Literature DB >> 22743293

Incentives to promote family planning.

Sarah H Heil1, Diann E Gaalema, Evan S Herrmann.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Over the past 60 years, population control has become an increasingly urgent issue worldwide as a growing population strains already limited resources. The use of financial incentives to promote family planning is an innovative approach that has potential to make a contribution to efforts to better manage population growth. This report reviews eight studies that examined the effect of incentives on family planning.
METHOD: Published studies that tested the impact of incentives to promote some aspect of family planning and included an appropriate control or comparison condition were reviewed.
RESULTS: Incentives have been used to promote attendance at contraceptive education sessions, adoption and continuation of contraceptive methods, sterilization, and to limit family size. All but one of the eight studies reviewed reported positive outcomes, but weaknesses in study design and execution limit the strength of the conclusions that can be drawn.
CONCLUSION: Review of this literature suggests that family planning behaviors, like other behaviors, are sensitive to incentives. Given the tremendous need for efficacious interventions in global efforts to manage population growth, further research on this topic using more rigorous experimental methods is warranted.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22743293      PMCID: PMC3578697          DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2012.06.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prev Med        ISSN: 0091-7435            Impact factor:   4.018


  21 in total

Review 1.  Toward a behavioral economic understanding of drug dependence: delay discounting processes.

Authors:  W K Bickel; L A Marsch
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 6.526

Review 2.  Behavior change strategies for family planning.

Authors:  J P Elder; J D Estey
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 4.634

3.  Birth spacing and risk of adverse perinatal outcomes: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Agustin Conde-Agudelo; Anyeli Rosas-Bermúdez; Ana Cecilia Kafury-Goeta
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2006-04-19       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Asymmetric paternalism to improve health behaviors.

Authors:  George Loewenstein; Troyen Brennan; Kevin G Volpp
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2007-11-28       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  The short-term impacts of a schooling conditional cash transfer program on the sexual behavior of young women.

Authors:  Sarah Baird; Ephraim Chirwa; Craig McIntosh; Berk Ozler
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 3.046

6.  Compensatory payments and vasectomy acceptance in urban Sri Lanka.

Authors:  V de Silva; S Thapa; L R Wilkens; M G Farr; K Jayasinghe; J E McMahan
Journal:  J Biosoc Sci       Date:  1988-04

7.  Incentives in the diffusion of family planning innovations.

Authors:  E M Rogers
Journal:  Stud Fam Plann       Date:  1971-12

8.  Nonmonetary commodity incentives in family planning programs: a preliminary trial.

Authors:  G W Perkin
Journal:  Stud Fam Plann       Date:  1970-09

9.  Short birth intervals and the risk of school unreadiness among a Medicaid population in South Carolina.

Authors:  H Hayes; K Luchok; A B Martin; R E McKeown; A Evans
Journal:  Child Care Health Dev       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 2.508

10.  The effect of monetary incentives and peer support groups on repeat adolescent pregnancies. A randomized trial of the Dollar-a-Day Program.

Authors:  C Stevens-Simon; J I Dolgan; L Kelly; D Singer
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1997-03-26       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  9 in total

1.  Incentives and health: an introduction.

Authors:  Stephen T Higgins; Kenneth Silverman; Stacey C Sigmon; Neal A Naito
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2012-04-20       Impact factor: 4.018

2.  Behavioral economic incentives to improve adherence to antiretroviral medication.

Authors:  Sebastian Linnemayr; Chad Stecher; Barbara Mukasa
Journal:  AIDS       Date:  2017-03-13       Impact factor: 4.177

Review 3.  Paying for Performance to Improve the Delivery and Uptake of Family Planning in Low and Middle Income Countries: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Claire Blacklock; Ekelechi MacPepple; Setor Kunutsor; Sophie Witter
Journal:  Stud Fam Plann       Date:  2016-11-17

4.  The Empower Nudge lottery to increase dual protection use: a proof-of-concept randomised pilot trial in South Africa.

Authors:  Omar Galárraga; Jane Harries; Brendan Maughan-Brown; Diane Cooper; Susan E Short; Mark N Lurie; Abigail Harrison
Journal:  Reprod Health Matters       Date:  2018-12

5.  Competency assessment of the medical interns and nurses and documenting prevailing practices to provide family planning services in teaching hospitals in three states of India.

Authors:  Madhu Gupta; Madhur Verma; Kiranjit Kaur; Kirti Iyengar; Tarundeep Singh; Anju Singh
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-11-06       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Sterilization incentives and associated regret among ever married women in India, NFHS, 2015-16.

Authors:  Anjali Bansal; Laxmi Kant Dwivedi; P Shirisha
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2022-08-19       Impact factor: 2.908

7.  Revisiting Post-Sterilization Regret in India.

Authors:  Gargi Pal; Himanshu Chaurasia
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2020-05-16

Review 8.  Review of performance-based incentives in community-based family planning programmes.

Authors:  Nicole M Bellows; Ian Askew; Benjamin Bellows
Journal:  J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care       Date:  2014-07-18

9.  Pattern and correlates of out-of-pocket payment (OOP) on female sterilization in India, 1990-2014.

Authors:  Sanjay K Mohanty; Suyash Mishra; Sayantani Chatterjee; Niranjan Saggurti
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2020-01-22       Impact factor: 2.809

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.