Literature DB >> 2273875

Evaluation of magnetic resonance velocimetry for steady flow.

D N Ku1, C L Biancheri, R I Pettigrew, J W Peifer, C P Markou, H Engels.   

Abstract

Whole body magnetic resonance (MR) imaging has recently become an important diagnostic tool for cardiovascular diseases. The technique of magnetic resonance phase velocity encoding allows the quantitative measurement of velocity for an arbitrary component direction. A study was initiated to determine the ability and accuracy of MR velocimetry to measure a wide range of flow conditions including flow separation, three-dimensional secondary flow, high velocity gradients, and turbulence. A steady flow system pumped water doped with manganese chloride through a variety of test sections. Images were produced using gradient echo sequences on test sections including a straight tube, a curved tube, a smoothly converging-diverging nozzle, and an orifice. Magnetic resonance measurements of laminar and turbulent flows were depicted as cross-sectional velocity profiles. MR velocity measurements revealed such flow behavior as spatially varying velocity, recirculation and secondary flows over a wide range of conditions. Comparisons made with published experimental laser Doppler anemometry measurements and theoretical calculations for similar flow conditions revealed excellent accuracy and precision levels. The successful measurement of velocity profiles for a variety of flow conditions and geometries indicate that magnetic resonance imaging is an accurate, non-contacting velocimeter.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2273875     DOI: 10.1115/1.2891212

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech Eng        ISSN: 0148-0731            Impact factor:   2.097


  7 in total

1.  New ways of performing in vivo flow velocity measurements in the basilar artery.

Authors:  J Ravensbergen; M Tarnawski; E M Vriens; B Hillen; C G Caro; A C Van Huffelen
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 2.804

2.  Comparing velocity and fluid shear stress in a stenotic phantom with steady flow: phase-contrast MRI, particle image velocimetry and computational fluid dynamics.

Authors:  Iman Khodarahmi
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2014-12-12       Impact factor: 2.310

3.  Quantification of hemodynamic wall shear stress in patients with bicuspid aortic valve using phase-contrast MRI.

Authors:  Alex J Barker; Craig Lanning; Robin Shandas
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2009-12-02       Impact factor: 3.934

Review 4.  Phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging to assess renal perfusion: a systematic review and statement paper.

Authors:  Giulia Villa; Steffen Ringgaard; Ingo Hermann; Rebecca Noble; Paolo Brambilla; Dinah S Khatir; Frank G Zöllner; Susan T Francis; Nicholas M Selby; Andrea Remuzzi; Anna Caroli
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2019-08-17       Impact factor: 2.310

5.  CSF flow quantification of the cerebral aqueduct in normal volunteers using phase contrast cine MR imaging.

Authors:  Jeong Hyun Lee; Ho Kyu Lee; Jae Kyun Kim; Hyun Jeong Kim; Ji Kang Park; Choong Gon Choi
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2004 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 3.500

Review 6.  Measurement in opaque flows: a review of measurement techniques for dispersed multiphase flows.

Authors:  Christian Poelma
Journal:  Acta Mech       Date:  2020-05-13       Impact factor: 2.698

7.  NO-HYPE: a novel hydrodynamic phantom for the evaluation of MRI flow measurements.

Authors:  Giacomo Gadda; Sirio Cocozza; Mauro Gambaccini; Angelo Taibi; Enrico Tedeschi; Paolo Zamboni; Giuseppe Palma
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2021-08-08       Impact factor: 2.602

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.