Literature DB >> 22739656

Venous thromboembolism: annualised United States models for total, hospital-acquired and preventable costs utilising long-term attack rates.

Charles E Mahan1, Matthew E Borrego, Alex L Woersching, Robert Federici, Ross Downey, Jay Tiongson, Mark C Bieniarz, Brendan J Cavanaugh, Alex C Spyropoulos.   

Abstract

Healthcare reform is upon the United States (US) healthcare system. Prioritisation of preventative efforts will guide necessary transitions within the US healthcare system. While annual deep-vein thrombosis (DVT) costs have recently been defined at the US national level, annual pulmonary embolism (PE) and venous thromboembolism (VTE) costs have not yet been defined. A decision tree and cost model were developed to estimate US health care costs for total PE, total hospital-acquired PE, and total hospital-acquired "preventable" PE. The previously published DVT cost model was modified, updated and combined with the PE cost model to elucidate the same three categories of costs for VTE. Direct and indirect costs were also delineated. For VTE in the base model, annual cost ranges in 2011 US dollars for total, hospital- acquired, and hospital-acquired "preventable" costs and were $13.5-$27.2, $9.0-$18.2, and $4.5-$14.2 billion, respectively. The first sensitivity analysis, with higher incidence rates and costs, demonstrated annual US total, hospital-acquired, and hospital-acquired "preventable" VTE costs ranging from $32.1-$69.3, $23.7-$51.5, and $11.9-$39.3 billion, respectively. The second sensitivity analysis with long-term attack rates (LTAR) for recurrent events and post-thrombotic syndrome and chronic pulmonary thromboembolic hypertension demonstrated annual US total, hospital-acquired, and hospital-acquired "preventable" VTE costs ranging from $15.4-$34.4, $10.3-$25.4, and $5.1-$19.1 billion, respectively. PE costs comprised a majority of the VTE costs. Prioritisation of effective VTE preventative strategies will reduce significant costs, morbidity and mortality within the US healthcare system. The cost models may be utilised to estimate other countries' costs or VTE-specific disease states.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22739656     DOI: 10.1160/TH12-03-0162

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Thromb Haemost        ISSN: 0340-6245            Impact factor:   5.249


  32 in total

Review 1.  The economic burden of incident venous thromboembolism in the United States: A review of estimated attributable healthcare costs.

Authors:  Scott D Grosse; Richard E Nelson; Kwame A Nyarko; Lisa C Richardson; Gary E Raskob
Journal:  Thromb Res       Date:  2015-11-24       Impact factor: 3.944

2.  A 1-year drug utilization evaluation of protamine in hospitalized patients to identify possible future roles of heparin and low molecular weight heparin reversal agents.

Authors:  Charles E Mahan
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 2.300

3.  Cost-effectiveness of bevacizumab and ranibizumab for newly diagnosed neovascular macular degeneration.

Authors:  Joshua D Stein; Paula Anne Newman-Casey; Tavag Mrinalini; Paul P Lee; David W Hutton
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2014-01-07       Impact factor: 12.079

Review 4.  Regulatory, legislative, and policy updates with anticoagulant use.

Authors:  John Fanikos; Leo F Buckley; Ahmed Aldemerdash; Kimberly J Terry; Gregory Piazza; Jean M Connors; Samuel Z Goldhaber
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 2.300

5.  Outcomes in adults with acute pulmonary embolism who are discharged from emergency departments: the Cardiovascular Research Network Venous Thromboembolism study.

Authors:  Margaret C Fang; Dongjie Fan; Sue Hee Sung; Daniel M Witt; Steven H Yale; Steven R Steinhubl; Alan S Go
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 21.873

6.  National Trends in Ambulatory Oral Anticoagulant Use.

Authors:  Geoffrey D Barnes; Eleanor Lucas; G Caleb Alexander; Zachary D Goldberger
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2015-07-02       Impact factor: 4.965

7.  Predictors of Venous Thromboembolism After Nonemergent Craniotomy: A Nationwide Readmission Database Analysis.

Authors:  Ian A Buchanan; Michelle Lin; Daniel A Donoho; Arati Patel; Li Ding; Arun P Amar; Steven L Giannotta; William J Mack; Frank Attenello
Journal:  World Neurosurg       Date:  2018-11-20       Impact factor: 2.104

Review 8.  The future of inpatient anticoagulation management.

Authors:  Allison E Burnett; Toby C Trujillo
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 2.300

Review 9.  Is thromboprophylaxis cost effective in ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: A systematic review and cost analysis.

Authors:  Kelly Comerford Wormer; Ayesha A Jangda; Farah A El Sayed; Katherine I Stewart; Sunni L Mumford; James H Segars
Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol       Date:  2018-03-19       Impact factor: 2.435

10.  Cost-effectiveness of bevacizumab and ranibizumab for newly diagnosed neovascular macular degeneration (an American Ophthalmological Society thesis).

Authors:  Joshua D Stein; Paula Anne Newman-Casey; Tavag Mrinalini; Paul P Lee; David W Hutton
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  2013-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.