Literature DB >> 22743664

Effective retention strategies for midcareer critical care nurses: a Q-method study.

Vanessa M Lobo1, Anita Fisher, Andrea Baumann, Noori Akhtar-Danesh.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Midcareer nurses continue to be overlooked in the current nursing shortage that is amplified in intensive care units (ICUs) requiring greater numbers of specialized nurses.
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to discover what midcareer critical care nurses perceive would be effective retention strategies.
METHODS: As a combination of both qualitative and quantitative approaches, Q methodology was used to allow for the development of innovative strategies as well as to provide an understanding of a population of viewpoints and preferences that can guide retention efforts. Forty ICU nurses between the ages of 25 and 44 years from within a Canadian academic health science corporation completed a 45-item Q sort representing their ideas for increasing staff retention. Data were analyzed using centroid factor extraction and varimax rotation in PQMethod version 2.11.
RESULTS: Four viewpoints emerged: The Healthy Workplace and Respect Seeker, The Flexibility and Reward Seeker, The Professional Development and Teamwork Seeker, and The Lifestyle Seeker. Correlations between the factors were appropriately weak, with seemingly distinct demographics characterizing each. DISCUSSION: These findings suggest a possible association between perceptions and both years of nursing experience as well as age. Implications from the study include the need to involve frontline nurses in developing strategies that will retain them. Following further investigation of the nurses' preferred strategies, it may be necessary for organizations to develop an array of retention strategies rather than implementing a single solution. In future research, generational preferences and the possible dissonance between nurse managers and frontline nurses' perceptions should be explored.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22743664     DOI: 10.1097/NNR.0b013e31825b69b1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nurs Res        ISSN: 0029-6562            Impact factor:   2.381


  5 in total

1.  Athletic trainers' facilitators of professional commitment in the collegiate setting.

Authors:  Christianne M Eason; Stephanie M Mazerolle; William A Pitney
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2015-03-11       Impact factor: 2.860

2.  Critical care capacity in Canada: results of a national cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Robert A Fowler; Philip Abdelmalik; Gordon Wood; Denise Foster; Noel Gibney; Natalie Bandrauk; Alexis F Turgeon; François Lamontagne; Anand Kumar; Ryan Zarychanski; Rob Green; Sean M Bagshaw; Henry T Stelfox; Ryan Foster; Peter Dodek; Susan Shaw; John Granton; Bernard Lawless; Andrea Hill; Louise Rose; Neill K Adhikari; Damon C Scales; Deborah J Cook; John C Marshall; Claudio Martin; Philippe Jouvet
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2015-04-01       Impact factor: 9.097

3.  New partnerships among single older adults: a Q methodology study.

Authors:  Su-Fei Huang; Chiu-Mieh Huang; Shueh-Fen Chen; Li-Ting Lu; Jong-Long Guo
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2019-03-06       Impact factor: 3.921

4.  A scoping review of Q-methodology in healthcare research.

Authors:  Kate Churruca; Kristiana Ludlow; Wendy Wu; Kate Gibbons; Hoa Mi Nguyen; Louise A Ellis; Jeffrey Braithwaite
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2021-06-21       Impact factor: 4.615

5.  Employees' views on home-based, after-hours telephone triage by Dutch GP cooperatives.

Authors:  Ramona Backhaus; Job van Exel; Antoinette de Bont
Journal:  Int J Emerg Med       Date:  2013-11-04
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.