Literature DB >> 22738331

Prolonged percutaneous SNM testing does not cause infection-related explanation.

Bastian Amend1, Jens Bedke, Mahmoud Khalil, Arnulf Stenzl, Karl-Dietrich Sievert.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: WHAT'S KNOWN ON THE SUBJECT? AND WHAT DOES THE STUDY ADD?: Sacral neuromodulation (SNM) is an effective treatment option of different pelvic-related dysfunctions. SNM evaluation by either temporary or permanent electrodes is generally accepted. Extended testing with temporary electrodes has been reported on before but less is known about infection-related risks during prolonged evaluation with definitive electrodes. The present findings show that prolonged testing (mean = 52.3 days) with permanent electrodes does not increase infection-associated explantation rates, although bacterial colonization was found in more than one-third of the patients. Prolonged SNM evaluation under everyday conditions might improve long-term success.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of prolonged stage 1 testing on bacterial electrode colonization, infection and treatment success.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In all, 21 patients who underwent sacral neuromodulation (SNM) for periods ≥1 month were prospectively evaluated; nine patients had overactive bladder syndrome (OAB), 10 had urinary retention, two had faecal incontinence (FI), and 13 had diabetes and overweight/obesity. After stage 1 testing electrode extension leads were microbiologically analysed to assess bacterial colonization. The primary measurements were pre- and post-SNM treatment comparisons based on patient-agreed criteria using an increased 70% minimum improvement rate; secondary measurements were bacterial colonization and impact of infection.
RESULTS: The mean stage 1 evaluation period was 52.3 days; 16 patients (76%) progressed to stage 2, and five patients were explanted due to inadequate improvement (<70%). There was bacterial colonization in 42.9% of patients and 38.2% of extension leads. Stage 2 patients showed no infection or wound-healing disorders at a mean follow-up of 33.9 months. The success rate for stage 2 implantation treatment was 94%.
CONCLUSIONS: There are few studies in the literature evaluating SNM testing periods vs the risk of clinically relevant implant infection rates. The present study shows that prolonged testing could potentially enhance treatment efficacy without infection-related explantations of the chronic implant, despite the identification of bacteria. SNM-implanted patients with diabetes mellitus or obesity should be followed closely. Clinicians might consider using prolonged testing under everyday conditions. Prolonged SNM stage 1 testing is a very effective minimally invasive treatment option to evaluate pelvic-related dysfunction.
© 2012 BJU International.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22738331     DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11263.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJU Int        ISSN: 1464-4096            Impact factor:   5.588


  4 in total

Review 1.  Sacral Neuromodulation Implant Infection: Risk Factors and Prevention.

Authors:  Calvin Lee; Javier Pizarro-Berdichevsky; Marisa M Clifton; Sandip P Vasavada
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 2.  Electrical neuromodulation in the management of lower urinary tract dysfunction: evidence, experience and future prospects.

Authors:  Alejandro Abello; Anurag K Das
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2018-02-22

Review 3.  Infection Rates of Electrical Leads Used for Percutaneous Neurostimulation of the Peripheral Nervous System.

Authors:  Brian M Ilfeld; Rodney A Gabriel; Michael F Saulino; John Chae; P Hunter Peckham; Stuart A Grant; Christopher A Gilmore; Michael C Donohue; Matthew G deBock; Amorn Wongsarnpigoon; Joseph W Boggs
Journal:  Pain Pract       Date:  2016-11-11       Impact factor: 3.183

4.  Effects of Appropriate Prolonged Sacral Neuromodulation Testing in Improving Implantation Rate of a Permanent Implantable Pulse Generator in Patients with Refractory Lower Urinary Tract Dysfunctions in Mainland China.

Authors:  Peng Zhang; Jian-Zhong Zhang; Li-Yang Wu; Xiao-Dong Zhang
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2017-02-20       Impact factor: 2.628

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.