| Literature DB >> 22738323 |
Tomoko Morinaka1, Malgorzata Wozniewicz, Jan Jeszka, Joanna Bajerska, Porn-ngarm Limtrakul, Luksana Makonkawkeyoon, Naoko Hirota, Shoko Kumagai, Yoshiaki Sone.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: From the viewpoint of human physiological adaptability, we previously investigated seasonal variation in the amount of unabsorbed dietary carbohydrates from the intestine after breakfast in Japanese, Polish and Thai participants. In this investigation we found that there were significant seasonal variations in the amount of unabsorbed dietary carbohydrates in Japanese and Polish participants, while we could not find significant seasonal variation in Thai participants. These facts prompted us to examine seasonal variations in the respiratory quotient after an overnight fast (an indicator of the ratio of carbohydrate and fat oxidized after the last meal) with female university students living in Osaka (Japan), Poznan (Poland) and Chiang Mai (Thailand).Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22738323 PMCID: PMC3404962 DOI: 10.1186/1880-6805-31-10
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Physiol Anthropol ISSN: 1880-6791 Impact factor: 2.867
Monthly mean temperature and precipitation in Osaka, Poznan and Chiang Mai
| Temperature (°C) | 15.4(15.1) | 20.0(19.7) | 28.7(27.4) | 28.4(28.8) | 19.6(19.0) | 13.4(13.6) | 6.5(6.0) | 7.9(6.3) |
| Precipitation (mm) | 144.0(103.8) | 219.0(145.5) | 124.0(157.0) | 82.0(90.9) | 62.0(112.3) | 50.0(69.3) | 73.0(45.4) | 95.0(61.7) |
| Temperature (°C) | 12.1(8.7) | 13.6(13.9) | 19.5(18.9) | 19.6(18.3) | 7.5(8.9) | 6.6(3.8) | −6.5(−0.9) | −1.0(0.0) |
| Precipitation (mm) | 20.0(31.6) | 86.0(48.1) | 86.0(74.3) | 24.0(58.5) | 52.0(32.4) | 35.0(34.6) | 28.0(33.3) | 18.0(28.4) |
| Temperature (°C) | 29.6(29.3) | 28.5(28.7) | 27.8(27.5) | 28.0(27.3) | 27.4(26.5) | 25.1(24.3) | 24.2(22.0) | 24.5(24.0) |
| Precipitation (mm) | 98.0(57.9) | 142.0(158.8) | 124.0(135.4) | 126.0(208.4) | 223.0(117.6) | 0.0(58.5) | 22.0(4.1) | 0.0(9.5) |
The figures shows monthly mean temperature and precipitation in the year of the respiratory quotient examination and those in parenthesis are the average of 1981 to 2010. These data were obtained from the metrological information of Japan Meteorological Agency (http://www.data.jma.go.jp/gmd/cpd/climatview_jp/index.html[30]).
Characteristics of the participants
| Age (years) | 18.3 ± 0.6(18 to 20) | 21.0 ± 1.4(19 to 23) | 22.9 ± 2.7(18 to 27) |
| Height (cm) | 160.0 ± 5.6(152.8 to 174.5) | 168.9 ± 6.8(150.0 to 181.5) | 159.1 ± 5.3(149.0 to 170.0) |
| Weight (kg) | 49.8 ± 5.5(39.6 to 58.6) | 58.2 ± 7.7(46.3 to 74.6) | 46.7 ± 5.6(38.9 to 60.3) |
| Body mass index (kg/m2) | 19.5 ± 2.0(16.8 to 23.7) | 20.4 ± 2.2(17.3 to 25.2) | 18.4 ± 2.0(15.7 to 22.8) |
| Body fat (%) | 22.5 ± 3.9(13.1 to 29.7) | 24.4 ± 3.9(17.0 to 36.0) | 22.9 ± 3.7(16.6 to 29.8) |
The values are mean, standard deviation, and range of characteristics. These values were obtained when the examination started, Apr to May 2008 for Japan and on Apr to May 2009 for Poland and Thailand.
Figure 1Experimental protocol. The protocol was the same in the four seasons and in the three populations.
