Literature DB >> 22739137

Raising orphans: how clinical development programs of drugs for rare and common diseases are different.

M Orfali1, L Feldman, V Bhattacharjee, P Harkins, S Kadam, C Lo, M Ravi, D T Shringarpure, J Mardekian, C Cassino, T Coté.   

Abstract

We compared clinical trials described in package inserts from noncancer orphan and nonorphan drugs from 1 January 2001 to 31 December 2011. Among the 37 orphan and 58 nonorphan drugs approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (US FDA) during this period, orphans had fewer clinical trials (2.8 vs. 3.5, P < 0.05) and fewer total participants (390 vs. 2,566, P < 0.001), but proportions with randomization, blinding, and placebo-controlled clinical end points were similar, as were development times. We conclude that small studies of appropriate design can support US FDA approval of new medicines for rare diseases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22739137     DOI: 10.1038/clpt.2012.87

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther        ISSN: 0009-9236            Impact factor:   6.875


  8 in total

Review 1.  Designing clinical trials for dystonia.

Authors:  Wendy R Galpern; Christopher S Coffey; Alberto Albanese; Ken Cheung; Cynthia L Comella; Dixie J Ecklund; Stanley Fahn; Joseph Jankovic; Karl Kieburtz; Anthony E Lang; Michael P McDermott; Jeremy M Shefner; Jan K Teller; John L P Thompson; Sharon D Yeatts; H A Jinnah
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 7.620

2.  Emerging Genetic Counselor Roles within the Biotechnology and Pharmaceutical Industries: as Industry Interest Grows in Rare Genetic Disorders, How are Genetic Counselors Joining the Discussion?

Authors:  Tessa Field; Stephanie Jo Brewster; Meghan Towne; MaryAnn W Campion
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2016-03-28       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  Establishing a reasonable price for an orphan drug.

Authors:  Mikel Berdud; Michael Drummond; Adrian Towse
Journal:  Cost Eff Resour Alloc       Date:  2020-09-04

4.  Sustainable rare diseases business and drug access: no time for misconceptions.

Authors:  Pierrick Rollet; Adrien Lemoine; Marc Dunoyer
Journal:  Orphanet J Rare Dis       Date:  2013-07-23       Impact factor: 4.123

Review 5.  Systematic review of available evidence on 11 high-priced inpatient orphan drugs.

Authors:  Tim A Kanters; Caroline de Sonneville-Koedoot; W Ken Redekop; Leona Hakkaart
Journal:  Orphanet J Rare Dis       Date:  2013-08-16       Impact factor: 4.123

6.  A comparison of interventional clinical trials in rare versus non-rare diseases: an analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov.

Authors:  Stuart A Bell; Catrin Tudur Smith
Journal:  Orphanet J Rare Dis       Date:  2014-11-26       Impact factor: 4.123

7.  Characteristics of clinical trials in rare vs. common diseases: A register-based Latvian study.

Authors:  Konstantins Logviss; Dainis Krievins; Santa Purvina
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-04-03       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Evidence supporting regulatory-decision making on orphan medicinal products authorisation in Europe: methodological uncertainties.

Authors:  Caridad Pontes; Juan Manuel Fontanet; Roser Vives; Aranzazu Sancho; Mònica Gómez-Valent; José Ríos; Rosa Morros; Jorge Martinalbo; Martin Posch; Armin Koch; Kit Roes; Katrien Oude Rengerink; Josep Torrent-Farnell; Ferran Torres
Journal:  Orphanet J Rare Dis       Date:  2018-11-15       Impact factor: 4.123

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.