Sanda Despa1, Jerry B Lingrel, Donald M Bers. 1. Department of Pharmacology, University of California at Davis, Genome Building Rm 3513, Davis, CA 95616-8636, USA.
Abstract
AIMS: Na(+)/K(+)-ATPase (NKA) is essential in regulating [Na(+)](i), and thus cardiac myocyte Ca(2+) and contractility via Na(+)/Ca(2+) exchange. Different NKA-α subunit isoforms are present in the heart and may differ functionally, depending on specific membrane localization. In smooth muscle and astrocytes, NKA-α2 is located at the junctions with the endo(sarco)plasmic reticulum, where they could regulate local [Na(+)], and indirectly junctional cleft [Ca(2+)]. Whether this model holds for cardiac myocytes is unclear. METHODS AND RESULTS: The ouabain-resistant NKA-α1 cannot be selectively blocked to assess its effect. To overcome this, we used mice in which NKA-α1 is ouabain sensitive and NKA-α2 is ouabain resistant (SWAP mice). We measured the effect of ouabain at low concentration on [Na(+)](i), Ca(2+) transients, and the fractional sarcoplasmic reticulum (SR) Ca(2+) release in cardiac myocytes from wild-type (WT; NKA-α2 inhibition) and SWAP mice (selective NKA-α1 block). At baseline, Na(+) and Ca(2+) regulations are similar in WT and SWAP mice. For equal levels of total NKA inhibition (~25%), ouabain significantly increased Ca(2+) transients (from ΔF/F(0)= 1.5 ± 0.1 to 1.8 ± 0.1), and fractional SR Ca(2+) release (from 24 ± 3 to 29 ± 3%) in WT (NKA-α2 block) but not in SWAP myocytes (NKA-α1 block). This occurred despite a similar and modest increase in [Na(+)](i) (~2 mM) in both groups. The effect in WT mice was mediated specifically by NKA-α2 inhibition because at a similar concentration ouabain had no effect in transgenic mice where both NKA-α1 and NKA-α2 are ouabain resistant. CONCLUSION: NKA-α2 has a more prominent role (vs. NKA-α1) in modulating cardiac myocyte SR Ca(2+) release.
AIMS: Na(+)/K(+)-ATPase (NKA) is essential in regulating [Na(+)](i), and thus cardiac myocyte Ca(2+) and contractility via Na(+)/Ca(2+) exchange. Different NKA-α subunit isoforms are present in the heart and may differ functionally, depending on specific membrane localization. In smooth muscle and astrocytes, NKA-α2 is located at the junctions with the endo(sarco)plasmic reticulum, where they could regulate local [Na(+)], and indirectly junctional cleft [Ca(2+)]. Whether this model holds for cardiac myocytes is unclear. METHODS AND RESULTS: The ouabain-resistant NKA-α1 cannot be selectively blocked to assess its effect. To overcome this, we used mice in which NKA-α1 is ouabain sensitive and NKA-α2 is ouabain resistant (SWAP mice). We measured the effect of ouabain at low concentration on [Na(+)](i), Ca(2+) transients, and the fractional sarcoplasmic reticulum (SR) Ca(2+) release in cardiac myocytes from wild-type (WT; NKA-α2 inhibition) and SWAP mice (selective NKA-α1 block). At baseline, Na(+) and Ca(2+) regulations are similar in WT and SWAP mice. For equal levels of total NKA inhibition (~25%), ouabain significantly increased Ca(2+) transients (from ΔF/F(0)= 1.5 ± 0.1 to 1.8 ± 0.1), and fractional SR Ca(2+) release (from 24 ± 3 to 29 ± 3%) in WT (NKA-α2 block) but not in SWAP myocytes (NKA-α1 block). This occurred despite a similar and modest increase in [Na(+)](i) (~2 mM) in both groups. The effect in WT mice was mediated specifically by NKA-α2 inhibition because at a similar concentration ouabain had no effect in transgenic mice where both NKA-α1 and NKA-α2 are ouabain resistant. CONCLUSION: NKA-α2 has a more prominent role (vs. NKA-α1) in modulating cardiac myocyte SR Ca(2+) release.
Authors: Christopher R Weber; Valentino Piacentino; Kenneth S Ginsburg; Steven R Houser; Donald M Bers Journal: Circ Res Date: 2002-02-08 Impact factor: 17.367
Authors: Sanda Despa; Mohammed A Islam; Christopher R Weber; Steven M Pogwizd; Donald M Bers Journal: Circulation Date: 2002-05-28 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Iva Dostanic; John N Lorenz; Jo El J Schultz; Ingrid L Grupp; Jonathan C Neumann; Maqsood A Wani; Jerry B Lingrel Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2003-10-14 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: Amy E Moseley; Justin P Huddleson; Cynthia S Bohanan; Paul F James; John N Lorenz; Bruce J Aronow; Jerry B Lingrel Journal: Cell Physiol Biochem Date: 2005
Authors: Taku Yamamoto; Zhi Su; Amy E Moseley; Toshie Kadono; John Zhang; Marc Cougnon; Fenghua Li; Jerry B Lingrel; William H Barry Journal: J Mol Cell Cardiol Date: 2005-07 Impact factor: 5.000
Authors: Mordecai P Blaustein; Ling Chen; John M Hamlyn; Frans H H Leenen; Jerry B Lingrel; W Gil Wier; Jin Zhang Journal: J Physiol Date: 2016-07-31 Impact factor: 5.182
Authors: Adriana Katz; Daniel M Tal; Dan Heller; Michael Habeck; Efrat Ben Zeev; Bilal Rabah; Yaniv Bar Kana; Arie L Marcovich; Steven J D Karlish Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2015-10-19 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Robert N Correll; Petra Eder; Adam R Burr; Sanda Despa; Jennifer Davis; Donald M Bers; Jeffery D Molkentin Journal: Circ Res Date: 2013-11-11 Impact factor: 17.367