang; Jun Liu; Changqing Li; Yue Zhou; Liangbi Xiang
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 2.365

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.