INTRODUCTION: While previous studies have noted that hypogonadism (HG) may pose a significant economic and quality-of-life burden, no studies have evaluated the impact of HG on healthcare utilization and costs in the United States. AIM: Compare direct (health care) and indirect (disability leave or medical absence) costs between privately insured U.S. employees with HG and controls without HG. METHODS: The study sample included 4,269 male employees, ages 35-64, with ≥ 2 HG diagnoses (International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification: 257.2x) or ≥ 1 HG diagnosis and ≥ 1 claim for testosterone therapy, 1/1/2005-3/31/2009, identified from a large, private insurance administrative database that includes medical, prescription drug, and disability claims data. The index date was the most recent HG diagnosis that had continuous eligibility for at least 1 year before (baseline period) and 1 year after (study period). Employees with HG were matched 1:1 on age, region, salaried vs. nonsalaried employment status, and index year to controls without HG. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Descriptive analyses compared demographic characteristics, comorbidities, resource utilization, direct and indirect costs inflated to USD 2009. Multivariate analyses adjusting for baseline characteristics were used to estimate risk-adjusted costs. RESULTS: HG employees and controls had a mean age of 51 years. HG employees compared with controls had higher baseline comorbidity rates, including hyperlipidemia (50.2% vs. 25.3%), hypertension (37.7% vs. 21.1%), back/neck pain (32.0% vs. 15.7%), and human immunodeficiency virus/acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (7.1% vs. 0.3%) (all P < 0.0001). HG employees had higher mean study period direct ($10,914 vs. $3,823) and indirect costs ($3,204 vs. $1,450); HG-related direct costs were $832 (all P < 0.0001). Risk-adjusted direct ($9,291 vs. $5,248) and indirect ($2,729 vs. $1,840) costs were also higher for HG employees (all P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Employees with HG had higher comorbidity rates and costs compared with controls. Given the low HG-related costs, a primary driver of costs among HG patients appears to be their comorbidity burden.
INTRODUCTION: While previous studies have noted that hypogonadism (HG) may pose a significant economic and quality-of-life burden, no studies have evaluated the impact of HG on healthcare utilization and costs in the United States. AIM: Compare direct (health care) and indirect (disability leave or medical absence) costs between privately insured U.S. employees with HG and controls without HG. METHODS: The study sample included 4,269 male employees, ages 35-64, with ≥ 2 HG diagnoses (International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification: 257.2x) or ≥ 1 HG diagnosis and ≥ 1 claim for testosterone therapy, 1/1/2005-3/31/2009, identified from a large, private insurance administrative database that includes medical, prescription drug, and disability claims data. The index date was the most recent HG diagnosis that had continuous eligibility for at least 1 year before (baseline period) and 1 year after (study period). Employees with HG were matched 1:1 on age, region, salaried vs. nonsalaried employment status, and index year to controls without HG. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Descriptive analyses compared demographic characteristics, comorbidities, resource utilization, direct and indirect costs inflated to USD 2009. Multivariate analyses adjusting for baseline characteristics were used to estimate risk-adjusted costs. RESULTS: HG employees and controls had a mean age of 51 years. HG employees compared with controls had higher baseline comorbidity rates, including hyperlipidemia (50.2% vs. 25.3%), hypertension (37.7% vs. 21.1%), back/neck pain (32.0% vs. 15.7%), and human immunodeficiency virus/acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (7.1% vs. 0.3%) (all P < 0.0001). HG employees had higher mean study period direct ($10,914 vs. $3,823) and indirect costs ($3,204 vs. $1,450); HG-related direct costs were $832 (all P < 0.0001). Risk-adjusted direct ($9,291 vs. $5,248) and indirect ($2,729 vs. $1,840) costs were also higher for HG employees (all P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Employees with HG had higher comorbidity rates and costs compared with controls. Given the low HG-related costs, a primary driver of costs among HG patients appears to be their comorbidity burden.
Authors: Huanguang Jia; Charles T Sullivan; Sean C McCoy; Joshua F Yarrow; Matthew Morrow; Stephen E Borst Journal: World J Clin Cases Date: 2015-04-16 Impact factor: 1.337
Authors: Randall J Urban; E L Dillon; S Choudhary; Y Zhao; A M Horstman; R G Tilton; M Sheffield-Moore Journal: Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc Date: 2014
Authors: Eleanor L Watts; Paul N Appleby; Demetrius Albanes; Amanda Black; June M Chan; Chu Chen; Piera M Cirillo; Barbara A Cohn; Michael B Cook; Jenny L Donovan; Luigi Ferrucci; Cedric F Garland; Graham G Giles; Phyllis J Goodman; Laurel A Habel; Christopher A Haiman; Jeff M P Holly; Robert N Hoover; Rudolf Kaaks; Paul Knekt; Laurence N Kolonel; Tatsuhiko Kubo; Loïc Le Marchand; Tapio Luostarinen; Robert J MacInnis; Hanna O Mäenpää; Satu Männistö; E Jeffrey Metter; Roger L Milne; Abraham M Y Nomura; Steven E Oliver; J Kellogg Parsons; Petra H Peeters; Elizabeth A Platz; Elio Riboli; Fulvio Ricceri; Sabina Rinaldi; Harri Rissanen; Norie Sawada; Catherine A Schaefer; Jeannette M Schenk; Frank Z Stanczyk; Meir Stampfer; Pär Stattin; Ulf-Håkan Stenman; Anne Tjønneland; Antonia Trichopoulou; Ian M Thompson; Shoichiro Tsugane; Lars Vatten; Alice S Whittemore; Regina G Ziegler; Naomi E Allen; Timothy J Key; Ruth C Travis Journal: PLoS One Date: 2017-12-27 Impact factor: 3.752