Literature DB >> 22742593

Accuracy of self-reported height and weight in children aged 6 to 11 years.

Jimikaye Beck1, Christine A Schaefer, Heidi Nace, Alana D Steffen, Claudio Nigg, Lois Brink, James O Hill, Raymond C Browning.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the ability of first-, third-, and fifth-graders to accurately self-report height and weight. Self-reported and measured values for height and weight were recorded for 487 students. The ability to self-report a reasonable value for height and weight improved with grade level, but children in all 3 grade levels significantly underreported their height and weight. Only fifth-graders accurately self-reported their weight; therefore, using self-reported height and weight to determine the prevalence of overweight and obesity for elementary school-aged children is not recommended.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22742593      PMCID: PMC3457756          DOI: 10.5888/pcd9.120021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prev Chronic Dis        ISSN: 1545-1151            Impact factor:   2.830


Objective

Self-reported height and weight measures are among the most common methods used to determine obesity prevalence, and ample research on adults’ and adolescents’ ability to self-report exists (1–3); however, research among elementary school–aged children is limited (4,5). Understanding the accuracy of self-report is necessary to determine the appropriateness of using such measures to determine obesity prevalence (6). The purpose of this study was to determine the ability of elementary school–aged students to self-report height and weight. We hypothesized that the accuracy of self-reporting improves with age and that children underestimate their weight, leading to inaccurate estimations of overweight and obesity prevalence.

Methods

Participants were part of a large, multischool intervention that examined the effects of the playground environment and an educational intervention on physical activity levels in elementary school students (IPLAY study). Data were collected from 487 randomly selected first-, third-, and fifth-graders who attended 1 of 8 Denver, Colorado, metro-area elementary schools in April and May of 2010 and 2011. The Institutional Review Board for Human Subjects Research at Colorado State University approved this study. Self-reported height and weight were obtained verbally using the questions “How tall do you think you are?” and “How much do you think you weigh?” Participants were encouraged to guess if they were uncertain of their height or weight, and they were given time to respond. Height measurements were taken to the nearest 0.001 m and were recorded using a tape measure secured to the wall and a bubble level, as children stood with their heels and back against the wall. Weight measurements were recorded to the nearest 0.1 kg using a digital scale (Health o meter, Model 349KLX, Jarden Corporation, Rye, New York). Children were weighed and measured while wearing indoor clothing and shoes. Measured and self-reported values were judged “reasonable” or “unreasonable” on the basis of biologically implausible values, determined by using Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s body mass index (BMI) percentile-for-age SAS macro (SAS Institute, Inc, Cary, North Carolina), and World Health Organization outlier cutoffs (7). Mean measured and self-reported height and weight, as well as the correlation between these variables for each grade level, were compared using paired t tests and linear regression, respectively. Self-reported BMI was calculated only for students who reported reasonable values for both height and weight. Measured BMI was calculated for all students with measured values for both height and weight. Prevalence of overweight was determined according to BMI-for-age z scores (8).

Results

Mean (standard deviation, SD) ages of participants were 7.1 (0.5) for first-graders, 9.1 (0.4) for third-graders, and 11.2 (0.5) for fifth-graders. Mean (SD) heights were 1.24 (0.06) meters for first-graders, 1.37 (0.06) meters for third-graders, and 1.49 (0.07) meters for fifth-graders. Mean (SD) weights were 26.1 (6.0) kilograms for first-graders, 33.6 (8.3) kilograms for third-graders, and 44.4 (11.5) kilograms for fifth-graders. Average BMI percentile-for-age values were 59.5 (28.8) for first-graders, 59.5 (30.5) for third-graders, and 62.4 (31.7) for fifth-graders. The number of participants classified as obese was 144 (25.6% of first-graders, 28.5% of third-graders, and 34.5% of fifth-graders). The percentage of students who reported a reasonable height or weight ranged from 20% (first grade, height) to 92% (fifth grade, weight) (Table). In general, self-report ability was better in older children and when self-reporting weight. After removing the data on children who did not report reasonable height and weight values, we found that children in all 3 grade levels significantly underreported their height and weight (Table). Correlation coefficients improved with age and were greater when reporting weight versus height. The accuracy of self-reported weight decreased as BMI z score increased (Figure). Based on self-report, 35% of fifth-graders in our study were classified as overweight or obese, whereas measured values indicated that only 29% of fifth-graders who reasonably reported were overweight or obese.
Table

