Literature DB >> 22735369

Risk assessment of endocrine active chemicals: identifying chemicals of regulatory concern.

Remi Bars1, Ivana Fegert, Melanie Gross, Dick Lewis, Lennart Weltje, Arnd Weyers, James R Wheeler, Malyka Galay-Burgos.   

Abstract

The European regulation on plant protection products (1107/2009) (EC, 2009a), the revisions to the biocides Directive (COM[2009]267) (EC, 2009b), and the regulation concerning chemicals (Regulation (EC) No. 1907/2006 'REACH') (EC.2006) only support the marketing and use of chemical products on the basis that they do not induce endocrine disruption in humans or wildlife species. In the absence of agreed guidance on how to identify and evaluate endocrine activity and disruption within these pieces of legislation a European Centre for Ecotoxicology and Toxicology of Chemicals (ECETOC) task force was formed to provide scientific criteria that may be used within the context of these three legislative documents. The resulting ECETOC technical report (ECETOC, 2009a) and the associated workshop (ECETOC, 2009b) presented a science-based concept on how to identify endocrine activity and disrupting properties of chemicals for both human health and the environment. The synthesis of the technical report and the workshop report was published by the ECETOC task force (Bars et al., 2011a,b). Specific scientific criteria for the determination of endocrine activity and disrupting properties that integrate information from both regulatory (eco)toxicity studies and mechanistic/screening studies were proposed. These criteria combined the nature of the adverse effects detected in studies which give concern for endocrine toxicity with an understanding of the mode of action of toxicity so that adverse effects can be explained scientifically. A key element in the data evaluation is the consideration of all available information in a weight-of-evidence approach. However, to be able to discriminate chemicals with endocrine properties of low concern from those of higher concern (for regulatory purposes), the task force recognised that the concept needed further refinement. Following a discussion of the key factors at a second workshop of invited regulatory, academic and industry scientists (ECETOC, 2011), the task force developed further guidance, which is presented in this paper. For human health assessments these factors include the relevance to humans of the endocrine mechanism of toxicity, the specificity of the endocrine effects with respect to other potential toxic effects, the potency of the chemical to induce endocrine toxicity and consideration of exposure levels. For ecotoxicological assessments the key considerations include specificity and potency, but also extend to the consideration of population relevance and negligible exposure. It is intended that these complement and reinforce the approach originally described and previously published in this journal (Bars et al., 2011a,b).
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22735369     DOI: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2012.06.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol        ISSN: 0273-2300            Impact factor:   3.271


  4 in total

Review 1.  Regulatory decisions on endocrine disrupting chemicals should be based on the principles of endocrinology.

Authors:  Laura N Vandenberg; Theo Colborn; Tyrone B Hayes; Jerrold J Heindel; David R Jacobs; Duk-Hee Lee; John Peterson Myers; Toshi Shioda; Ana M Soto; Frederick S vom Saal; Wade V Welshons; R Thomas Zoeller
Journal:  Reprod Toxicol       Date:  2013-02-11       Impact factor: 3.143

2.  Ecotoxicological study of six drugs in Aliivibrio fischeri, Daphnia magna and Raphidocelis subcapitata.

Authors:  Laura Lomba; David Lapeña; Natalia Ros; Elena Aso; Mariachiara Cannavò; Diego Errazquin; Beatriz Giner
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2020-01-11       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  A computational approach to evaluate the androgenic affinity of iprodione, procymidone, vinclozolin and their metabolites.

Authors:  Corrado Lodovico Galli; Cristina Sensi; Amos Fumagalli; Chiara Parravicini; Marina Marinovich; Ivano Eberini
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-08-11       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 4.  Food safety in the 21st century.

Authors:  Fred Fung; Huei-Shyong Wang; Suresh Menon
Journal:  Biomed J       Date:  2018-05-21       Impact factor: 4.910

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.