Literature DB >> 22742884

Vemurafenib in patients with BRAF V600E mutation-positive advanced melanoma.

Marcus C Ravnan1, Mazen S Matalka.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Vemurafenib is an oral, small-molecule kinase inhibitor that selectively targets activated BRAF V600E and has been approved for the treatment of advanced BRAF mutation-positive melanoma.
OBJECTIVE: This article reviews the clinical pharmacology, efficacy, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of vemurafenib and in addition outlines proposed mechanisms of vemurafenib resistance.
METHODS: A literature search of MEDLINE and ScienceVerse Scopus was performed using the key words malignant melanoma, BRAF, vemurafenib, and PLX4032. Scientific abstracts, US Food and Drug Administration Web site data (www.accessdata.fda.gov), the manufacturer-submitted approval data from ClinicalTrials.gov (www.clinicaltrials.gov), and the references from applicable publications were also consulted.
RESULTS: Clinical studies have reported that vemurafenib is efficacious and acceptably well-tolerated. In a Phase I study (BRIM-1), a 960-mg BID dose achieved an objective response rate of 81% among 32 patients with melanoma who carried a BRAF V600E mutation. Of the 26 responders, 2 achieved a complete response and 24 a partial response. In BRIM-2, 132 BRAF V600E-positive patients achieved an overall response rate of 53% (95% CI, 44%-62%); 6% achieved a complete response and 47%, a partial response. Response was noted at 6 weeks and lasted a median of 6.7 months (95% CI, 5.6-8.6). Median survival was 15.9 months (95% CI, 11.6-18.3); 77% of patients survived to 6 months (95% CI, 70-85) and 58% to 12 months (95% CI, 11.6-18.3), and an estimated 43% were expected to survive to 18 months (95% CI, 33-53). The Phase III study (BRIM-3) compared vemurafenib to dacarbazine. The hazard ratio (HR) for death with vemurafenib was 0.37 (95% CI, 0.26-0.55; P < 0.001). At 6 months, overall survival was 84% (95% CI, 78-89) versus 64% (95% CI, 56-73) in the vemurafenib and dacarbazine treatment arms, respectively. The HR for tumor progression in the vemurafenib cohort was 0.26 (95% CI, 0.20-0.33; P < 0.001), and the estimated median progression-free survival was 5.3 months with vemurafenib versus 1.6 months with dacarbazine. Finally, the difference in response rates was significant (48% vs 5%, respectively; P < 0.001). The most common adverse events reported have been arthralgia, rash, photosensitivity, fatigue, pruritus, alopecia, cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma, diarrhea, and mild to moderate nausea.
CONCLUSIONS: Vemurafenib is effective for advanced melanomas expressing the BRAF V600E mutations. Resistance to BRAF inhibition can be problematic, but new evidence suggests that combination therapy may attenuate the issue. Targeting the cellular activity of melanoma cells is reported to be efficacious and is expected to delay progression and prolong survival.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier HS Journals, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22742884     DOI: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2012.06.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Ther        ISSN: 0149-2918            Impact factor:   3.393


  24 in total

1.  BRAF Inhibition Decreases Cellular Glucose Uptake in Melanoma in Association with Reduction in Cell Volume.

Authors:  Nicholas Theodosakis; Matthew A Held; Alexander Marzuka-Alcala; Katrina M Meeth; Goran Micevic; Georgina V Long; Richard A Scolyer; David F Stern; Marcus W Bosenberg
Journal:  Mol Cancer Ther       Date:  2015-05-06       Impact factor: 6.261

Review 2.  Ipilimumab for the treatment of melanoma.

Authors:  Shikha Jain; Joseph I Clark
Journal:  Melanoma Manag       Date:  2015-02-25

Review 3.  An evaluation of regulatory and commercial barriers to stratified medicine development and adoption.

Authors:  N A Meadows; A Morrison; D A Brindley; A Schuh; R W Barker
Journal:  Pharmacogenomics J       Date:  2014-10-07       Impact factor: 3.550

4.  A Pilot Trial of the Combination of Vemurafenib with Adoptive Cell Therapy in Patients with Metastatic Melanoma.

Authors:  Drew C Deniger; Mei Li M Kwong; Anna Pasetto; Mark E Dudley; John R Wunderlich; Michelle M Langhan; Chyi-Chia Richard Lee; Steven A Rosenberg
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2016-10-07       Impact factor: 12.531

5.  Melanoma patient derived xenografts acquire distinct Vemurafenib resistance mechanisms.

Authors:  David J Monsma; David M Cherba; Emily E Eugster; Dawna L Dylewski; Paula T Davidson; Chelsea A Peterson; Andrew S Borgman; Mary E Winn; Karl J Dykema; Craig P Webb; Jeffrey P MacKeigan; Nicholas S Duesbery; Brian J Nickoloff; Noel R Monks
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2015-03-15       Impact factor: 6.166

Review 6.  Considerations for the successful co-development of targeted cancer therapies and companion diagnostics.

Authors:  Jane Fridlyand; Richard M Simon; Jessica C Walrath; Nancy Roach; Richard Buller; David P Schenkein; Keith T Flaherty; Jeff D Allen; Ellen V Sigal; Howard I Scher
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2013-09-06       Impact factor: 84.694

7.  Distinct host cell fates for human malignant melanoma targeted by oncolytic rodent parvoviruses.

Authors:  Ellen M Vollmers; Peter Tattersall
Journal:  Virology       Date:  2013-08-09       Impact factor: 3.616

8.  Targeting of BRAF resistant melanoma via extracellular matrix metalloproteinase inducer receptor.

Authors:  Matthew R Zeiderman; Michael E Egger; Charles W Kimbrough; Christopher G England; Tess V Dupre; Kelly M McMasters; Lacey R McNally
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2014-02-20       Impact factor: 2.192

9.  Appearance of New Vemurafenib-associated Melanocytic Nevi on Normal-appearing Skin: Case Series and a Review of Changing or New Pigmented Lesions in Patients with Metastatic Malignant Melanoma After Initiating Treatment with Vemurafenib.

Authors:  Philip R Cohen; Agop Y Bedikian; Kevin B Kim
Journal:  J Clin Aesthet Dermatol       Date:  2013-05

10.  Direct detection of a BRAF mutation in total RNA from melanoma cells using cantilever arrays.

Authors:  F Huber; H P Lang; N Backmann; D Rimoldi; Ch Gerber
Journal:  Nat Nanotechnol       Date:  2013-02-03       Impact factor: 39.213

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.