Literature DB >> 22737566

Evaluation of In Vitro Effectiveness of Seven Disinfectants over Controlling Candida on Complete Dentures.

A A Jafari1, A Falah-Tafti, M H Lotfi-Kamran, H Fallahzadeh, F Akaberi.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Keywords:  Candida; Denture; Disinfectant; In vitro

Year:  2012        PMID: 22737566      PMCID: PMC3372041     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Iran Red Crescent Med J        ISSN: 2074-1804            Impact factor:   0.611


× No keyword cloud information.
Dear Editor, Despite major advances in dentistry and dental prostheses, complete removable dentures are still widely used for oral rehabilitation of edentulous people. Denture surfaces prepare a favorable environment for adherence and proliferation of oral endogenous microorganisms, which is a crucial first step in the initiation of biofilm formation, caused denture stomatitis.[1] Candida species are known as the predominant oral etiologic agent of denture stomatitis, a common mucosal inflammation usually seen on the denturebearing mucosa of denture wearers.[2][3] There are several physical and chemical methods for cleaning of denture plaques.[4] Overnight soaking of denture in chemical solutions' including denture cleansers and detergents is an applicable and inexpensive method for improving of denture hygiene.[5] Ideal denture cleansers and disinfectants should be bactericidal, fungicidal, nontoxic and harmless to denture’s structure, effective for removing of organic and inorganic deposits on the denture.[4] To compare the effectiveness of seven commercially available disinfectants for cleaning of complete denture, we performed an experimental study in Yazd Dentistry School. Sixty three complete maxillary dentures, which were used more than one year, were randomly divided to nine groups. Cultures from their internal surface were obtained by vigorous rubbing with a sterile cotton swab onto Sabouraud dextrose agar plates, incubated 48 hours at 30ºC for quantification of isolated Candida colonies. Isolated Candida colonies were also identified using germ tube test. Denture were then immersed for 1 hour in sterile ‘ziplock’ bags filled with 200 ml of sodium hypochlorite (2%, 1% and 0.5%), 0.2% chlorhexidine, 4% benzalconium chloride, 1% deconex and normal saline. Sterile distilled water and 100,000 IU solution of nystatin were also used as negative and positive controls in the current study. After the disinfectant protocol, the dentures were washed with sterile distilled water, re-swabbed and cultured as previously described before the disinfection. All cultures were performed by a single operator using sterile gloves, which were disposed and replaced for each denture. Density of isolated Candida colonies before and after disinfection was compared with Wilcoxon statistical (P<0.05) test using SPSS software. All dentures were positive for Candida species in the initial culture before disinfection protocol (Table 1). Candida albicans was the most common isolated Candida species isolated from 71% of dentures, followed by non-albicans Candida species, isolated from 23% of dentures and 6% had mix species. All immersion solutions were found to reduce the growth of Candida in comparing with the initial culture. Two percent sodium hypochlorite (p=0.008), 1% sodium hypochlorite (p=0.016), 0.2% cholorhexidine (p=0.025) and 1% deconex (p=0.046) were known as the most effective disinfectants shown the maximum reduction in the load of isolated Candida species in current study (Table 2).
Table 1

Positive cultures of Candida on dentures before and after protocol, the numbers indicate the positive growth from total of seven dentures

Disinfectant solutionsBeforeAfter
2% Sodium hypochlorite70
1% Sodium hypochlorite71
0.5% Sodium hypochlorite71
02% Cholorhexidine72
1% Deconex72
4% Benzalconium chloride73
Normal saline74
Nystatine70
Distilled water77
Table 2

Load of Candida colonies (CFU) on the dentures

Disinfectant solutionsInitial culture Mean (SD)After the protocol Mean (SD)P value
2% Sodium hypochlorite202 (45.2)3 (1)0.008
1% Sodium hypochlorite75.3 (34.8)4.1 (2)0.016
0.5% Sodium hypochlorite119 (39.5)6.2 (2.3)0.036
02% Cholorhexidine152 (48.3)5.5 (2)0.025
1% Deconex89.2 (27)11 (3)0.046
4% Benzalconium chloride109.3 (51.2)15 (3.2)0.066
Normal saline121.7 (32.9)29 (5.7)0.083
Nystatine155 (51.2)00.0001
Distilled water68.5 (8)43.2 (18)0.45
The results of the current study showed that all the initial cultures obtained from dentures, which taken directly from the patients’ mouth were positive for Candida species as expected. The objective of denture disinfection by immersing in chemicals is to obtain a clean, decontaminated prosthesis by removing the oral microbial contamination.[5] There are many studies, which showed more efficacy of chemical than physical methods.[6] The 2% and 1% sodium hypochlorite showed the highest cleaning effect followed by 0.2% chlorhexidine in the current study as also reported by Montagner et al.,[7] Furthermore 0.5% sodium hypochlorite, deconex (1%) and 4% benzalconium chloride showed a lower effect in disinfection of denture in the current study. Yilmaz et al. used 5.25% and 2% sodium hypochlorite as well as deconex and salvex and showed the same results;[8] however 5% sodium hypochlorite can damage dentures[9] and was not used in the present study.
  8 in total

1.  An infection control protocol: effectiveness of immersion solutions to reduce the microbial growth on dental prostheses.

Authors:  A C Pavarina; A C Pizzolitto; A L Machado; C E Vergani; E T Giampaolo
Journal:  J Oral Rehabil       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 3.837

Review 2.  Candida-associated denture stomatitis. Aetiology and management: a review. Part 1. Factors influencing distribution of Candida species in the oral cavity.

Authors:  B C Webb; C J Thomas; M D Willcox; D W Harty; K W Knox
Journal:  Aust Dent J       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 2.291

Review 3.  Denture plaque and denture cleansers: review of the literature.

Authors:  D C Abelson
Journal:  Gerodontics       Date:  1985-10

Review 4.  Epidemiology and etiology of denture stomatitis.

Authors:  Linda Gendreau; Zvi G Loewy
Journal:  J Prosthodont       Date:  2011-04-04       Impact factor: 2.752

5.  Effects of disinfectants on resilient denture-lining materials contaminated with Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus sobrinus, and Candida albicans.

Authors:  Handan Yilmaz; Cemal Aydin; Bilge Turhan Bal; Berrin Ozçelik
Journal:  Quintessence Int       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 1.677

6.  Reassessing the presence of Candida albicans in denture-related stomatitis.

Authors:  Jean Barbeau; Jacynthe Séguin; Jean Paul Goulet; Louis de Koninck; Sylvie Louise Avon; Benoit Lalonde; Pierre Rompré; Noëlla Deslauriers
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod       Date:  2003-01

7.  Efficacy of denture disinfection methods in controlling Candida albicans colonization in vitro.

Authors:  Ralf Buergers; Martin Rosentritt; Wulf Schneider-Brachert; Michael Behr; Gerhard Handel; Sebastian Hahnel
Journal:  Acta Odontol Scand       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 2.331

8.  In vitro antifungal action of different substances over microwaved-cured acrylic resins.

Authors:  Henrique Montagner; Francisco Montagner; Katia Olmedo Braun; Paulo Edelvar Correa Peres; Brenda Paula Figueiredo de Almeida Gomes
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2009 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.698

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.