| Literature DB >> 22738270 |
Yong Huang1, Chunzhi Tang, Shuxia Wang, Yangjia Lu, Wei Shen, Junjun Yang, Junqi Chen, Renyong Lin, Shaoyang Cui, Huiling Xiao, Shanshan Qu, Xinsheng Lai, Baoci Shan.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Acupuncture has been applied to aid in the recovery of post-stroke patients, but its mechanism is unclear. This study aims to analyze the relationship between acupuncture and glucose metabolism in cerebral functional regions in post-stroke patients using (18)FDG PET-CT techniques. Forty-three ischemic stroke patients were randomly divided into 5 groups: the Waiguan (TE5) needling group, the TE5 sham needling group, the sham point needling group, the sham point sham needling group and the non-needling group. Cerebral functional images of all patients were then acquired using PET-CT scans and processed by SPM2 software.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22738270 PMCID: PMC3464148 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2202-13-75
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Neurosci ISSN: 1471-2202 Impact factor: 3.288
Actived/deactivated cerebral areas by needling vs. non-needling
| Needling at TE5 | Left cerebrum, Limbic Lobe, Posterior Cingulate | 30 | activated | −4 | −62 | 12 | 4.09 |
| Sham needle at sham point | Right Cerebrum, Frontal Lobe,Middle Frontal Gyrus | 6 | deactivated | 30 | 10 | 60 | 5.50 |
Figure 1 Cerebral areas activated by needling at TE5 vs. non-needling (red areas).
Figure 2 Cerebral areas activated by sham needling at the sham point vs. non-needling (red areas).
Cerebral areas activated by needling vs. sham needling at TE5
| Right Cerebrum, Occipital Lobe, Middle Temporal Gyrus | 19 | 36 | −58 | 14 | 6.43 |
| Right Cerebrum, Frontal Lobe, Inferior Frontal Gyrus | 47 | 62 | 20 | −4 | 4.88 |
| Right Cerebrum, Frontal Lobe, Inferior Frontal Gyrus | 47 | 58 | 24 | −10 | 4.34 |
| Right Cerebrum, Sub-lobar, Insula | 13 | 30 | −26 | 22 | 4.64 |
| Right Cerebrum, Sub-lobar, Insula | 13 | 34 | −34 | 24 | 4.29 |
Figure 3 Cerebral areas activated by needling vs. sham needling at TE5 (red areas).
The cerebral areas deactivated by needling at TE5 vs. needling at the sham point
| Left Cerebrum, Frontal Lobe, Medial Frontal Gyrus | 9 | −14 | 38 | 28 | 4.65 |
| Right Cerebellum, vermis | 18 | −64 | 55 | 4.42 | |
Figure 4 Cerebral areas deactivated by needling at TE5 vs. at the sham point (red areas).
Summary of the cerebral areas activated/deactivated by needling at TE5
| Frontal Lobe,Inferior Frontal Gyrus | |
| Limbic Lobe,Posterior Cingulate | Occipital Lobe, Middle Temporal Gyrus |
| Sub-lobar,Insula | |
Note: italics = deactivated areas.
Ischemic stroke patient groups (x ± SE)
| Group 1 | |||||
| Needling TE5 | 9 | 55.78 ± 3.90 | 5/4 | 3.45 ± 1.00 | 10.30 ± 3.72 |
| Group 2 | |||||
| Sham needling TE5 | 9 | 56.34 ± 4.18 | 5/4 | 3.12 ± 2.21 | 11.89 ± 3.56 |
| Group 3 | |||||
| Needling sham point | 9 | 56.54 ± 4.15 | 5/4 | 3.32 ± 1.66 | 10.42 ± 2.15 |
| Group 4 | |||||
| Sham needling sham point | 9 | 57.67 ± 4.36 | 6/3 | 2.95 ± 1.13 | 9.50 ± 3.10 |
| Group 5 | |||||
| Non-needling | 9 | 54.17 ± 4.66 | 5/4 | 3.16 ± 1.10 | 11.95 ± 2.33 |
Figure 5 Location of TE5 and the sham point.
Figure 6 The processing course.