Literature DB >> 22738022

Turning off sacral nerve stimulation does not affect gastric and small intestinal motility in patients treated for faecal incontinence.

J Worsøe1, J Fassov, V Schlageter, N J M Rijkhoff, S Laurberg, K Krogh.   

Abstract

AIM: Sacral nerve stimulation (SNS) reduces symptoms in up to 80% of patients with faecal incontinence (FI). Its effects are not limited to the distal colon and the pelvic floor. Accordingly, spinal or supraspinal neuromodulation have been suggested as part of the mode of action. The effect of SNS on gastric and small-intestinal motility was studied.
METHOD: Using the magnet tracking system, MTS-1, a small magnetic pill was tracked twice through the upper gastrointestinal tract of eight patients with FI successfully treated with SNS. Following a randomized double-blind crossover design, the stimulator was either left active or was turned off for 1 week before investigations with MTS-1.
RESULTS: The median (range) frequency of gastric con-tractions was 3.05 (2.83-3.40) per min during SNS and 3.04 (2.79?-3.76) per min without (P=NS). The median (range) frequency of contractions in the small intestine during the first 2h after pyloric passage was 10.005 (9.68-10.70) per min during SNS and 10.09 (9.79-10.29) per min without SNS (P=NS). The median (range) velocity of the magnetic pill during the first 2h in the small intestine was 1.6 (1.2-2.8) cm/min during SNS and 1.7 (0.8-3.7) cm/min without SNS (P=NS). Small-intestinal propagation mainly occurred during very fast movements (>15cm/min), accounting for 51% (42-60%) of the distance 3% (2-4%) of the time during SNS and for 53% (18-73%) of the distance 3% (1-8%) of the time without SNS (P=NS).
CONCLUSION: Turning off SNS for 1week did not affect gastric or small-intestinal motility patterns.
© 2012 The Authors. Colorectal Disease © 2012 The Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22738022     DOI: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2012.03148.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Colorectal Dis        ISSN: 1462-8910            Impact factor:   3.788


  6 in total

1.  Sacral nerve stimulation with appropriate parameters improves constipation in rats by enhancing colon motility mediated via the autonomic-cholinergic mechanisms.

Authors:  Zhihui Huang; Shiying Li; Robert D Foreman; Jieyun Yin; Ning Dai; Jiande D Z Chen
Journal:  Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol       Date:  2019-08-14       Impact factor: 4.052

2.  Tools for fecal incontinence assessment: lessons for inflammatory bowel disease trials based on a systematic review.

Authors:  Ferdinando D'Amico; Steven D Wexner; Carolynne J Vaizey; Célia Gouynou; Silvio Danese; Laurent Peyrin-Biroulet
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2020-07-17       Impact factor: 4.623

3.  Regional Gastrointestinal Transit Times in Patients With Carcinoid Diarrhea: Assessment With the Novel 3D-Transit System.

Authors:  Tine Gregersen; Anne-Mette Haase; Vincent Schlageter; Henning Gronbaek; Klaus Krogh
Journal:  J Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2015-07-30       Impact factor: 4.924

4.  Effects of sEA on Slow Transit Constipation through the Microbiota-Gut-Brain Axis in Rats.

Authors:  Xun Jin; Yanting Guan; Hua Bai; Yan Liu; Xing Lv
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2020-12-14       Impact factor: 2.629

5.  A randomised, controlled study of small intestinal motility in patients treated with sacral nerve stimulation for irritable bowel syndrome.

Authors:  Janne Fassov; Lilli Lundby; Jonas Worsøe; Steen Buntzen; Søren Laurberg; Klaus Krogh
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-06-25       Impact factor: 3.067

Review 6.  Systematic review of the impact of sacral neuromodulation on clinical symptoms and gastrointestinal physiology.

Authors:  Naseem Mirbagheri; Yogeesan Sivakumaran; Natasha Nassar; Marc A Gladman
Journal:  ANZ J Surg       Date:  2015-08-05       Impact factor: 1.872

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.