Percentage of Children Self-Reporting Reasonable Values for Height and Weight and Difference Between Measured and Self-Reported Height, Weight, and Body Mass Index, Denver, Colorado, 2010–2011a

GradeHeightWeightBMI

%SR, mD, m r 2 %SR, kgD, kg r 2 %D, kg/m2 r 2
First (n = 21)201.169 (0.019)0.079b 0.224822.6 (0.7)3.30b 0.60106.45b 0.67
Third (n = 61)441.325 (0.015)0.063b 0.387830.7 (0.7)2.82b 0.7532−1.97b 0.59
Fifth (n = 123)781.441 (0.011)0.050b 0.499239.8 (0.9)3.71b 0.86652.91b 0.64

Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; SR, self-reported; D, difference; SD, standard deviation.

a The percentages represent children who reported reasonable values for height and weight. Difference is the difference between the measured and self-reported values. Pearson correlation coefficients are the difference between measured and self-reported values for each variable. Self-reported values are reported as mean (SD).

b Difference between measured and self-reported value significant at P < .05.

Figure

Measured BMI z score and percentage difference between self-reported and measured weight. Data on the scatter plot demonstrate that accuracy of self-reported weight decreased as BMI z score increased. A negative value for the percentage difference between weight indicates an underestimation of weight. For example, a child who weighs 30 kg but self-reported 27 kg is indicated by a −10% difference between the measured and self-reported weight. Solid line represents the linear regression fit. Weight % difference = −0.0757 − (0.0353 × BMIz); r 2 = 0.061; P < .001. Abbreviation: BMI, body mass index.

Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; SR, self-reported; D, difference; SD, standard deviation. a The percentages represent children who reported reasonable values for height and weight. Difference is the difference between the measured and self-reported values. Pearson correlation coefficients are the difference between measured and self-reported values for each variable. Self-reported values are reported as mean (SD). b Difference between measured and self-reported value significant at P < .05. Measured BMI z score and percentage difference between self-reported and measured weight. Data on the scatter plot demonstrate that accuracy of self-reported weight decreased as BMI z score increased. A negative value for the percentage difference between weight indicates an underestimation of weight. For example, a child who weighs 30 kg but self-reported 27 kg is indicated by a −10% difference between the measured and self-reported weight. Solid line represents the linear regression fit. Weight % difference = −0.0757 − (0.0353 × BMIz); r 2 = 0.061; P < .001. Abbreviation: BMI, body mass index.

Discussion

As hypothesized, results suggested that as children age their ability to report a reasonable or accurate estimate of their height and weight improves. Children underestimate their weight, leading to erroneous obesity prevalence estimates, and the magnitude of underestimation increases with the degree of adiposity. Our findings demonstrate that children exhibit patterns similar to those found in adults regarding self-reported weight. However, our results also indicate that children younger than fifth grade cannot accurately self-report their weight or height. The inability of younger children to accurately self-report height and weight may be due to factors such as perceptual limitations (9), social desirability (3,10), socioeconomic status (11), or exposure to overweight and obesity, which may lead to misperceptions of weight status (12). Future studies should focus on the potential effect of such variables on children’s self-report accuracy. The methods used to collect self-reported and measured height and weight values may have reduced the accuracy of the findings; however, these challenges are consistent with the limitations of conducting school-based research. Regardless, correlations between verbal and written self-report in fifth-graders (0.87, height; 0.99, weight) suggest that the negative effects of our methods were inconsequential. Strengths of this study include the large sample size and cross-section of ages not found in other literature on self-report. Although using self-reported data is desirable because of the low cost, ease of data collection, and the ability to obtain data from a large number of people, children’s inability to report reasonable or accurate values for both height and weight renders self-report an unreliable method for determining BMI and, thus, the prevalence of overweight and obesity among children. These findings indicate the need for educational interventions to improve children’s knowledge and awareness of their height and weight.
  9 in total

1.  Self-reported weight and height.

Authors:  M L Rowland
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 7.045

2.  Can children accurately report their own heights and weights, and why should we care?

Authors:  John H Himes
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2010-09-17       Impact factor: 4.406

3.  A study of body weight concerns and weight control practices of 4th and 7th grade adolescents.

Authors:  K Adams; R G Sargent; S H Thompson; D Richter; S J Corwin; T J Rogan
Journal:  Ethn Health       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.772

4.  Bias in self-reported height and weight in preadolescents.

Authors:  Jan Seghers; Albrecht L Claessens
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2010-08-05       Impact factor: 4.406

5.  Self-reported weight and height: implications for obesity research.

Authors:  H Nawaz; W Chan; M Abdulrahman; D Larson; D L Katz
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 5.043

6.  Validity of self-reported anthropometric values used to assess body mass index and estimate obesity in Greek school children.

