Literature DB >> 22743064

[Robot-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy: comparison with abdominal myomectomy].

N Ranisavljevic1, G Mercier, F Masia, P Mares, R De Tayrac, G Triopon.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare morbidity of robot-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy versus those performed by laparotomy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: It reports a monocentric retrospective case matched analysis enrolling 22 patients (six laparotomic and 16 robot-assisted laparoscopic myomectomies), needing a surgical treatment for at least one myoma oversizing 6cm.
RESULTS: Both patient groups were comparable regarding their age, their weight and myoma's size. There were more complications in the laparotomy group in comparison with the robotic group (66.7%, versus 0%; P=0.002). Average intraoperative blood losses were respectively 397±377mL versus 387±349mL (P=0.71) and length of stay 7.2±0.8 days versus 3.9±2.8 days (P<0.001). None of the robot-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy needed any conversion to laparotomy.
CONCLUSION: Robot-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy seems to be feasible for heavy fibroids, with a lower morbidity in comparison with laparotomy. These results must be confirmed by several wider prospective studies.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22743064     DOI: 10.1016/j.jgyn.2012.05.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris)        ISSN: 0150-9918


  1 in total

1.  Comparison of perioperative outcomes among robot-assisted, conventional laparoscopic, and abdominal/open myomectomies

Authors:  Esra Özbaşlı; Mete Güngör
Journal:  J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc       Date:  2021-10-12
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.