| Literature DB >> 22743588 |
Siti Aishah Hassan1, Salumiah Mijin, Umi Kalsom Yusoff, Phebe Ding, Puteri Edaroyati Megat Wahab.
Abstract
The source and quantity of nutrients available to plants can affect the quality of leafy herbs. A study was conducted to compare quality of Cosmos caudatus in response to rates of organic and mineral-based fertilizers. Organic based fertilizer GOBI (8% N:8% P₂O₅:8% K₂O) and inorganic fertilizer (15% N, 15% P₂O₅, 15% K₂O) were evaluated based on N element rates at 0, 30, 60, 90, 120 kg h⁻¹. Application of organic based fertilizer reduced nitrate, improved vitamin C, antioxidant activity as well as nitrogen and calcium nutrients content. Antioxidant activity and chlorophyll content were significantly higher with increased fertilizer application. Fertilization appeared to enhance vitamin C content, however for the maximum ascorbic acid content, regardless of fertilizer sources, plants did not require high amounts of fertilizer.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22743588 PMCID: PMC6268055 DOI: 10.3390/molecules17077843
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Ascorbic acid, nitrate and chlorophyll concentration in leaf tissue of Cosmos caudatus in response to fertilizer rates and sources.
| Treatment | Ascorbic acid (mg·100 g−1 FW) | Nitrate (ppm) | Chlorophyll (mg/cm2) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fertilizer sources Inorganic | 328.43a | 261.3a | 30.90a |
| Organic | 411.90b | 193.3b | 30.13a |
| Fertilizer rates (N kg h−1) | |||
| 0 | 259.7c | 115.0b | 24.45c |
| 30 | 419.8a | 241.7a | 29.25b |
| 60 | 438.8a | 243.3a | 31.10b |
| 90 | 378.3b | 244.2a | 35.83a |
| 120 | 354.3b | 292.5a | 31.95ab |
| Source × Rate | ns | ns | ns |
ns, Non significant or significant at p ≤ 0.05, respectively. Means followed by the same letter are not significantly different by LSD test (p ≤ 0.05).
Figure 1Ascorbic acid content in leaf tissue of Cosmos caudatus in response to fertilizer rates and sources.
Nutrient contents in leaf tissue of Cosmos caudatus in response to fertilizer rates and sources.
| Treatment | Nutrient content (%/g DW) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | P | K | Ca | Mg | |
| Fertilizer sources Inorganic | 3.22b | 0.44a | 2.22a | 0.31b | 0.13a |
| Organic | 3.49a | 0.41a | 2.18a | 0.34a | 0.14a |
| Fertilizer rates (N·kg h−1) | |||||
| 0 | 2.73d | 0.35b | 2.04b | 0.38b | 0.18b |
| 30 | 3.44c | 0.43a | 2.24ab | 0.52a | 0.19b |
| 60 | 3.63b | 0.45a | 2.23ab | 0.52a | 0.21a |
| 90 | 3.59bc | 0.45a | 2.20ab | 0.53a | 0.22a |
| 120 | 3.88a | 0.46a | 2.31a | 0.55a | 0.21a |
| Source × Rate | * | ns | ns | ns | ns |
ns, *, Non significant or significant at p ≤ 0.05, respectively. Means followed by the same letter are not significantly different by LSD test (p ≤ 0.05).
Figure 2Nitrate content in leaf tissue of Cosmos caudatus in response to different nutrient sources and rates.
Figure 3Effect of fertilizer sources on antioxidant activity of Cosmos caudatus using FTC method.
Figure 4Effect of fertilizer rates on antioxidant activity of Cosmos caudatus using FTC method.
Figure 5Effect of fertilizer rates on antioxidant activity of Cosmos caudatus determined using TBA method. The TBA values were measured on the 8th day after storage; control (without sample); 0, 30, 60, 90, 120 N kg h−1.