Literature DB >> 22742566

The bladder cancer genome; chromosomal changes as prognostic makers, opportunities, and obstacles.

Mattias Höglund1.   

Abstract

During the past decades, the complexity of the bladder cancer genome has become evident. Early cytogenetic studies identified several patterns of chromosomal changes, particularly the frequent loss of chromosome 9. The cytogenetic approach was replaced by molecular methods, such as comparative genome hybridization (CGH) and loss of heterozygosity (LOH) analyses that describe genomic changes at a molecular and higher resolution. With these methods, the full complexity of the bladder cancer genome has been better appreciated. Using CGH and LOH analyses, it also became apparent that premalignant lesions of the bladder, such as hyperplasia and dysplasia, as well as carcinoma in situ (CIS), showed genomic changes. Whole genome analyses showed that low stage, low grade tumors generally show fewer changes than tumors of higher stage and grade. In addition, several genomic alterations were shown to be highly specific for more aggressive and invasive tumors. Based on the general association between complex genomic changes and tumor behavior, several investigations have been directed towards the identification of prognostic genomic markers for urothelial cancer. A complicating factor in the analysis and understanding of bladder cancer genomic progression is that recurring and, hence, chronologically later tumors may show genomes less rearranged than preceding tumors. Furthermore, morphologically normal urothelium in patients with bladder cancer frequently show the same type of genomic alterations as the tumor proper. This makes an issue of to what extent information on genomic changes will produce reliable prognostic information when limited to the tumor proper.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22742566     DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2012.04.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urol Oncol        ISSN: 1078-1439            Impact factor:   3.498


  9 in total

1.  Genomic characterization of three urinary bladder cancer cell lines: understanding genomic types of urinary bladder cancer.

Authors:  Rosário Pinto-Leite; Isabel Carreira; Joana Melo; Susana Isabel Ferreira; Ilda Ribeiro; Jaqueline Ferreira; Marco Filipe; Carina Bernardo; Regina Arantes-Rodrigues; Paula Oliveira; Lúcio Santos
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2014-01-24

Review 2.  Molecular biology of bladder cancer: new insights into pathogenesis and clinical diversity.

Authors:  Margaret A Knowles; Carolyn D Hurst
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 60.716

3.  Cytogenetic characterization of an N-butyl-N-(4-hydroxybutyl) nitrosamine-induced mouse papillary urothelial carcinoma.

Authors:  Regina Arantes-Rodrigues; Rosário Pinto-Leite; Rui Gil da Costa; Aura Colaço; Carlos Lopes; Paula Oliveira
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2013-05-05

4.  Enrichment of FGFR3-TACC3 Fusions in Patients With Bladder Cancer Who Are Young, Asian, or Have Never Smoked.

Authors:  Amin H Nassar; Kevin Lundgren; Mark Pomerantz; Eliezer Van Allen; Lauren Harshman; Atish D Choudhury; Mark A Preston; Graeme S Steele; Kent W Mouw; Xiao X Wei; Bradley A McGregor; Toni K Choueiri; Joaquim Bellmunt; David J Kwiatkowski; Guru P Sonpavde
Journal:  JCO Precis Oncol       Date:  2018-05-16

5.  Recurrent inactivation of STAG2 in bladder cancer is not associated with aneuploidy.

Authors:  Cristina Balbás-Martínez; Ana Sagrera; Enrique Carrillo-de-Santa-Pau; Julie Earl; Mirari Márquez; Miguel Vazquez; Eleonora Lapi; Francesc Castro-Giner; Sergi Beltran; Mònica Bayés; Alfredo Carrato; Juan C Cigudosa; Orlando Domínguez; Marta Gut; Jesús Herranz; Núria Juanpere; Manolis Kogevinas; Xavier Langa; Elena López-Knowles; José A Lorente; Josep Lloreta; David G Pisano; Laia Richart; Daniel Rico; Rocío N Salgado; Adonina Tardón; Stephen Chanock; Simon Heath; Alfonso Valencia; Ana Losada; Ivo Gut; Núria Malats; Francisco X Real
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2013-10-13       Impact factor: 38.330

6.  Mapping of the chromosomal amplification 1p21-22 in bladder cancer.

Authors:  Mauro Scaravilli; Paola Asero; Teuvo L J Tammela; Tapio Visakorpi; Outi R Saramäki
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2014-08-18

Review 7.  Alterations of Chromatin Regulators in the Pathogenesis of Urinary Bladder Urothelial Carcinoma.

Authors:  Michèle J Hoffmann; Wolfgang A Schulz
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-11-30       Impact factor: 6.639

8.  A systematic experimental evaluation of microRNA markers of human bladder cancer.

Authors:  Anastasia A Zabolotneva; Alex A Zhavoronkov; Peter V Shegay; Nurshat M Gaifullin; Boris Y Alekseev; Sergey A Roumiantsev; Andrew V Garazha; Olga Kovalchuk; Alexey Aravin; Anton A Buzdin
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2013-11-15       Impact factor: 4.599

9.  Identification of ALK gene alterations in urothelial carcinoma.

Authors:  Joaquim Bellmunt; Shamini Selvarajah; Scott Rodig; Marta Salido; Silvia de Muga; Irmgard Costa; Beatriz Bellosillo; Lillian Werner; Stephanie Mullane; André P Fay; Robert O'Brien; Jordi Barretina; André E Minoche; Sabina Signoretti; Clara Montagut; Heinz Himmelbauer; David M Berman; Philip Kantoff; Toni K Choueiri; Jonathan E Rosenberg
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-08-01       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.