Literature DB >> 22740589

Reversible monensin adaptation in Enterococcus faecium, Enterococcus faecalis and Clostridium perfringens of cattle origin: potential impact on human food safety.

Shabbir Simjee1, Anna-Leigh Heffron, Andrew Pridmore, Thomas R Shryock.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To determine the stability/reversibility and mechanism of monensin adaptation in monensin-treated cattle isolates compared with reference bacterial isolates, exposed in vitro to high monensin concentrations.
METHODS: We evaluated the potential for cattle-origin strains of Clostridium perfringens, Enterococcus faecium and Enterococcus faecalis exposed to monensin in vivo (in vivo monensin-exposed isolates) to maintain or achieve the ability to grow in the presence of high monensin concentrations (in vitro monensin-adapted isolates). Twenty-one consecutive subcultures of the in vitro monensin-adapted strains were performed, and monensin MICs were determined for the 3rd, 7th, 14th and 21st subcultures (subcultured isolates). SDS-PAGE and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) were used to determine protein expression and visualize extracellular morphology changes.
RESULTS: Monensin-non-exposed isolates did not display monensin adaptation during in vitro monensin exposure. In contrast, in vivo monensin-exposed isolates displayed monensin adaptation enabling growth at 32× MIC. Upon consecutive subculturing, monensin MICs returned to baseline, or one dilution above, for the monensin-adapted strains. SDS-PAGE identified overexpression of a 14 kDa protein (C. perfringens) and a 20.5 kDa protein (E. faecium and E. faecalis) in the monensin-adapted isolates. TEM demonstrated that in vitro monensin-adapted strains had a significantly thicker cell wall or glycocalyx compared with in vivo monensin-exposed or subcultured isolates.
CONCLUSIONS: In vivo monensin-exposed isolates of C. perfringens, E. faecium and E. faecalis have the ability to grow in the presence of high monensin concentrations in vitro. This is associated with an increased thickening of the cell wall or glycocalyx that is reversible upon serial passage, suggesting a phenotypically expressed, but not genetically stable, trait.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22740589     DOI: 10.1093/jac/dks236

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother        ISSN: 0305-7453            Impact factor:   5.790


  8 in total

1.  Meta-analysis of the effects of monensin on growth and bloat of cattle on pasture.

Authors:  Shane Gadberry; David Lalman; Frank White; Sara Linneen; Paul Beck
Journal:  Transl Anim Sci       Date:  2022-03-04

2.  Stearylamine Liposomal Delivery of Monensin in Combination with Free Artemisinin Eliminates Blood Stages of Plasmodium falciparum in Culture and P. berghei Infection in Murine Malaria.

Authors:  Vinoth Rajendran; Shilpa Rohra; Mohsin Raza; Gulam Mustafa Hasan; Suparna Dutt; Prahlad C Ghosh
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2015-12-14       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  How Metabolic Diseases Impact the Use of Antimicrobials: A Formal Demonstration in the Field of Veterinary Medicine.

Authors:  Didier Raboisson; Maxime Barbier; Elise Maigné
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-10-07       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 4.  Hops (Humulus lupulus L.) Bitter Acids: Modulation of Rumen Fermentation and Potential As an Alternative Growth Promoter.

Authors:  Michael D Flythe; Isabelle A Kagan; Yuxi Wang; Nelmy Narvaez
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2017-08-21

5.  Redundancy in Anaerobic Digestion Microbiomes during Disturbances by the Antibiotic Monensin.

Authors:  Catherine M Spirito; Sarah E Daly; Jeffrey J Werner; Largus T Angenent
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2018-04-16       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Dosage-dependent effects of monensin on the rumen microbiota of lactating dairy cattle.

Authors:  Jeffery A McGarvey; Sara Place; Jeffrey Palumbo; Robert Hnasko; Frank Mitloehner
Journal:  Microbiologyopen       Date:  2018-12-18       Impact factor: 3.139

7.  Unknown Risk on the Farm: Does Agricultural Use of Ionophores Contribute to the Burden of Antimicrobial Resistance?

Authors:  Alex Wong
Journal:  mSphere       Date:  2019-09-25       Impact factor: 4.389

8.  Antimicrobial Resistance in Enterococcus Spp. Isolated from a Beef Processing Plant and Retail Ground Beef.

Authors:  Devin B Holman; Cassidy L Klima; Katherine E Gzyl; Rahat Zaheer; Cara Service; Tineke H Jones; Tim A McAllister
Journal:  Microbiol Spectr       Date:  2021-11-17
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.