Literature DB >> 22735156

Basic linguistic composition recruits the left anterior temporal lobe and left angular gyrus during both listening and reading.

D K Bemis1, L Pylkkänen.   

Abstract

Language is experienced primarily through one of two mediums--spoken words and written text. Although substantially different in form, these two linguistic vehicles possess similar powers of expression. Consequently, one goal for the cognitive neuroscience of language is to determine where, if anywhere, along the neural path from sensory stimulation to ultimate comprehension these two processing streams converge. In the present study, we investigate the relationship between basic combinatorial operations in both reading and listening. Using magnetoencephalography, we measured neural activity elicited by the comprehension of simple adjective-noun phrases (red boat) using the same linguistic materials and tasks in both modalities. The present paradigm deviates from previous cross-modality studies by investigating only basic combinatorial mechanisms--specifically, those evoked by the construction of simple adjective-noun phrases. Our results indicate that both modalities rely upon shared neural mechanisms localized to the left anterior temporal lobe (lATL) and left angular gyrus (lAG) during such processing. Furthermore, we found that combinatorial mechanisms subserved by these regions are deployed in the same temporal order within each modality, with lATL activity preceding lAG activity. Modality-specific combinatorial effects were identified during initial perceptual processing, suggesting top-down modulation of low-level mechanisms even during basic composition.

Keywords:  auditory/visual; basic combinatorics; language; magnetoencephalography; minimal phrases

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22735156     DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhs170

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cereb Cortex        ISSN: 1047-3211            Impact factor:   5.357


  57 in total

1.  Flexible conceptual combination: Electrophysiological correlates and consequences for associative memory.

Authors:  Heather D Lucas; Ryan J Hubbard; Kara D Federmeier
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2017-02-13       Impact factor: 4.016

Review 2.  The neuroanatomic and neurophysiological infrastructure for speech and language.

Authors:  David Poeppel
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2014-07-26       Impact factor: 6.627

Review 3.  Empirical approaches to the study of language evolution.

Authors:  W Tecumseh Fitch
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-02

4.  The temporal dynamics of structure and content in sentence comprehension: Evidence from fMRI-constrained MEG.

Authors:  William Matchin; Christian Brodbeck; Christopher Hammerly; Ellen Lau
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2018-09-26       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  The priming of basic combinatory responses in MEG.

Authors:  Esti Blanco-Elorrieta; Victor S Ferreira; Paul Del Prato; Liina Pylkkänen
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2017-09-22

Review 6.  Towards a new neurobiology of language.

Authors:  David Poeppel; Karen Emmorey; Gregory Hickok; Liina Pylkkänen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-10-10       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  An Attempt to Conceptually Replicate the Dissociation between Syntax and Semantics during Sentence Comprehension.

Authors:  Matthew Siegelman; Idan A Blank; Zachary Mineroff; Evelina Fedorenko
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2019-06-11       Impact factor: 3.590

8.  Composing lexical versus functional adjectives: Evidence for uniformity in the left temporal lobe.

Authors:  Linmin Zhang; Liina Pylkkänen
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-12

9.  Neural correlates of three cognitive processes involved in theory of mind and discourse comprehension.

Authors:  Nan Lin; Xiaohong Yang; Jing Li; Shaonan Wang; Huimin Hua; Yujun Ma; Xingshan Li
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 3.282

10.  Abstract linguistic structure correlates with temporal activity during naturalistic comprehension.

Authors:  Jonathan R Brennan; Edward P Stabler; Sarah E Van Wagenen; Wen-Ming Luh; John T Hale
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2016-05-19       Impact factor: 2.381

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.