Authors:  Savvas P Tokmakidis; Antonios D Christodoulos; Nikolaos I Mantzouranis
Journal:  J Adolesc Health       Date:  2007-01-24       Impact factor: 5.012

7.  Do you see what I see? Weight status misperception and exposure to obesity among children and adolescents.

Authors:  K Maximova; J J McGrath; T Barnett; J O'Loughlin; G Paradis; M Lambert
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2008-03-04       Impact factor: 5.095

Review 8.  Accuracy of self-reported height and weight in women: an integrative review of the literature.

Authors:  Janet L Engstrom; Susan A Paterson; Anastasia Doherty; Mary Trabulsi; Kara L Speer
Journal:  J Midwifery Womens Health       Date:  2003 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.388

9.  The validity of self-reported weight in US adults: a population based cross-sectional study.

Authors:  E V Villanueva
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2001-11-06       Impact factor: 3.295

  9 in total
  9 in total

1.  Weight Misperception and Health-Related Quality of Life in Appalachian Adolescents in the United States.

Authors:  Jodi L Southerland; Liang Wang; Deborah L Slawson
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2017-01

2.  Perceptions of tap water and school water fountains and association with intake of plain water and sugar-sweetened beverages.

Authors:  Stephen J Onufrak; Sohyun Park; Joseph R Sharkey; Caitlin Merlo; Wesley R Dean; Bettylou Sherry
Journal:  J Sch Health       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 2.118

3.  Influence of product placement in children's movies on children's snack choices.

Authors:  Callie L Brown; Camden E Matherne; Cynthia M Bulik; Janna B Howard; Sophie N Ravanbakht; Asheley C Skinner; Charles T Wood; Anna M Bardone-Cone; Jane D Brown; Andrew J Perrin; Cary Levine; Michael J Steiner; Eliana M Perrin
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2017-03-18       Impact factor: 3.868

4.  What Matters When Children Play: Influence of Social Cognitive Theory and Perceived Environment on Levels of Physical Activity Among Elementary-Aged Youth.

Authors:  Brook E Harmon; Claudio R Nigg; Camonia Long; Katie Amato; Mahabub-Ul Anwar; Eve Kutchman; Peter Anthamatten; Raymond C Browning; Lois Brink; James O Hill
Journal:  Psychol Sport Exerc       Date:  2014-05-01

5.  Quality of life and psychological functioning in pediatric obesity: the role of body image dissatisfaction between girls and boys of different ages.

Authors:  Maria João Gouveia; Roberta Frontini; Maria Cristina Canavarro; Helena Moreira
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2014-05-10       Impact factor: 4.147

6.  Self-reported versus actual weight and height data contribute to different weight misperception classifications.

Authors:  William T Dalton; Liang Wang; Jodi L Southerland; Karen E Schetzina; Deborah L Slawson
Journal:  South Med J       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 0.954

7.  Accuracy of BMI correction using multiple reports in children.

Authors:  Madhumita Bonnie Ghosh-Dastidar; Ann C Haas; Nancy Nicosia; Ashlesha Datar
Journal:  BMC Obes       Date:  2016-09-13

8.  Measuring the bias, precision, accuracy, and validity of self-reported height and weight in assessing overweight and obesity status among adolescents using a surveillance system.

Authors:  Adriana Pérez; Kelley Gabriel; Eileen K Nehme; Dorothy J Mandell; Deanna M Hoelscher
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2015-07-27       Impact factor: 6.457

9.  The prevalence of underweight, overweight, obesity and associated risk factors among school-going adolescents in seven African countries.

Authors:  Taru Manyanga; Hesham El-Sayed; David Teye Doku; Jason R Randall
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2014-08-28       Impact factor: 3.295

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.