Literature DB >> 22740991

Use of contrast-enhanced computed tomography in clinical staging of asymptomatic breast cancer patients to detect asymptomatic distant metastases.

Satoru Tanaka1, Nayuko Sato, Hiroya Fujioka, Yuko Takahashi, Kosei Kimura, Mitsuhiko Iwamoto, Kazuhisa Uchiyama.   

Abstract

The use of computed tomography (CT) with regards to the clinical staging of patients with asymptomatic breast cancer has been on the increase in clinical practice. However, the benefits of routine CT have yet to be fully clarified. This study investigated the value of employing contrast-enhanced CT (CECT) to screen for distant metastases in patients with asymptomatic breast cancer. The clinical records of 483 patients with asymptomatic breast cancer who underwent CECT at a single institution between April 2006 and January 2011 were reviewed retrospectively. The CECT results were classified into normal, true-positive (metastases) or false-positive findings. Abnormal CECT findings, including true- and false-positive results, were detected in 65 patients (13.5%). Of these, 26 patients (5.4%) showed confirmed true metastatic disease, including 18 lung metastases, 11 liver metastases and 13 bone metastases. Upstaging to stage IV due to the results of the CECT scan occurred in 0 of 155 patients at stage I, 5 of 261 patients (1.9%) at stage II and 21 of 67 patients (31.3%) at stage III. The false-positive rates were 7.7, 9.0 and 8.7% in stages I, II and III, respectively. The size of the lung or liver metastasis was significantly larger than the false-positive lesion. Routine CECT did not appear to be useful for detecting distant metastases in completely asymptomatic patients. Conversely, a small number of patients were upstaged from early to stage IV and a predictive factor beyond T and N stage alone appears to be needed in order to predict which asymptomatic patients have distant metastases.

Entities:  

Year:  2012        PMID: 22740991      PMCID: PMC3362505          DOI: 10.3892/ol.2012.594

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncol Lett        ISSN: 1792-1074            Impact factor:   2.967


  13 in total

1.  Staging of breast cancer: new recommended standard procedure.

Authors:  Alberto Ravaioli; Giuseppe Pasini; Antonio Polselli; Maximilian Papi; Davide Tassinari; Valentina Arcangeli; Carlo Milandri; Dino Amadori; Matteo Bravi; Daniela Rossi; Pier Paolo Fattori; Enzo Pasquini; Ilaria Panzini
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 4.872

2.  Contrast-enhanced dedicated breast CT: initial clinical experience.

Authors:  Nicolas D Prionas; Karen K Lindfors; Shonket Ray; Shih-Ying Huang; Laurel A Beckett; Wayne L Monsky; John M Boone
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Multidetector row computed tomography for diagnosing intraductal extension of breast carcinoma.

Authors:  Takeo Fujita; Hiroyoshi Doihara; Daisuke Takabatake; Hirotoshi Takahashi; Seiji Yoshitomi; Yoichi Ishibe; Yutaka Ogasawara; Nobuyoshi Shimizu
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2005-07-01       Impact factor: 3.454

4.  Metastatic breast cancer confined to the skeletal system. An indolent disease.

Authors:  M M Sherry; F A Greco; D H Johnson; J D Hainsworth
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 4.965

5.  Baseline staging tests after a new diagnosis of breast cancer: further evidence of their limited indications.

Authors:  F Puglisi; A Follador; A M Minisini; G G Cardellino; S Russo; C Andreetta; S Di Terlizzi; A Piga
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 32.976

6.  The value of preoperative staging chest computed tomography to detect asymptomatic lung and liver metastasis in patients with primary breast carcinoma.

Authors:  Hyeyoung Kim; Wonshik Han; Hyeong-Gon Moon; Junwon Min; Soo-Kyung Ahn; Tae-You Kim; Seock-Ah Im; Do-Youn Oh; Sae-Won Han; Eui Kyu Chie; Sung Whan Ha; Dong-Young Noh
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2011-02-05       Impact factor: 4.872

7.  CT, MRI and ultrasound scanning rates: evaluation of cancer diagnosis, staging and surveillance in Ontario.

Authors:  Natalie Coburn; Raymond Przybysz; Lisa Barbera; David Hodgson; Sharon Sharir; Andreas Laupacis; Calvin Law
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2008-12-01       Impact factor: 3.454

8.  Comparison between positron emission tomography using 2-[fluorine-18]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose, conventional imaging and computed tomography for staging of breast cancer.

Authors:  S Mahner; S Schirrmacher; W Brenner; L Jenicke; C R Habermann; N Avril; J Dose-Schwarz
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2008-03-19       Impact factor: 32.976

9.  Perioperative screening for metastatic disease is not indicated in patients with primary breast cancer and no clinical signs of tumor spread.

Authors:  Bernd Gerber; Eva Seitz; Heiner Müller; Annette Krause; Toralf Reimer; Günther Kundt; Klaus Friese
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 4.872

10.  Screening chest imaging studies are not effective in the follow-up of breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Arti Hurria; Denis Leung; Kathleen Trainor; Larry Norton; Clifford Hudis
Journal:  J Oncol Manag       Date:  2003 Sep-Oct
View more
  6 in total

1.  Model and reconstruction of a K-edge contrast agent distribution with an X-ray photon-counting detector.

Authors:  Bo Meng; Wenxiang Cong; Yan Xi; Bruno De Man; Jian Yang; Ge Wang
Journal:  Opt Express       Date:  2017-04-17       Impact factor: 3.894

2.  Unwarranted imaging for distant metastases in patients with newly diagnosed ductal carcinoma in situ and stage I and II breast cancer

Authors:  Sasha Lupichuk; Derek Tilley; Brae Surgeoner; Karen King; Anil Abraham Joy
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2020-02-28       Impact factor: 2.089

3.  The role of staging Computed Tomography on detection of occult metastasis in asymptomatic breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Chrishanthi Rajasooriyar; Thamayanthy Sritharan; Suvithra Chenthuran; Kavitha Indranath; Rajendra Surenthirakumaran
Journal:  Cancer Rep (Hoboken)       Date:  2020-05-07

4.  Baseline staging imaging for distant metastasis in women with stages I, II, and III breast cancer.

Authors:  A Arnaout; N P Varela; M Allarakhia; L Grimard; A Hey; J Lau; L Thain; A Eisen
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 3.677

5.  Expanded criteria for pretreatment staging CT in breast cancer.

Authors:  N Roszkowski; S S Lam; E Copson; R I Cutress; R Oeppen
Journal:  BJS Open       Date:  2021-03-05

6.  Contrast-Enhanced CT-Based Radiomics Analysis in Predicting Lymphovascular Invasion in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Authors:  Yang Li; Meng Yu; Guangda Wang; Li Yang; Chongfei Ma; Mingbo Wang; Meng Yue; Mengdi Cong; Jialiang Ren; Gaofeng Shi
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-05-14       Impact factor: 6.244

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.