Literature DB >> 22734051

Evolution of the Australian lungfish (Neoceratodus forsteri) genome: a major role for CR1 and L2 LINE elements.

Cushla J Metcalfe1, Jonathan Filée, Isabelle Germon, Jean Joss, Didier Casane.   

Abstract

Haploid genomes greater than 25,000 Mb are rare, within the animals only the lungfish and some of the salamanders and crustaceans are known to have genomes this large. There is very little data on the structure of genomes this size. It is known, however, that for animal genomes up to 3,000 Mb, there is in general a good correlation between genome size and the percent of the genome composed of repetitive sequence and that this repetitive component is highly dynamic. In this study, we sampled the Australian lungfish genome using three mini-genomic libraries and found that with very little sequence, the results converged on an estimate of 40% of the genome being composed of recognizable transposable elements (TEs), chiefly from the CR1 and L2 long interspersed nuclear element clades. We further characterized the CR1 and L2 elements in the lungfish genome and show that although most CR1 elements probably represent recent amplifications, the L2 elements are more diverse and are more likely the result of a series of amplifications. We suggest that our sampling method has probably underestimated the recognizable TE content. However, on the basis of the most likely sources of error, we suggest that this very large genome is not largely composed of recently amplified, undetected TEs but may instead include a large component of older degenerate TEs. Based on these estimates, and on Thomson's (Thomson K. 1972. An attempt to reconstruct evolutionary changes in the cellular DNA content of lungfish. J Exp Zool. 180:363-372) inference that in the lineage leading to the extant Australian lungfish, there was massive increase in genome size between 350 and 200 mya, after which the size of the genome changed little, we speculate that the very large Australian lungfish genome may be the result of a massive amplification of TEs followed by a long period with a very low rate of sequence removal and some ongoing TE activity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22734051     DOI: 10.1093/molbev/mss159

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Biol Evol        ISSN: 0737-4038            Impact factor:   16.240


  19 in total

Review 1.  Evolutionary impact of transposable elements on genomic diversity and lineage-specific innovation in vertebrates.

Authors:  Ian A Warren; Magali Naville; Domitille Chalopin; Perrine Levin; Chloé Suzanne Berger; Delphine Galiana; Jean-Nicolas Volff
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 5.239

2.  What's in a genome? The C-value enigma and the evolution of eukaryotic genome content.

Authors:  Tyler A Elliott; T Ryan Gregory
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2015-09-26       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 3.  Genome Biology and the Evolution of Cell-Size Diversity.

Authors:  Rachel Lockridge Mueller
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2015-08-07       Impact factor: 10.005

4.  Is junk DNA bunk? A critique of ENCODE.

Authors:  W Ford Doolittle
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-03-11       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  A new model army: Emerging fish models to study the genomics of vertebrate Evo-Devo.

Authors:  Ingo Braasch; Samuel M Peterson; Thomas Desvignes; Braedan M McCluskey; Peter Batzel; John H Postlethwait
Journal:  J Exp Zool B Mol Dev Evol       Date:  2014-08-11       Impact factor: 2.656

6.  Accommodating the load: The transposable element content of very large genomes.

Authors:  Cushla J Metcalfe; Didier Casane
Journal:  Mob Genet Elements       Date:  2013-03-01

7.  Hellbender genome sequences shed light on genomic expansion at the base of crown salamanders.

Authors:  Cheng Sun; Rachel Lockridge Mueller
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 3.416

8.  Investigation of the activity of transposable elements and genes involved in their silencing in the newt Cynops orientalis, a species with a giant genome.

Authors:  Federica Carducci; Elisa Carotti; Marco Gerdol; Samuele Greco; Adriana Canapa; Marco Barucca; Maria Assunta Biscotti
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-07-20       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  The case for junk DNA.

Authors:  Alexander F Palazzo; T Ryan Gregory
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2014-05-08       Impact factor: 5.917

10.  Modular organization and reticulate evolution of the ORF1 of Jockey superfamily transposable elements.

Authors:  Cushla J Metcalfe; Didier Casane
Journal:  Mob DNA       Date:  2014-07-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.