Literature DB >> 22737629

Immune surveillance of pre-cancerous senescent hepatocytes limits hepatocellular carcinoma development.

Tetyana Yevsa1, Tae-Won Kang, Lars Zender.   

Abstract

Here we discuss a recently published study from our group on how a continuous CD4 T-cell dependent immune clearance of premalignant senescent cells, designated "senescence surveillance," restricts liver cancer development.

Entities:  

Year:  2012        PMID: 22737629      PMCID: PMC3382854          DOI: 10.4161/onci.19128

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncoimmunology        ISSN: 2162-4011            Impact factor:   8.110


Upon the aberrant activation of oncogenes cells can either undergo apoptosis or cellular senescence, a state of stable cell cycle arrest. Like apoptosis, cellular senescence was shown to also represent an important failsafe mechanism against tumor development in vivo (reviewed in ref. 2). While cellular senescence so far has been regarded a solely cell intrinsic mechanism of tumor suppression, i.e., suppressing tumor development through the induction of a stable cell cycle arrest, recent data from our laboratory suggest that the cellular senescence program also plays a crucial role in the induction of immune responses against pre-cancerous cells. To mimic aberrant oncogene activation, which can occur in hepatocytes of chronically damaged human livers, we stably delivered oncogenic Nras into mouse livers in vivo. NrasG12V expression in hepatocytes was accompanied by the induction of a cellular senescence response. Senescent NrasG12V expressing hepatocytes were found to express a myriad of cytokines and chemokines, which led to the attraction of innate as well as adaptive immune cells. These different immune cell populations were found in close proximity to senescent, NrasG12V expressing hepatocytes. In accordance with the hypothesis that attracted immune cells could mediate the clearance of senescent cells, time course analyses revealed a progressive loss of NrasG12V expressing senescent cells within two months after stable intrahepatic delivery of oncogenic Nras. Importantly, all analyses were paralleled using a Nras effector loop mutant (Nras) incapable of signaling to downstream pathways and therefore for senescence induction. Importantly, NrasG12V/D38A expressing hepatocytes could be detected long-term after intrahepatic delivery, thus ruling out immune responses against overexpressed Nras peptide per se. To address the significance of the observed immune cell populations for the clearance of senescent cells, we took a genetic approach: NrasG12V expressing transposable elements were intrahepatically delivered into mice harboring genetically defined immune defects and the number of NrasG12V expressing senescent cells was followed over time. We found that the immune clearance of pre-cancerous NrasG12V expressing hepatocytes was abrogated in severe combined immunodeficient (SCID) mice and also in CD4 knockout mice. Strikingly, the missing immune clearance of NrasG12V expressing pre-cancerous cells in these mice resulted in the development of hepatocellular carcinomas at later time points. Enzyme-linked immunospot (ELISPOT) assays revealed the presence of mutant Nras-specific CD4 T-cells in mice harboring senescent NrasG12V expressing hepatocytes but not in Nras-transduced p19Arf knockout mice, in which induction of the cellular senescence program is genetically disabled. Collectively, our data showed that oncogene induced senescence (OIS) plays an important role in the induction of specific immune responses against antigens expressed in pre-cancerous cells. Further mechanistic studies characterized the observed CD4 T-cell response as a Th1 type response and we found that CD4 T-cells depended on monocytes and freshly replenished macrophages to efficiently kill senescent hepatocytes (Fig. 1). Interestingly, liver resident macrophages (Kupffer cells) were found not to be involved in the killing of NrasG12V expressing senescent hepatocytes.

Figure 1. Clearance of pre-malignant senescent cells through a CD4 T-cell mediated immune response. Upon the aberrant activation of oncogenes cells can either undergo apoptosis or cellular senescence. Pre-malignant senescent hepatocytes are subject to a continuous CD4 T-cell mediated immune clearance which is crucial for liver cancer suppression. CD4 T-cells depend on monocytes/macrophages to execute the killing of pre-malignant senescent hepatocytes.

Figure 1. Clearance of pre-malignant senescent cells through a CD4 T-cell mediated immune response. Upon the aberrant activation of oncogenes cells can either undergo apoptosis or cellular senescence. Pre-malignant senescent hepatocytes are subject to a continuous CD4 T-cell mediated immune clearance which is crucial for liver cancer suppression. CD4 T-cells depend on monocytes/macrophages to execute the killing of pre-malignant senescent hepatocytes. Taken together, our study shows that a continuous, CD4 T-cell mediated immune clearance of pre-malignant senescent cells is crucial to suppress liver cancer development. Conversely, an impaired immune clearance of premalignant senescent hepatocytes was shown to result in the development of liver carcinomas. Our study suggests that a small subfraction of senescent hepatocytes can escape their cell cycle arrest if there is no immune clearance of these cells. However, a direct demonstration of this senescence escape remains subject for future studies. Finally we also addressed whether there is evidence for immune surveillance of senescent hepatocytes in humans. For this purpose, we quantified the numbers of senescent hepatocytes in patients under immunosuppressive therapy (due to organ transplantation) or in patients with HIV infection, both conditions that impact CD4 T-cell function. Increased numbers of senescent hepatocytes were found in both cohorts, thus supporting that immune surveillance of senescent cells also occurs in humans. There has been a long scientific debate regarding the significance of a T-cell dependent immune surveillance mechanism of pre-cancerous cells (reviewed in ref. 4). For example, an elegant recent study showed that spontaneous intrahepatic activation of the Simian virus 40 (SV40) large T antigen did not result in efficient immune responses against these hepatocytes but rather resulted in the growth of liver carcinomas and tumor-specific T cells were found to produce TGFβ rather than IFNγ. Our data may help to resolve some of the controversy, as it suggests that the induction of a specific immune response against pre-cancerous cells is dependent on an intact cellular senescence response. Therefore, immune surveillance against pre-cancerous cells may occur if the senescence program is engaged after the occurrence of an oncogenic event. However, if the induction of the cellular senescence program is affected, e.g., due to impaired p53 function or reduced levels of p14Arf (p19Arf in mice), a specific immune response against such tumor prone cells may not occur. The fact that SV40 is known to disable senescence induction may explain the lack of immune surveillance of SV40 expressing hepatocytes in the study by Blankenstein and colleagues. Future studies are needed to characterize whether immune surveillance of pre-cancerous senescent cells also occurs in other organs. Also, a deeper characterization of the underlying mechanisms of senescence surveillance, especially the individual contribution of involved cyto- and chemokines secreted from senescent cells is needed. Such studies may pave the way to eventually harness this process for cancer prevention and therapy.
  5 in total

