Literature DB >> 22740145

An indirect comparison of dabigatran, rivaroxaban and apixaban for atrial fibrillation.

Simon Mantha1, Jack Ansell.   

Abstract

New oral anticoagulant drugs are emerging as alternatives to warfarin for the prevention of stroke in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation. Two agents are direct factor Xa inhibitors (rivaroxaban and apixaban), and the third is a direct thrombin inhibitor (dabigatran). They have been separately compared to warfarin in large randomised trials. Our objective was to indirectly compare the three agents to each other for major efficacy and safety outcomes. Studies were assessed for comparability and the odds ratios of selected outcomes for each anticoagulant versus one another were estimated indirectly. The three cohorts differed significantly in terms of CHADS(2) score and the number of individuals with a past history of stroke, transient ischemic attack or systemic embolism. The estimated odds ratio of stroke or systemic embolism was 1.35 for rivaroxaban vs dabigatran 150 mg (p=0.04), 0.97 for rivaroxaban versus dabigatran 110 mg (p=0.81), 1.22 for apixaban versus dabigatran 150 mg (p=0.18), 0.88 for apixaban versus dabigatran 110 mg (p=0.34) and 0.90 for apixaban versus rivaroxaban (p=0.43). The estimated odds ratio of major bleeding was 1.10 for rivaroxaban versus dabigatran 150 mg (p=0.36), 1.28 for rivaroxaban versus dabigatran 110 mg (p=0.02), 0.74 for apixaban versus dabigatran 150 mg (p=0.004), 0.87 for apixaban versus dabigatran 110 mg (p=0.17) and 0.68 for apixaban versus rivaroxaban (p<0.001). In conclusion, the available data indicate no significant difference in efficacy between dabigatran 150 mg and apixaban for the prevention of stroke or systemic embolism in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation. It appears however that apixaban is associated with less major bleeding than dabigatran 150 mg or rivaroxaban and that rivaroxaban is less effective than dabigatran 150 mg in preventing stroke or systemic embolism. Such an indirect comparison should be used only to generate hypotheses which need to be tested in a dedicated randomised trial comparing the three drugs directly.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22740145     DOI: 10.1160/TH12-02-0093

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Thromb Haemost        ISSN: 0340-6245            Impact factor:   5.249


  43 in total

Review 1.  Approach to the new oral anticoagulants in family practice: part 1: comparing the options.

Authors:  James Douketis; Alan David Bell; John Eikelboom; Aaron Liew
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 3.275

2.  Real-World Direct Comparison of the Effectiveness and Safety of Apixaban, Dabigatran, Rivaroxaban, and Warfarin in Medicare Beneficiaries With Atrial Fibrillation.

Authors:  Lanting Yang; Maria M Brooks; Nancy W Glynn; Yuting Zhang; Samir Saba; Inmaculada Hernandez
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2020-04-10       Impact factor: 2.778

3.  Comparing Stroke and Bleeding with Rivaroxaban and Dabigatran in Atrial Fibrillation: Analysis of the US Medicare Part D Data.

Authors:  Inmaculada Hernandez; Yuting Zhang
Journal:  Am J Cardiovasc Drugs       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 3.571

4.  Indirect comparison of dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban and edoxaban for the treatment of acute venous thromboembolism.

Authors:  Simon Mantha; Jack Ansell
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 2.300

Review 5.  Dabigatran Etexilate: A Review in Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation.

Authors:  Hannah A Blair; Gillian M Keating
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 9.546

6.  New and old anti-thrombotic treatments for patients with atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Andrea Messori; Dario Maratea; Valeria Fadda; Sabrina Trippoli
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharm       Date:  2013-06

7.  Cost-effectiveness of apixaban vs. other new oral anticoagulants for the prevention of stroke: an analysis on patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation in the Greek healthcare setting.

Authors:  Kostas Athanasakis; Eleftheria Karampli; Dimitrios Tsounis; Aikaterini Bilitou; John Kyriopoulos
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 2.859

Review 8.  Cancer-related coagulopathy (Trousseau's syndrome): review of the literature and experience of a single center of internal medicine.

Authors:  Franco Dammacco; Angelo Vacca; Pasquale Procaccio; Roberto Ria; Ilaria Marech; Vito Racanelli
Journal:  Clin Exp Med       Date:  2013-03-02       Impact factor: 3.984

Review 9.  New oral anticoagulants in atrial fibrillation: a reappraisal of trial results looking at absolute figures.

Authors:  Sergio Coccheri; Donatella Orlando
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2012-12-18       Impact factor: 3.397

Review 10.  Apixaban: a review of its use for reducing the risk of stroke and systemic embolism in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Gillian M Keating
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 9.546

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.