BACKGROUND: In congenital aortic stenosis, chronic pressure load has detrimental effects on left ventricular (LV) systolic and diastolic function. Reduction in LV pressure load with balloon aortic valvuloplasty (BAVP) may improve diastolic function. METHODS AND RESULTS: Echocardiographic and catheterization data for 25 consecutive patients undergoing BAVP for congenital aortic stenosis were retrospectively analyzed. Median age at BAVP was 11.5 years (3.2-40.1). LV end-diastolic pressure was elevated (≥15 mm Hg) in 72% of patients, with a median of 17 mm Hg (range, 9-24). With BAVP, median aortic stenosis gradient was reduced from 63 mm Hg (range, 44-105) to 30 mm Hg (range, 10-43). Aortic regurgitation increased from trivial (none to mild) to mild (trivial to moderate). Pre-BAVP early diastolic mitral inflow velocity/tissue Doppler early diastolic velocity (E/E´) correlated with LV end-diastolic pressure (r=0.52, P=0.007). On follow-up echocardiography (median, 11 months after BAVP), aortic stenosis gradient was lower (P<0.001) and degree of AR was higher (P=0.01) compared with pre-BAVP echocardiograms. LV end-diastolic volume z-score increased (P=0.02), LV mass was unchanged, and LV mass:volume decreased (P=0.002). Mitral annular and septal E´ (P<0.001) were higher and E/E´ was lower after dilation (10.8 versus 14.2, P<0.001). Lower pre-BAVP E/E´ and lower pre-BAVP LV mass z-score were associated with lower post-BAVP E/E. CONCLUSION: After BAVP, LV remodeling characterized by an increase in EDV and decrease in LV mass:volume occurs and echocardiographic measures of diastolic function and LV end-diastolic pressure improve in most patients. Risk factors for persistent diastolic dysfunction include higher pre-BAVP LV mass z-score and worse pre-BAVP diastolic function.
BACKGROUND: In congenital aortic stenosis, chronic pressure load has detrimental effects on left ventricular (LV) systolic and diastolic function. Reduction in LV pressure load with balloon aortic valvuloplasty (BAVP) may improve diastolic function. METHODS AND RESULTS: Echocardiographic and catheterization data for 25 consecutive patients undergoing BAVP for congenital aortic stenosis were retrospectively analyzed. Median age at BAVP was 11.5 years (3.2-40.1). LV end-diastolic pressure was elevated (≥15 mm Hg) in 72% of patients, with a median of 17 mm Hg (range, 9-24). With BAVP, median aortic stenosis gradient was reduced from 63 mm Hg (range, 44-105) to 30 mm Hg (range, 10-43). Aortic regurgitation increased from trivial (none to mild) to mild (trivial to moderate). Pre-BAVP early diastolic mitral inflow velocity/tissue Doppler early diastolic velocity (E/E´) correlated with LV end-diastolic pressure (r=0.52, P=0.007). On follow-up echocardiography (median, 11 months after BAVP), aortic stenosis gradient was lower (P<0.001) and degree of AR was higher (P=0.01) compared with pre-BAVP echocardiograms. LV end-diastolic volume z-score increased (P=0.02), LV mass was unchanged, and LV mass:volume decreased (P=0.002). Mitral annular and septal E´ (P<0.001) were higher and E/E´ was lower after dilation (10.8 versus 14.2, P<0.001). Lower pre-BAVP E/E´ and lower pre-BAVP LV mass z-score were associated with lower post-BAVP E/E. CONCLUSION: After BAVP, LV remodeling characterized by an increase in EDV and decrease in LV mass:volume occurs and echocardiographic measures of diastolic function and LV end-diastolic pressure improve in most patients. Risk factors for persistent diastolic dysfunction include higher pre-BAVP LV mass z-score and worse pre-BAVP diastolic function.
Authors: Ralph A H Stewart; Andrew J Kerr; Gillian A Whalley; Malcolm E Legget; Irene Zeng; Michael J A Williams; John Lainchbury; Andrew Hamer; Robert Doughty; Mark A Richards; Harvey D White Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2010-05-31 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Ellen de Kort; Johan M Thijssen; Otto Daniëls; Chris L de Korte; Livia Kapusta Journal: Ultrasound Med Biol Date: 2006-07 Impact factor: 2.998
Authors: Stephane Heymans; Blanche Schroen; Pieter Vermeersch; Hendrik Milting; Fangye Gao; Astrid Kassner; Hilde Gillijns; Paul Herijgers; Willem Flameng; Peter Carmeliet; Frans Van de Werf; Yigal M Pinto; Stefan Janssens Journal: Circulation Date: 2005-08-15 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: D D Savage; R J Garrison; W B Kannel; D Levy; S J Anderson; J Stokes; M Feinleib; W P Castelli Journal: Circulation Date: 1987-01 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Allison C Hill; David W Brown; Steven D Colan; Kimberly Gauvreau; Pedro J del Nido; James E Lock; Rahul H Rathod Journal: Pediatr Cardiol Date: 2014-02-22 Impact factor: 1.655
Authors: Kevin G Friedman; David Schidlow; Lindsay Freud; Maria Escobar-Diaz; Wayne Tworetzky Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 2014-04-18 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: Renee Margossian; Lynn A Sleeper; Gail D Pearson; Piers C Barker; Luc Mertens; Michael D Quartermain; Jason T Su; Girish Shirali; Shan Chen; Steven D Colan Journal: J Am Soc Echocardiogr Date: 2016-09-10 Impact factor: 5.251
Authors: Hopewell N Ntsinjana; Robin Chung; Paolo Ciliberti; Vivek Muthurangu; Silvia Schievano; Jan Marek; Kim H Parker; Andrew M Taylor; Giovanni Biglino Journal: Front Pediatr Date: 2017-04-03 Impact factor: 3.418