Review 1.  Intrinsic tumour suppression.

Authors:  Scott W Lowe; Enrique Cepero; Gerard Evan
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-11-18       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Senescence comes of age.

Authors:  Masashi Narita; Scott W Lowe
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 53.440

3.  Sporadic immunogenic tumours avoid destruction by inducing T-cell tolerance.

Authors:  Gerald Willimsky; Thomas Blankenstein
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-09-01       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Senescence surveillance of pre-malignant hepatocytes limits liver cancer development.

Authors:  Tae-Won Kang; Tetyana Yevsa; Norman Woller; Lisa Hoenicke; Torsten Wuestefeld; Daniel Dauch; Anja Hohmeyer; Marcus Gereke; Ramona Rudalska; Anna Potapova; Marcus Iken; Mihael Vucur; Siegfried Weiss; Mathias Heikenwalder; Sadaf Khan; Jesus Gil; Dunja Bruder; Michael Manns; Peter Schirmacher; Frank Tacke; Michael Ott; Tom Luedde; Thomas Longerich; Stefan Kubicka; Lars Zender
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 5.  Immune surveillance of tumors.

Authors:  Jeremy B Swann; Mark J Smyth
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 14.808

  5 in total
  12 in total

Review 1.  Cellular senescence and the senescent secretory phenotype: therapeutic opportunities.

Authors:  Tamara Tchkonia; Yi Zhu; Jan van Deursen; Judith Campisi; James L Kirkland
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2013-03-01       Impact factor: 14.808

2.  Iscador Qu inhibits doxorubicin-induced senescence of MCF7 cells.

Authors:  Tatjana Srdic-Rajic; Juan F Santibañez; Ksenija Kanjer; Nevena Tisma-Miletic; Milena Cavic; Daniel Galun; Marko Jevric; Nevena Kardum; Aleksandra Konic-Ristic; Tamara Zoranovic
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-06-19       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Isolation of senescent cells by iodixanol (OptiPrep) density gradient-based separation.

Authors:  Kristina Kovacovicova; Manlio Vinciguerra
Journal:  Cell Prolif       Date:  2019-09-13       Impact factor: 6.831

4.  Senescent cells and macrophages: key players for regeneration?

Authors:  Sonia S Elder; Elaine Emmerson
Journal:  Open Biol       Date:  2020-12-23       Impact factor: 6.411

Review 5.  Trial Watch: Toll-like receptor agonists for cancer therapy.

Authors:  Erika Vacchelli; Alexander Eggermont; Catherine Sautès-Fridman; Jérôme Galon; Laurence Zitvogel; Guido Kroemer; Lorenzo Galluzzi
Journal:  Oncoimmunology       Date:  2013-06-10       Impact factor: 8.110

Review 6.  Immunosuppressants in cancer prevention and therapy.

Authors:  Mikhail V Blagosklonny
Journal:  Oncoimmunology       Date:  2013-11-06       Impact factor: 8.110

Review 7.  Cancer vaccines and immunotherapeutic approaches in hepatobiliary and pancreatic cancers.

Authors:  Inga Hochnadel; Uta Kossatz-Boehlert; Nils Jedicke; Henrike Lenzen; Michael P Manns; Tetyana Yevsa
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2017-11-07       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 8.  Cancer Stem Cells-Origins and Biomarkers: Perspectives for Targeted Personalized Therapies.

Authors:  Lia Walcher; Ann-Kathrin Kistenmacher; Huizhen Suo; Reni Kitte; Sarah Dluczek; Alexander Strauß; André-René Blaudszun; Tetyana Yevsa; Stephan Fricke; Uta Kossatz-Boehlert
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2020-08-07       Impact factor: 7.561

9.  Loss of histone macroH2A1 in hepatocellular carcinoma cells promotes paracrine-mediated chemoresistance and CD4+CD25+FoxP3+ regulatory T cells activation.

Authors:  Oriana Lo Re; Tommaso Mazza; Sebastiano Giallongo; Paola Sanna; Francesca Rappa; Tu Vinh Luong; Giovanni Li Volti; Adela Drovakova; Tania Roskams; Matthias Van Haele; Emmanuel Tsochatzis; Manlio Vinciguerra
Journal:  Theranostics       Date:  2020-01-01       Impact factor: 11.556

Review 10.  Cellular senescence in lymphoid organs and immunosenescence.

Authors:  Vivekananda Budamagunta; Thomas C Foster; Daohong Zhou
Journal:  Aging (Albany NY)       Date:  2021-08-12       Impact factor: 5.682

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.