Summary of nutrients intake and carbohydrate to fat intake ratio of Japanese and Polish participants
| | | | | ||
| Apr to May | 1685.2 ± 429.5 | 14.1 ± 2.0 | 29.0 ± 7.4 | 56.4 ± 7.6 | 2.12 ± 0.79 |
| Jul to Aug | 1745.1 ± 441.1 | 13.9 ± 2.0 | 28.8 ± 4.3 | 56.7 ± 4.7 | 2.03 ± 0.45 |
| Oct to Nov | 1716.3 ± 479.4 | 13.8 ± 1.5 | 27.4 ± 5.0 | 58.6 ± 4.9 | 2.24 ± 0.62 |
| Jan to Feb | 1608.0 ± 493.2 | 14.6 ± 2.0 | 28.1 ± 5.1 | 56.6 ± 5.8 | 2.11 ± 0.57 |
| | | | | ||
| Apr to May | 1858.5 ± 406.8 | 16.2 ± 2.3 | 33.5 ± 5.5 | 48.9 ± 6.0a | 1.53 ± 0.42a |
| Jul to Aug | 1856.7 ± 674.4 | 15.4 ± 2.2 | 30.7 ± 3.8 | 52.7 ± 4.1a | 1.76 ± 0.34a |
| Oct to Nov | 1846.3 ± 576.4 | 14.8 ± 2.5 | 32.6 ± 6.3 | 51.0 ± 7.7 | 1.68 ± 0.66 |
| Jan to Feb | 1742.1 ± 561.0 | 15.1 ± 2.2 | 33.1 ± 5.3 | 50.2 ± 6.2 | 1.58 ± 0.42 |
The C/F ratio is expressed by as the percentage of energy from carbohydrate intake divided by the percentage of energy from fat intake. These values are those of Japanese and Polish participants who participated in RQ and body fat examination. aMeans sharing a common superscript letter are significantly different, P <0.05. C/F ratio: carbohydrate to fat intake ratio.
Summary of the mean and standard deviations of the measurements
| Apr to May | 0.812 ± 0.034a | 22.5 ± 3.9a | 49.8 ± 5.5 |
| Jul to Aug | 0.802 ± 0.055b | 20.7 ± 4.4abc | 49.1 ± 5.1 |
| Oct to Nov | 0.833 ± 0.040 | 23.3 ± 5.1b | 49.4 ± 5.7 |
| Jan to Feb | 0.838 ± 0.045ab | 23.5 ± 4.3c | 50.1 ± 6.3 |
| Apr to May | 0.816 ± 0.035 | 24.4 ± 3.9 | 58.2 ± 7.7 |
| Jul to Aug | 0.811 ± 0.043 | 23.9 ± 3.8ab | 58.0 ± 7.7a |
| Oct to Nov | 0.816 ± 0.040 | 25.3 ± 3.8a | 59.1 ± 8.3a |
| Jan to Feb | 0.823 ± 0.035 | 25.1 ± 3.8b | 58.3 ± 7.9 |
| Apr to May | 0.807 ± 0.055 | 22.9 ± 3.7 | 46.7 ± 5.6 |
| Jul to Aug | 0.817 ± 0.058 | 23.0 ± 3.7a | 46.3 ± 5.6 |
| Oct to Nov | 0.811 ± 0.040 | 23.8 ± 3.3a | 46.8 ± 5.8 |
| Jan to Feb | 0.807 ± 0.035 | 23.8 ± 3.6 | 46.7 ± 5.4 |
Participants were weighed in their usual clothing without their outer wear, and a correction of 1.0 kg was made to account for the weight of this clothing. a,b,cMeans sharing a common superscript letter are significantly different, P <0.05.
Figure 2Seasonal variation in fasting respiratory quotient values of Japanese, Polish and Thai participants. Broad and narrow bar show mean value and SD, respectively. Closed circle: Japanese; open circle: Polish; triangle: Thai.
Figure 3Seasonal variation in the percent body fat of Japanese, Polish and Thai participants. Broad and narrow bar show mean value and SD, respectively. Closed circle: Japanese; open circle: Polish; triangle: Thai.
Bivariate correlation of respiratory quotient, percent body fat and nutrient intake
| | | | ||
| Energy intake (kcal) | RQ | 0.000 | 0.062 | 0.604 |
| Fat (%) | RQ | 0.000 | 0.036 | 0.763 |
| Carbohydrate (%) | RQ | 0.000 | 0.025 | 0.834 |
| C/F ratio | RQ | 0.005 | 0.058 | 0.625 |
| RQ | %BF | 13.360 | 0.189 | 0.108 |
| Energy intake (kcal) | %BF | −0.001 | −0.119 | 0.314 |
| Fat (%) | %BF | 0.009 | 0.014 | 0.908 |
| Carbohydrate (%) | %BF | −0.048 | −0.076 | 0.522 |
| C/F ratio | %BF | −0.162 | −0.027 | 0.820 |
| | | | ||
| Energy intake (kcal) | RQ | 0.000 | 0.131 | 0.217 |
| Fat (%) | RQ | −0.001 | −0.088 | 0.409 |
| Carbohydrate (%) | RQ | 0.001 | 0.112 | 0.291 |
| C/F ratio | RQ | 0.009 | 0.102 | 0.335 |
| RQ | %BF | 8.349 | 0.192 | 0.068 |
| Energy intake (kcal) | %BF | 0.000 | 0.066 | 0.533 |
| Fat (%) | %BF | 0.063 | 0.188 | 0.075 |
| Carbohydrate (%) | %BF | −0.040 | −0.136 | 0.198 |
| C/F ratio | %BF | −0.697 | −0.179 | 0.090 |
| | | | ||
| RQ | %BF | −4.629 | −0.159 | 0.154 |
C/F ratio: carbohydrate to fat intake ratio; %BF: percent body fat; RQ: respiratory quotient. Correlation between the variables within the subject was analyzed by multiple regression with repeated observations. P <0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.