Literature DB >> 22740340

New revised FIGO 2008 staging system for endometrial cancer produces better discrimination in survival compared with the 1988 staging system.

Tatsuya Kato1, Hidemichi Watari, Daisuke Endo, Takashi Mitamura, Tetsuji Odagiri, Yousuke Konno, Masayoshi Hosaka, Noriko Kobayashi, Yukiharu Todo, Satoko Sudo, Mahito Takeda, Peixin Dong, Masanori Kaneuchi, Masataka Kudo, Noriaki Sakuragi.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to analyze the stage migration and survival of endometrial cancer by the revised FIGO 2008 staging system compared with the 1988 staging system.
METHODS: A total of 355 patients with endometrial cancer, who underwent complete surgical staging, were enrolled. We compared the surgical stages and survival by FIGO 1988 staging system with those by FIGO 2008 staging system.
RESULTS: 2008 FIGO staging system resulted in an increase of stage I patients and decrease of stage II and IIIa patients. The 5-year overall survival (OS) rates for patients with 2008 FIGO stage IA and IB disease were 98.2% and 91.9%, respectively (P = 0.004). Five-year OS rate of new stage II (82.6%) was significantly worse than that of new stage IA (98.2%, P = 0.003). Patients with positive washing cytology alone revealed a 5-year OS rate similar to that of patients with new stage IIIA disease (96.2% vs. 90.9%, respectively; P = 0.53). The 5-year OS rate for patients with stage IIIC1 disease was improved compared with that for patients with stage IIIC2 disease (85.7% vs. 63.0%, respectively; P = 0.08).
CONCLUSION: New revised FIGO 2008 staging system for endometrial cancer produced better discrimination in OS outcomes compared with the 1988 system.
Copyright © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22740340     DOI: 10.1002/jso.23203

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Surg Oncol        ISSN: 0022-4790            Impact factor:   3.454


  3 in total

1.  FIGO 1988 versus 2009 staging for endometrial carcinoma: a comparative study on prediction of survival and stage distribution according to histologic subtype.

Authors:  Ulla-Maija Haltia; Ralf Bützow; Arto Leminen; Mikko Loukovaara
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2014-01-08       Impact factor: 4.401

2.  Adjuvant Treatment after Surgery in Stage IIIA Endometrial Adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Mee Sun Yoon; Seung Jae Huh; Hak Jae Kim; Young Seok Kim; Yong Bae Kim; Joo-Young Kim; Jong-Hoon Lee; Hun Jung Kim; Jihye Cha; Jin Hee Kim; Juree Kim; Won Sup Yoon; Jin Hwa Choi; Mison Chun; Youngmin Choi; Kang Kyoo Lee; Myungsoo Kim; Jae-Uk Jeong; Sei Kyung Chang; Won Park
Journal:  Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2015-10-29       Impact factor: 4.679

3.  Relaxin 2/RXFP1 Signaling Induces Cell Invasion via the β-Catenin Pathway in Endometrial Cancer.

Authors:  Misaki Fue; Yasuhiro Miki; Kiyoshi Takagi; Chiaki Hashimoto; Nobuo Yaegashi; Takashi Suzuki; Kiyoshi Ito
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2018-08-18       Impact factor: 5.923

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.