Literature DB >> 22735674

Some comments and suggestions concerning population pharmacokinetic modeling, especially of digoxin, and its relation to clinical therapy.

Roger W Jelliffe1.   

Abstract

Population pharmacokinetic and dynamic modeling is often employed to analyze data of steady-state trough serum digoxin concentrations in the course of what is frequently regarded as routine therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM). Such a monitoring protocol is extremely uninformative. It permits only the estimation of a single parameter of a 1-compartment model, such as clearance. The use of D-optimal design strategies permits much more information to be obtained, employing models having a really meaningful structure. Strategies and protocols for routine TDM policies greatly need to be improved, incorporating these principles of optimal design. Software for population pharmacokinetic modeling has been dominated by NONMEM. However, because NONMEM is a parametric method, it must assume a shape for the model parameter distributions. If the assumption is not correct, the model will be in error, and the most likely results given the raw data will not be obtained. In addition, the likelihood as computed by NONMEM is only approximate, not exact. This impairs statistical consistency and reduces statistical efficiency and the resulting precision of model parameter estimates. Other parametric methods are superior, as they provide exact likelihoods. However, they still suffer from the constraints of assuming the shape of the model parameter distributions. Nonparametric methods are more flexible. One need not make any assumptions about the shape of the parameter distributions. Nonparametric methods also provide exact likelihoods and are statistically consistent, efficient, and precise. They also permit maximally precise dosage regimens to be developed for patients using multiple model dosage design, something parametric modeling methods cannot do. Laboratory assay errors are better described by the reciprocal of the assay variance of each measurement rather than by coefficient of variation. This is easy to do and permits more precise models to be made. This also permits estimation of assay error separately from the other sources of uncertainty in the clinical environment. This is most useful scientifically. Digoxin has at least 2-compartment behavior. Its pharmacologic and clinical effects correlate not with serum digoxin concentrations but with those in the peripheral nonserum compartment. Some illustrative clinical examples are discussed. It seems that digitalis therapy, guided by TDM and our 2 compartment models based on that of Reuning et al, can convert at least some patients with atrial fibrillation and flutter to regular sinus rhythm. Investigators have often used steady-state trough concentrations only to make a 1-compartment model and have sought only to predict future steady-state trough concentrations. Much more than this can be done, and clinical care can be much improved. Further work along these lines is greatly to be desired.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22735674      PMCID: PMC3837704          DOI: 10.1097/FTD.0b013e31825c88bb

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ther Drug Monit        ISSN: 0163-4356            Impact factor:   3.681


  22 in total

1.  Inefficacy of "therapeutic" serum levels of digoxin in controlling the ventricular rate in atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  S Goldman; P Probst; A Selzer; K Cohn
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1975-05       Impact factor: 2.778

2.  Distribution and elimination of digoxin in infants.

Authors:  G Wettrell
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1977       Impact factor: 2.953

3.  Pharmacokinetics of digoxin: comparison of a two- and a three-compartment model in man.

Authors:  W G Kramer; R P Lewis; T C Cobb; W F Forester; J A Visconti; L A Wanke; H G Boxenbaum; R H Reuning
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Biopharm       Date:  1974-08

4.  Optimal sampling times for pharmacokinetic experiments.

Authors:  D Z D'Argenio
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Biopharm       Date:  1981-12

5.  Conversion of atrial fibrillation to sinus rhythm and rate control by digoxin in comparison to placebo.

Authors:  L Jordaens; J Trouerbach; P Calle; R Tavernier; E Derycke; P Vertongen; B Bergez; Y Vandekerckhove
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 29.983

6.  Intravenous digoxin in acute atrial fibrillation. Results of a randomized, placebo-controlled multicentre trial in 239 patients. The Digitalis in Acute Atrial Fibrillation (DAAF) Trial Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 29.983

Review 7.  Clinical pharmacokinetics of digoxin.

Authors:  E Iisalo
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1977 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 6.447

8.  Clinical course of acute atrial fibrillation treated with rapid digitalization.

Authors:  P Weiner; M M Bassan; J Jarchovsky; S Iusim; L Plavnick
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  1983-02       Impact factor: 4.749

9.  Digoxin for converting recent-onset atrial fibrillation to sinus rhythm. A randomized, double-blinded trial.

Authors:  R H Falk; A A Knowlton; S A Bernard; N E Gotlieb; N J Battinelli
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 10.  Individualizing drug dosage regimens: roles of population pharmacokinetic and dynamic models, Bayesian fitting, and adaptive control.

Authors:  R W Jelliffe; A Schumitzky; M Van Guilder; M Liu; L Hu; P Maire; P Gomis; X Barbaut; B Tahani
Journal:  Ther Drug Monit       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 3.681

View more
  12 in total

1.  [Digitalis and theophylline: old and superfluous?].

Authors:  M Gosch; P Dovjak
Journal:  Z Gerontol Geriatr       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 1.281

Review 2.  Fundamentals of Population Pharmacokinetic Modelling : Modelling and Software.

Authors:  Tony K L Kiang; Catherine M T Sherwin; Michael G Spigarelli; Mary H H Ensom
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 3.  Benchmarking therapeutic drug monitoring software: a review of available computer tools.

Authors:  Aline Fuchs; Chantal Csajka; Yann Thoma; Thierry Buclin; Nicolas Widmer
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 6.447

4.  Ethionamide Population Pharmacokinetic Model and Target Attainment in Multidrug-Resistant Tuberculosis.

Authors:  Mohammad H Al-Shaer; Anne-Grete Märtson; Wael A Alghamdi; Abdullah Alsultan; Guohua An; Shahriar Ahmed; Yosra Alkabab; Sayera Banu; Eric R Houpt; David Ashkin; David E Griffith; J Peter Cegielski; Scott K Heysell; Charles A Peloquin
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2020-08-20       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  The role of digitalis pharmacokinetics in converting atrial fibrillation and flutter to regular sinus rhythm.

Authors:  Roger W Jelliffe
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 6.447

6.  Cefepime Precision Dosing Tool: from Standard to Precise Dose Using Nonparametric Population Pharmacokinetics.

Authors:  Mohammad H Alshaer; Sylvain Goutelle; Barbara A Santevecchi; Bethany R Shoulders; Veena Venugopalan; Kartikeya Cherabuddi; Jiajun Liu; Patrick J Kiel; Jason A Roberts; Fekade Bruck Sime; Marc H Scheetz; Michael N Neely; Charles A Peloquin
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2021-12-13       Impact factor: 5.938

7.  Applying Cefepime Population Pharmacokinetics to Critically Ill Patients Receiving Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy.

Authors:  Mohammad H Al-Shaer; Kelly Maguigan; Jennifer Ashton; Veena Venugopalan; Molly E Droege; Carolyn D Philpott; Christopher A Droege; Daniel P Healy; Eric W Mueller; Charles A Peloquin
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2021-10-18       Impact factor: 5.938

8.  A two-compartment population pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model of digoxin in adults, with implications for dosage.

Authors:  Roger W Jelliffe; Mark Milman; Alan Schumitzky; David Bayard; Michael Van Guilder
Journal:  Ther Drug Monit       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 3.681

9.  Optimal design of perturbations for individual two-compartment pharmacokinetic analysis.

Authors:  Matthew S Shotwell; Minchun Zhou; William H Fissell
Journal:  J Biopharm Stat       Date:  2015-08-06       Impact factor: 1.051

Review 10.  Management of atrial fibrillation in critically ill patients.

Authors:  Mattia Arrigo; Dominique Bettex; Alain Rudiger
Journal:  Crit Care Res Pract       Date:  2014-01-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.