AIM: To assess whether DNA methylation patterns in chronic alcoholics are different from non-alcoholic sibling controls. METHODS: We examined the methylation patterns in DNA samples from 25 chronic alcoholics and 22 matched siblings as controls (one per family). DNA was extracted from peripheral blood and analyzed for differences in the methylation patterns after bisulfite-conversion. We used the Illumina GoldenGate Methylation Cancer Panel I (Illumina, San Diego, CA), which probes the methylation profile at 1505 CpG sites from 807 cancer related genes. We excluded the 84 X-chromosome CpG sites and 134 autosomal CpG sites that failed to show a within sample reliability score of at least 95% for all samples, leaving 1287 autosomal CpG sites (associated with 743 autosomal genes) with reliable signals for all samples. A methylation score was calculated as the average methylation for the 1287 CpG sites examined. Differences were assessed by a two-sample t-test. We also examined the average sib pair differences in methylation scores at each of the 1287 sites. All analyses were performed using SPSS, version 9.0, P < 0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: Methylation levels at the 1287 CpG sites averaged 28.2% for both alcoholics and controls. The mean difference in methylation scores between alcoholic and non-alcoholic sibs by CpG site was < 1% with small inter-individual variances; and only 5 CpG sites had an average sib difference > 5%. Subgroup analysis showed that methylation scores were significantly lower for the alcoholic-dependent subjects who smoked compared to their non-smoking unaffected siblings. Specifically, among smokers who are alcoholic, global methylation indices were significantly lower than in non-alcoholic sib controls, whereas among non-smoking alcoholics, the global indices were significantly higher (P = 0.008). CONCLUSION: Although we observed no effect of alcoholism alone on DNA methylation, there is a decrease in alcoholics who smoke, suggesting a mechanism for alcohol-tobacco synergy for carcinogenesis.
AIM: To assess whether DNA methylation patterns in chronic alcoholics are different from non-alcoholic sibling controls. METHODS: We examined the methylation patterns in DNA samples from 25 chronic alcoholics and 22 matched siblings as controls (one per family). DNA was extracted from peripheral blood and analyzed for differences in the methylation patterns after bisulfite-conversion. We used the Illumina GoldenGate Methylation Cancer Panel I (Illumina, San Diego, CA), which probes the methylation profile at 1505 CpG sites from 807 cancer related genes. We excluded the 84 X-chromosome CpG sites and 134 autosomal CpG sites that failed to show a within sample reliability score of at least 95% for all samples, leaving 1287 autosomal CpG sites (associated with 743 autosomal genes) with reliable signals for all samples. A methylation score was calculated as the average methylation for the 1287 CpG sites examined. Differences were assessed by a two-sample t-test. We also examined the average sib pair differences in methylation scores at each of the 1287 sites. All analyses were performed using SPSS, version 9.0, P < 0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: Methylation levels at the 1287 CpG sites averaged 28.2% for both alcoholics and controls. The mean difference in methylation scores between alcoholic and non-alcoholic sibs by CpG site was < 1% with small inter-individual variances; and only 5 CpG sites had an average sib difference > 5%. Subgroup analysis showed that methylation scores were significantly lower for the alcoholic-dependent subjects who smoked compared to their non-smoking unaffected siblings. Specifically, among smokers who are alcoholic, global methylation indices were significantly lower than in non-alcoholic sib controls, whereas among non-smoking alcoholics, the global indices were significantly higher (P = 0.008). CONCLUSION: Although we observed no effect of alcoholism alone on DNA methylation, there is a decrease in alcoholics who smoke, suggesting a mechanism for alcohol-tobacco synergy for carcinogenesis.
Entities:
Keywords:
Alcohol; Cancer; Carcinogenesis; Cigarettes; DNA methylation; Epigenetics; Smoking; Tobacco
Authors: J B Fan; A Oliphant; R Shen; B G Kermani; F Garcia; K L Gunderson; M Hansen; F Steemers; S L Butler; P Deloukas; L Galver; S Hunt; C McBride; M Bibikova; T Rubano; J Chen; E Wickham; D Doucet; W Chang; D Campbell; B Zhang; S Kruglyak; D Bentley; J Haas; P Rigault; L Zhou; J Stuelpnagel; M S Chee Journal: Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol Date: 2003
Authors: John W M Martens; Inko Nimmrich; Thomas Koenig; Maxime P Look; Nadia Harbeck; Fabian Model; Antje Kluth; Joan Bolt-de Vries; Anieta M Sieuwerts; Henk Portengen; Marion E Meijer-Van Gelder; Christian Piepenbrock; Alexander Olek; Heinz Höfler; Marion Kiechle; Jan G M Klijn; Manfred Schmitt; Sabine Maier; John A Foekens Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2005-05-15 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Martin Widschwendter; Kimberly D Siegmund; Hannes M Müller; Heidi Fiegl; Christian Marth; Elisabeth Müller-Holzner; Peter A Jones; Peter W Laird Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2004-06-01 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Devin C Koestler; Brock Christensen; Margaret R Karagas; Carmen J Marsit; Scott M Langevin; Karl T Kelsey; John K Wiencke; E Andres Houseman Journal: Epigenetics Date: 2013-06-25 Impact factor: 4.528
Authors: Shaunna L Clark; Karolina A Aberg; Srilaxmi Nerella; Gaurav Kumar; Joseph L McClay; Wenan Chen; Linying Y Xie; Aki Harada; Andrey A Shabalin; Guimin Gao; Sarah E Bergen; Christina M Hultman; Patrik K E Magnusson; Patrick F Sullivan; Edwin J C G van den Oord Journal: Alcohol Clin Exp Res Date: 2015-07-04 Impact factor: 3.455
Authors: Matthew N Davies; Lutz Krause; Jordana T Bell; Fei Gao; Kirsten J Ward; Honglong Wu; Hanlin Lu; Yuan Liu; Pei-Chein Tsai; David A Collier; Therese Murphy; Emma Dempster; Jonathan Mill; Alexis Battle; Sara Mostafavi; Xiaowei Zhu; Anjali Henders; Enda Byrne; Naomi R Wray; Nicholas G Martin; Tim D Spector; Jun Wang Journal: Genome Biol Date: 2014-04-02 Impact factor: 13.583