Literature DB >> 22739773

Intraoperative visual evoked potential has no association with postoperative visual outcomes in transsphenoidal surgery.

Sang-Bong Chung1, Chan-Woo Park, Dae-Won Seo, Doo-Sik Kong, Sang-Ku Park.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to elucidate the relationship between changes in the intraoperative visual evoked potential (VEP) waveform and postoperative visual functional outcomes.
METHODS: Between February 2009 and December 2010, we performed endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal surgery for sellar or perisellar lesions in 65 consecutive patients with intraoperative VEP monitoring using scalp electrodes under total venous anesthesia. Among the 65 patients, 53 patients were followed-up with postoperative visual function evaluation. VEP waveforms measured at baseline were compared with those obtained toward the end of surgery and the association between changes in VEP waveforms and visual outcomes measured preoperatively and postoperatively were assessed. RESULT: Reproducible waveforms were obtained intraoperatively in 95 of 106 eyes (89.6%). Of the 95 eyes with reproducible VEP, 64 eyes had stable VEP during the surgery, 19 eyes showed VEP improvement, and 12 eyes had VEP deterioration. Of 64 eyes with a stable VEP, 42 showed no change in visual acuity postoperatively, 13 manifested improvement, and 9 worsened. Of 19 eyes with intraoperative VEP improvement, 13 exhibited no change, 4 improved, and 2 worsened postoperatively. Among 12 eyes with VEP deterioration, just 2 eyes showed visual worsening while the other 10 did not change or improved. Postoperative visual evaluation revealed no light perception in 2 eyes whose intraoperative VEP waveforms were stable throughout the surgery.
CONCLUSIONS: Intraoperative monitoring of VEP with scalp electrodes under total venous anesthesia had a reproducibility of 89.6% during transsphenoidal surgery for sellar or perisellar lesions. However, the intraoperative VEP waveforms showed no association with postoperative visual outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22739773     DOI: 10.1007/s00701-012-1426-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)        ISSN: 0001-6268            Impact factor:   2.216


  11 in total

1.  Neurophysiological intraoperative monitoring during an optic nerve schwannoma removal.

Authors:  Daniel San-Juan; Manuel Escanio Cortés; Martha Tena-Suck; Adolfo Josué Orozco Garduño; Jesús Alejandro López Pizano; Jonathan Villanueva Domínguez; Maricarmen Fernández Gónzalez-Aragón; Juan Luis Gómez-Amador
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2016-09-01       Impact factor: 2.502

2.  A pilot study to record visual evoked potentials during prone spine surgery using the SightSaver™ photic visual stimulator.

Authors:  E M Soffin; R G Emerson; J Cheng; K Mercado; K Smith; J D Beckman
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2017-12-20       Impact factor: 2.502

3.  Visual Outcomes after Surgery for Paraclinoid Aneurysms: A Fujita Experience.

Authors:  Raja K Kutty; Ambuj Kumar; Yasuhiro Yamada; Tsukosa Kawase; Riki Tanaka; Kyosuke Miyatani; Saeko Higashiguchi; Vigneswar Ravishankar; Katsumi Takizawa; Yoko Kato
Journal:  Asian J Neurosurg       Date:  2020-05-29

4.  Effectiveness of intraoperative visual evoked potential in avoiding visual deterioration during endonasal transsphenoidal surgery for pituitary tumors.

Authors:  Kentaro Toyama; Masahiko Wanibuchi; Toshimi Honma; Katsuya Komatsu; Yukinori Akiyama; Takeshi Mikami; Nobuhiro Mikuni
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2018-10-05       Impact factor: 3.042

Review 5.  Intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring: basic principles and recent update.

Authors:  Sung-Min Kim; Seung Hyun Kim; Dae-Won Seo; Kwang-Woo Lee
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2013-08-28       Impact factor: 2.153

6.  Clinical utility and limitations of intraoperative monitoring of visual evoked potentials.

Authors:  Yeda Luo; Luca Regli; Oliver Bozinov; Johannes Sarnthein
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-24       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Electroretinography during embolization of an ophthalmic arteriovenous fistula.

Authors:  David J Padalino; Vladyslav Melnyk; Geoffrey Allott; Eric M Deshaies
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2013-03-28

8.  Usefulness of intraoperative monitoring of visual evoked potentials in transsphenoidal surgery.

Authors:  Yoshinobu Kamio; Naoto Sakai; Tetsuro Sameshima; Goro Takahashi; Shinichiro Koizumi; Kenji Sugiyama; Hiroki Namba
Journal:  Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo)       Date:  2014-07-28       Impact factor: 1.742

Review 9.  Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring for Endoscopic Endonasal Approaches to the Skull Base: A Technical Guide.

Authors:  Harminder Singh; Richard W Vogel; Robert M Lober; Adam T Doan; Craig I Matsumoto; Tyler J Kenning; James J Evans
Journal:  Scientifica (Cairo)       Date:  2016-05-16

10.  Deep Learning for Automatically Visual Evoked Potential Classification During Surgical Decompression of Sellar Region Tumors.

Authors:  Nidan Qiao; Mengju Song; Zhao Ye; Wenqiang He; Zengyi Ma; Yongfei Wang; Yuyan Zhang; Xuefei Shou
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2019-11-20       Impact factor: 3.283

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.