Literature DB >> 22735163

Short- and long-term effects of continuous versus intermittent restrictive diet approaches on body composition and the metabolic profile in overweight and obese postmenopausal women: a pilot study.

Hélène Arguin1, Isabelle J Dionne, Martin Sénéchal, Danielle R Bouchard, André C Carpentier, Jean-Luc Ardilouze, Angelo Tremblay, Claude Leblanc, Martin Brochu.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to compare changes in body composition and the metabolic profile between women taking an intermittent diet (ID) and women taking a continuous diet (CD).
METHODS: Twenty-five obese postmenopausal women were randomized to an ID (n = 13) or a CD (n = 12). In the ID, 5-week energy restriction periods were followed by 5-week weight stabilization periods. In the CD, 15 weeks of energy restriction was followed by 5 weeks of weight stabilization. Outcome measures before, during, and after weight loss, as well as after a 1-year follow-up, were body weight and composition, waist circumference, resting metabolic rate, and fasting lipid and glucose levels.
RESULTS: Body weight, waist circumference, percentage fat mass, and fat mass decreased significantly and similarly in both groups (P < 0.0001). Both groups showed similar overall decreases in plasma total cholesterol and triglycerides (all P < 0.05). Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol improved significantly in the CD group only, whereas fasting glucose decreased significantly in the ID group only. High-density lipoprotein cholesterol and resting metabolic rate remained stable in both groups. Fasting plasma triglyceride and glucose levels were the only metabolic variables to further improve after the fifth week of the protocol. At the 1-year follow-up, both interventions were associated with successful and similar weight loss maintenance and improvements in fasting plasma glucose levels.
CONCLUSIONS: The ID resulted in similar short- and long-term changes in body composition and metabolic profile compared with a CD. Most improvements occurred during the first 5 weeks of treatment in both interventions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22735163     DOI: 10.1097/gme.0b013e318250a287

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Menopause        ISSN: 1072-3714            Impact factor:   2.953


  18 in total

Review 1.  Effectiveness of an intermittent fasting diet versus continuous energy restriction on anthropometric measurements, body composition and lipid profile in overweight and obese adults: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Andrea Enríquez Guerrero; Ismael San Mauro Martín; Elena Garicano Vilar; María Alicia Camina Martín
Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr       Date:  2020-12-09       Impact factor: 4.016

2.  Acute and short-term effects of caloric restriction on metabolic profile and brain activation in obese, postmenopausal women.

Authors:  S Jakobsdottir; I C van Nieuwpoort; C C van Bunderen; M B de Ruiter; J W R Twisk; J B Deijen; D J Veltman; M L Drent
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2016-05-24       Impact factor: 5.095

3.  Caloric Restriction to Moderate Senescence: Mechanisms and Clinical Utility.

Authors:  Stephen D Anton; Christy Karabetian; Kacey Heekin; Christiaan Leeuwenburgh
Journal:  Curr Transl Geriatr Exp Gerontol Rep       Date:  2013-12-13

Review 4.  Intermittent energy restriction and weight loss: a systematic review.

Authors:  C S Davis; R E Clarke; S N Coulter; K N Rounsefell; R E Walker; C E Rauch; C E Huggins; L Ryan
Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr       Date:  2015-11-25       Impact factor: 4.016

5.  Fasting or caloric restriction for healthy aging.

Authors:  Stephen Anton; Christiaan Leeuwenburgh
Journal:  Exp Gerontol       Date:  2013-04-29       Impact factor: 4.032

6.  Intermittent fasting for the prevention of cardiovascular disease.

Authors:  Mohammed Allaf; Hussein Elghazaly; Omer G Mohamed; Mohamed Firas Khan Fareen; Sadia Zaman; Abdul-Majeed Salmasi; Kostas Tsilidis; Abbas Dehghan
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-01-29

Review 7.  Nutrigenomics of body weight regulation: a rationale for careful dissection of individual contributors.

Authors:  Jaap Keijer; Femke P M Hoevenaars; Arie Nieuwenhuizen; Evert M van Schothorst
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2014-10-21       Impact factor: 5.717

8.  Intermittent Moderate Energy Restriction Improves Weight Loss Efficiency in Diet-Induced Obese Mice.

Authors:  Radhika V Seimon; Yan-Chuan Shi; Katy Slack; Kailun Lee; Hamish A Fernando; Amy D Nguyen; Lei Zhang; Shu Lin; Ronaldo F Enriquez; Jackie Lau; Herbert Herzog; Amanda Sainsbury
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-01-19       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Caloric restriction favorably impacts metabolic and immune/inflammatory profiles in obese mice but curcumin/piperine consumption adds no further benefit.

Authors:  Junpeng Wang; Sally M Vanegas; Xiaogang Du; Timothy Noble; Jean-Marc A Zingg; Mohsen Meydani; Simin Nikbin Meydani; Dayong Wu
Journal:  Nutr Metab (Lond)       Date:  2013-03-27       Impact factor: 4.169

Review 10.  Weight-Loss Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Intermittent Energy Restriction Trials Lasting a Minimum of 6 Months.

Authors:  Michelle Headland; Peter M Clifton; Sharayah Carter; Jennifer B Keogh
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2016-06-08       Impact factor: 5.717

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.