Literature DB >> 22736331

Improving susceptibility mapping using a threshold-based K-space/image domain iterative reconstruction approach.

J Tang1, S Liu, J Neelavalli, Y C N Cheng, S Buch, E M Haacke.   

Abstract

To improve susceptibility quantification, a threshold-based k-space/image domain iterative approach that uses geometric information from the susceptibility map itself as a constraint to overcome the ill-posed nature of the inverse filter is introduced. Simulations were used to study the accuracy of the method and its robustness in the presence of noise. In vivo data were processed and analyzed using this method. Both simulations and in vivo results show that most streaking artifacts inside the susceptibility map caused by the ill-defined inverse filter were suppressed by the iterative approach. In simulated data, the bias toward lower mean susceptibility values inside vessels has been shown to decrease from around 10% to 2% when choosing an appropriate threshold value for the proposed iterative method. Typically, three iterations are sufficient for this approach to converge and this process takes less than 30 s to process a 512×512×256 dataset. This iterative method improves quantification of susceptibility inside vessels and reduces streaking artifacts throughout the brain for data collected from a single-orientation acquisition. This approach has been applied to vessels alone as well as to vessels and other structures with lower susceptibility to generate whole brain susceptibility maps with significantly reduced streaking artifacts.
Copyright © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22736331      PMCID: PMC3482302          DOI: 10.1002/mrm.24384

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Med        ISSN: 0740-3194            Impact factor:   4.668


  30 in total

1.  Susceptibility mapping in the human brain using threshold-based k-space division.

Authors:  Sam Wharton; Andreas Schäfer; Richard Bowtell
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 2.  Imaging iron stores in the brain using magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  E Mark Haacke; Norman Y C Cheng; Michael J House; Qiang Liu; Jaladhar Neelavalli; Robert J Ogg; Asadullah Khan; Muhammad Ayaz; Wolff Kirsch; Andre Obenaus
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 2.546

3.  Measurement of magnetic susceptibility and calculation of shape factor of NMR samples.

Authors:  Roy E Hoffman
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2005-10-25       Impact factor: 2.229

4.  Accounting for signal loss due to dephasing in the correction of distortions in gradient-echo EPI via nonrigid registration.

Authors:  Yong Li; Ning Xu; J Michael Fitzpatrick; Victoria L Morgan; David R Pickens; Benoit M Dawant
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 10.048

5.  High-field MRI of brain cortical substructure based on signal phase.

Authors:  Jeff H Duyn; Peter van Gelderen; Tie-Qiang Li; Jacco A de Zwart; Alan P Koretsky; Masaki Fukunaga
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-06-22       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Quantitative MR susceptibility mapping using piece-wise constant regularized inversion of the magnetic field.

Authors:  Ludovic de Rochefort; Ryan Brown; Martin R Prince; Yi Wang
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 4.668

7.  The sign convention for phase values on different vendor systems: definition and implications for susceptibility-weighted imaging.

Authors:  Gisela E Hagberg; E Brian Welch; Andreas Greiser
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2009-08-21       Impact factor: 2.546

8.  Morphology enabled dipole inversion (MEDI) from a single-angle acquisition: comparison with COSMOS in human brain imaging.

Authors:  Tian Liu; Jing Liu; Ludovic de Rochefort; Pascal Spincemaille; Ildar Khalidov; James Robert Ledoux; Yi Wang
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2011-04-04       Impact factor: 4.668

9.  Differentiation between diamagnetic and paramagnetic cerebral lesions based on magnetic susceptibility mapping.

Authors:  Ferdinand Schweser; Andreas Deistung; Berengar W Lehr; Jürgen R Reichenbach
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 4.071

10.  Limitations of calculating field distributions and magnetic susceptibilities in MRI using a Fourier based method.

Authors:  Yu-Chung N Cheng; Jaladhar Neelavalli; E Mark Haacke
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2009-01-30       Impact factor: 3.609

View more
  46 in total

1.  Streaking artifact reduction for quantitative susceptibility mapping of sources with large dynamic range.

Authors:  Hongjiang Wei; Russell Dibb; Yan Zhou; Yawen Sun; Jianrong Xu; Nian Wang; Chunlei Liu
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2015-08-27       Impact factor: 4.044

Review 2.  Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping: Concepts and Applications.

Authors:  J R Reichenbach; F Schweser; B Serres; A Deistung
Journal:  Clin Neuroradiol       Date:  2015-07-22       Impact factor: 3.649

3.  Quantitative MRI using STrategically Acquired Gradient Echo (STAGE): optimization for 1.5 T scanners and T1 relaxation map validation.

Authors:  Alice Pirastru; Yongsheng Chen; Laura Pelizzari; Francesca Baglio; Mario Clerici; E Mark Haacke; Maria Marcella Laganà
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Susceptibility weighted imaging and quantitative susceptibility mapping of the cerebral vasculature using ferumoxytol.

Authors:  Saifeng Liu; Jean-Christophe Brisset; Jiani Hu; E Mark Haacke; Yulin Ge
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2017-07-21       Impact factor: 4.813

5.  An improved method for susceptibility and radius quantification of cylindrical objects from MRI.

Authors:  Ching-Yi Hsieh; Yu-Chung N Cheng; Jaladhar Neelavalli; E Mark Haacke; R Jason Stafford
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2015-01-26       Impact factor: 2.546

6.  Asymmetrically hypointense veins on T2*w imaging and susceptibility-weighted imaging in ischemic stroke.

Authors:  Ulf Jensen-Kondering; Ruwen Böhm
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2013-04-28

Review 7.  Susceptibility-weighted imaging and quantitative susceptibility mapping in the brain.

Authors:  Chunlei Liu; Wei Li; Karen A Tong; Kristen W Yeom; Samuel Kuzminski
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2014-10-01       Impact factor: 4.813

8.  Quantitative susceptibility mapping in the human fetus to measure blood oxygenation in the superior sagittal sinus.

Authors:  Brijesh Kumar Yadav; Sagar Buch; Uday Krishnamurthy; Pavan Jella; Edgar Hernandez-Andrade; Anabela Trifan; Lami Yeo; Sonia S Hassan; E Mark Haacke; Roberto Romero; Jaladhar Neelavalli
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Susceptibility mapping of the dural sinuses and other superficial veins in the brain.

Authors:  Sagar Buch; Yongsheng Chen; E Mark Haacke
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2018-10-21       Impact factor: 2.546

Review 10.  Susceptibility-weighted imaging: current status and future directions.

Authors:  Saifeng Liu; Sagar Buch; Yongsheng Chen; Hyun-Seok Choi; Yongming Dai; Charbel Habib; Jiani Hu; Joon-Yong Jung; Yu Luo; David Utriainen; Meiyun Wang; Dongmei Wu; Shuang Xia; E Mark Haacke
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2016-05-18       Impact factor: 4.044

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.